| Stem cell patents on a knife edge | |
Abstract/OtherAbstract
:
|
<sec><st>Legal context</st> Hundreds of millions of dollars are poured into human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research worldwide making stem-cell technology heavily reliant on patent protection. This article examines challenges posed by the (non)existence of ‘morality’ or <it>ordre public</it> clauses to patenting of human embryonic stem cells in Australia, the European Union, and the United States. </sec> <sec><st>Key points</st> HESC patents are easily granted in the United States and to an extent in Australia, while, on the other hand, there is a temporary halt on issuing any hESC patents at the European Patent Office (EPO). The paper considers the interpretations of section 18(2) of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) in two key decisions by the Deputy Commissioner of Patents in Australia and the strong patent protection granted to the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) stem-cell patents, including the challenge posed to the validity of those patents in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). In contrast, the paper also highlights previous decisions and current non-decisiveness of the EPO on this issue. </sec> <sec><st>Practical significance</st> What role could and/or should ethics play in the patent system? The paper draws on the ethical conflicts depicted earlier in the text and discusses whether the patent system is and/or should be an appropriate authority to handle ethical issues in relation to stem-cell inventions. </sec> |
Authors
:
|
Agovic, Amina |
Contributors
:
|
- |
Publication Detail
:
|
Publisher : Oxford University Press Type : TEXT Format : text/html |
Date Detail
:
|
2008-11-01 00:00:00.0 |
Subject
:
|
Articles |
Coverage
:
|
- |
Relation
:
|
- |
Source
:
|
- |
Copyright Information
:
|
Copyright (C) 2008, Oxford University Press |
Other Details
:
|
Languages : en |
Export Citation
:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
Previous Document: First successful legal challenge to NICE guidance
Next Document: Do we face a third revolution in human history? If so, how will public health respond?