Document Detail

The use of reflective and reasoned portfolios by doctors.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20666885     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Rationale  Reflective portfolios have been widely trailed in vocational programmes for health sciences education. While not raised explicitly yet, there is recognition that an essential part of a portfolio may still be missing - that is the experience of theoretical and analytic questioning that should occur after reflection. Aims and objectives  In this paper, we argue that portfolios require both reflective and reasoned components to provide a more complete range of educational experiences for postgraduate doctors in the pursuit of higher qualifications. Methods  We describe the differentiating features between the two components and conclude with some suggestions on how both reflective and reasoned components of portfolios may work synergistically through a series of case studies. Results  The reflective style of portfolio, which is in current use, has been widely accepted as a major advance in postgraduate medical education at all levels. It provides an effective vehicle for encouraging self-consideration and generalizability. It is an important adjunct where it functions as a personal development tool as well as a sophisticated log book. A reasoned or pedagogic element encourages more analytic activities: adding an additional component that can ground the portfolio in theory or research. The portfolio is then able to function in a range of academic spheres and provide a theoretical platform for the wide range of non-clinical empirical work undertaken in clinical settings. The addition of a reasoned component also increases the emphasis on the introduction of new concepts outside the sphere of the learner's experience. Conclusions  A portfolio containing both reflective and reasoned components is then able to function in a range of academic spheres and provide a theoretical platform for the wide range of non-clinical empirical work undertaken in clinical settings. In an iterative mode, such a portfolio element can support a forum for questioning established concepts within a pedagogical environment - the essence of evidence-based practice.
Deborah C Saltman; Abdollah Tavabie; Michael R Kidd
Related Documents :
14974505 - Three-dimensional geometrical models of the inguinal region. towards a new stereology.
19474715 - Advancing from immunonutrition to a pharmaconutrition: a gigantic challenge.
21335315 - A new adaptive structural signature for symbol recognition by using a galois lattice as...
21156385 - Directed differential connectivity graph of interictal epileptiform discharges.
2197105 - Animal models for the study of maturity-onset and hereditary cataract.
20729995 - A note on bounds for vc dimensions.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2010-07-27
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of evaluation in clinical practice     Volume:  18     ISSN:  1365-2753     ISO Abbreviation:  J Eval Clin Pract     Publication Date:  2012 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-01-06     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9609066     Medline TA:  J Eval Clin Pract     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  182-5     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Professor, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK Professor, GP Dean, Kent, Surrey and Sussex Deanery, London, UK Professor, Executive Dean, Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Towards quality Pacific services: the development of a service self-evaluation tool for Pacific addi...
Next Document:  The role of oncologists in multidisciplinary cancer teams in the UK: an untapped resource for team l...