Document Detail

The v(2) transition ratio a new electrocardiographic criterion for distinguishing left from right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia origin.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21616286     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
OBJECTIVES: We sought to develop electrocardiography (ECG) criteria for distinguishing left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) from right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) origin in patients with idiopathic outflow tract ventricular tachycardia (OTVT) and lead V(3) R/S transition.
BACKGROUND: Several ECG criteria have been proposed for differentiating left from right OTVT origin; ventricular tachycardias (VTs) with left bundle branch block and V(3) transition remain a challenge.
METHODS: We analyzed the surface ECG pattern of patients with OTVT with a precordial transition in lead V(3) who underwent successful catheter ablation. Sinus and VT QRS morphologies were measured in limb and precordial leads with electronic calipers. The V(2) and V(3) transition ratios were calculated by computing the percentage R-wave during VT (R/R+S)(VT) divided by the percentage R-wave in sinus rhythm (R/R+S)(SR).
RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed ECGs from 40 patients (mean age 44 ± 14 years, 21 female) with outflow tract premature ventricular contractions (PVCs)/VT. Patients with structural heart disease, paced rhythms, and bundle branch block during sinus rhythm were excluded. The V(2) transition ratio was significantly greater for LVOT PVCs compared with RVOT PVCs (1.27 ± 0.60 vs. 0.23 ± 0.16; p < 0.001) and was the only independent predictor of LVOT origin. In 21 prospective cases, a V(2) transition ratio ≥0.60 predicted an LVOT origin with 91% accuracy. A PVC precordial transition occurring later than the sinus rhythm transition excluded an LVOT origin with 100% accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: The V(2) transition ratio is a novel electrocardiographic measure that reliably distinguishes LVOT from RVOT origin in patients with lead V(3) precordial transition. This measure might be useful for counseling patients and planning an ablation strategy.
Brian P Betensky; Robert E Park; Francis E Marchlinski; Matthew D Hutchinson; Fermin C Garcia; Sanjay Dixit; David J Callans; Joshua M Cooper; Rupa Bala; David Lin; Michael P Riley; Edward P Gerstenfeld
Related Documents :
2570426 - The beta-receptor, atheroma and cardiovascular damage.
10423106 - Summary of randomized trials of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.
10809026 - Beta-blockers: the new standard of therapy for mild heart failure.
22231716 - Cardiogenic shock in acs. part 2: role of mechanical circulatory support.
11103026 - 8 french transradial coronary interventions: clinical outcome and late effects on the r...
3603596 - Angiography of nonhemorrhagic cerebral infarction in young adults.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of the American College of Cardiology     Volume:  57     ISSN:  1558-3597     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.     Publication Date:  2011 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-05-27     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8301365     Medline TA:  J Am Coll Cardiol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  2255-62     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Flecainide therapy reduces exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias in patients with catecholaminerg...
Next Document:  The utility of cardiac biomarkers, tissue velocity and strain imaging, and cardiac magnetic resonanc...