| Palm tree justice in the Bertoua court of appeal : the witchcraft cases | |
Abstract/OtherAbstract
:
|
This paper examines thirty witchcraft cases reviewed by the Court of Appeal of Bertoua (East Province, Cameroon) during the period 1981-1984. The basic aim is to highlight the nature and sources of witchcraft accusations, the process of securing a conviction (i.e. proof), and finally, the magnitude of punishment meted out on sentencing. These issues are crystallized by a number of questions: Who initiates a witchcraft accusation and under what circumstances is such an accusation initiated? How do the modern courts establish proof in witchcraft accusations? What role does a witch doctor/diviner play in witchcraft proceedings? Are the modern State courts well suited to judge issues whose manifestations are strictly outside the limits of observable phenomena? A close review of the thirty cases shows that witchcraft accusations can be loosely classified into five main groups, according to their sources: village unrest and menace to State institutions; jealousy and hatred; quest for power; mystical cannibalism and irresistible impulses; and malpractices by witch doctors. The review is preceded by a brief survey of the colonial legacy on witchcraft and allied phenomena. |
Authors
:
|
Fisiy, C.F. |
Related Documents
:
|
7636714 - Reconstruction from irregular samples with improved locality 4573304 - Report for the period 1968-1970. |
Contributors
:
|
- |
Publication Detail
:
|
Publisher : African Studies Centre, Leiden Type : Research paper Format : application/pdf |
Date Detail
:
|
1990 |
Subject
:
|
cm |
Coverage
:
|
cm |
Relation
:
|
- |
Source
:
|
- |
Copyright Information
:
|
Fisiy, C.F. |
Other Details
:
|
Languages : en, en_US |
Export Citation
:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
Previous Document: Risk factors of thrombosis in cancer: the role of microparticles
Next Document: The serological gastric biopsy in primary care : studies on atrophic gastritis