Document Detail


vigiGrade: a tool to identify well-documented individual case reports and highlight systematic data quality issues.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  24343765     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Individual case safety reports of suspected harm from medicines are fundamental to post-marketing surveillance. Their value is directly proportional to the amount of clinically relevant information they include. To improve the quality of the data, communication between stakeholders is essential and can be facilitated by a simple score and visualisation of the results.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to propose a measure of completeness and identify predictors of well-documented reports, globally.
METHODS: The Uppsala Monitoring Centre has developed the vigiGrade completeness score to measure the amount of clinically relevant information in structured format, without reflecting whether the information establishes causality between the drug and adverse event. The vigiGrade completeness score (C) starts at 1 for reports with information on time-to-onset, age, sex, indication, outcome, report type, dose, country, primary reporter and comments. For each missing dimension, a penalty is detracted which varies with clinical relevance. We classified reports with C > 0.8 as well-documented and identified all such reports in the WHO global individual case safety report database, VigiBase, from 2007 to January 2012. We utilised odds ratios with statistical shrinkage to identify subgroups with unexpectedly high proportions of well-documented reports.
RESULTS: Altogether, 430,000 (13 %) of the studied reports achieved C > 0.8 in VigiBase. For VigiBase as a whole, the median completeness was 0.41 with an interquartile range of 0.26-0.63. Two out of three well-documented reports come from Europe, and two out of three from physicians. Among the countries with more than 1,000 reports in total, the highest rate of well-documented reports is 65 % in Italy. Tunisia, Spain, Portugal, Croatia and Denmark each have rates above 50 %, and another 20 countries have rates above 30 %. On the whole, 24 % of the reports from physicians are well-documented compared with only 4 % for consumers/non-health professionals. Notably, Denmark and Norway have more than 50 % well-documented reports from consumers/non-health professionals and higher rates than for physicians. The rate of well-documented reports for the E2B format is 11 % compared with 22 % for the older INTDIS (International Drug Information System) format. However, for E2B reports entered via the WHO programme's e-reporting system VigiFlow, the rate is 29 %.
CONCLUSION: Overall, only one report in eight provides the desired level of information, but much higher proportions are observed for individual countries. Physicians and e-reporting tools also generate greater proportions of well-documented reports overall. Reports from consumers/non-health professionals in specific regions have excellent quality, which illustrates their potential for the future. vigiGrade has already provided valuable information by highlighting data quality issues both in Italy and the USA.
Authors:
Tomas Bergvall; G Niklas Norén; Marie Lindquist
Related Documents :
1936775 - Agenesis of the right lobe of the liver: case report.
16927635 - Atypical manifestations of acute retrocecal appendicitis in a child.
15757065 - Gallbladder volvulus: report of two original cases and review of the literature.
2313505 - Ectopia of the vas deferens.
12452905 - Guide to the radiology report.
10844755 - Intraventricular neurocytoma: a clinicopathological study of 20 cases with review of th...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Drug safety     Volume:  37     ISSN:  0114-5916     ISO Abbreviation:  Drug Saf     Publication Date:  2014 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2014-01-10     Completed Date:  2014-08-29     Revised Date:  2014-11-17    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9002928     Medline TA:  Drug Saf     Country:  New Zealand    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  65-77     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems / standards,  statistics & numerical data*
Communication
Databases, Factual / standards,  statistics & numerical data*
Humans
International Cooperation
Pharmacovigilance
Product Surveillance, Postmarketing / methods*,  standards
Quality Assurance, Health Care
Research Design
Sweden
World Health Organization

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Identification and profiling of novel and conserved microRNAs during the flower opening process in P...
Next Document:  Lipid and fatty acid metabolism in Ralstonia eutropha: relevance for the biotechnological production...