Document Detail


Is vaginal birth after cesarean less expensive than repeat cesarean delivery?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  10739514     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare total medical costs of trial of labor after cesarean with those of elective repeat cesarean without labor, with both short- and long-term neonatal costs associated with such procedures taken into account. STUDY DESIGN: Costs associated with All Patient Refined diagnosis-related groups and Current Procedural Terminology for a large not-for-profit health care system were applied to an algorithm describing maternal and neonatal outcomes of trial of labor. Perinatal morbidity rates and cost estimates for long-term neurologic damage associated with uterine rupture were derived from published literature. RESULTS: If a 70% vaginal birth rate for women undergoing a trial of labor and delivery in a tertiary center with a mean uterine rupture to delivery time of 13 minutes is assumed, the net cost differential ranged from a saving of $149 to a loss of $217, depending on morbidity assumptions. For vaginal birth after cesarean success rates <70%, trial of labor in the presence of two previous scars, and institutional factors increasing the perinatal morbidity rate by just 4% with respect to that seen in tertiary centers, trial of labor resulted in a net financial loss to the health care system regardless of all other assumptions made. CONCLUSIONS: When costs as opposed to charges are considered and the cost of long-term care for neurologically injured infants is taken into account, trial of labor after previous cesarean is unlikely to be associated with a significant cost saving for the health care system. Recent government-mandated length-of-stay requirements are likely to make the economic benefit of vaginal birth after cesarean even less favorable. Factors other than cost must govern decisions regarding trial of labor or repeat cesarean.
Authors:
S L Clark; J R Scott; T F Porter; D A Schlappy; V McClellan; D A Burton
Related Documents :
7832674 - Trial of vaginal birth following cesarean section for arrest disorders of labor: analys...
20646704 - Impact of also training on the management of prolonged labor and neonatal care at kager...
15346814 - Waterbirths compared with landbirths: an observational study of nine years.
21203574 - A large cross-sectional community-based study of newborn care practices in southern tan...
17681904 - Object loss, renewed mourning, and psychic change in jane austen's persuasion.
9357944 - Apoptosis in the brains of infants suffering intrauterine cerebral injury.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  American journal of obstetrics and gynecology     Volume:  182     ISSN:  0002-9378     ISO Abbreviation:  Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.     Publication Date:  2000 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2000-05-02     Completed Date:  2000-05-02     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0370476     Medline TA:  Am J Obstet Gynecol     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  599-602     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Intermountain Health Care, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Algorithms
Birth Injuries / economics
Cesarean Section / economics*
Female
Health Care Costs
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Pregnancy
Risk Assessment
Time Factors
Trial of Labor
Vaginal Birth after Cesarean / economics*
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jan;184(2):250-1   [PMID:  11174527 ]
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Mar;184(4):780   [PMID:  11262495 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Failure of serum beta2-microglobulin levels as an early marker of preeclampsia.
Next Document:  The fetal electrocardiogram: relationship with acidemia at delivery.