Document Detail


The use of qualitative methods in developing the descriptive systems of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life for use in economic evaluation.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23244799     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: To describe how qualitative methods can be used in the development of descriptive systems of preference-based measures (PBMs) of health-related quality of life.
METHODS: The requirements of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and other agencies together with the increasing use of patient-reported outcome measures has led to an increase in the demand for PBMs. Recently, interest has grown in developing new PBMs and while previous research on PBMs has mainly focused on the methods of valuation, research into the methods of developing descriptive systems is an emerging field.
RESULTS: Traditionally, descriptive systems of PBMs were developed by using top-down methods, where content was derived from existing measures, the literature, or health surveys. A contrasting approach is a bottom-up methodology, which takes the views of patients or laypeople on how their life is affected by their health. This approach generally requires the use of qualitative methods. Qualitative methods lend themselves well to the development of PBMs. They also ensure that the measure has appropriate language, content validity, and responsiveness to change. While the use of qualitative methods in the development of non-PBMs is fairly standard, their use in developing PBMs was until recently nonexistent.
CONCLUSIONS: In this article, we illustrate the use of qualitative methods by presenting two case studies of recently developed PBMs, one generic and one condition specific. We outline the stages involved, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the approach, and compare with the top-down approach used in the majority of PBMs to date.
Authors:
Katherine Stevens; Simon Palfreyman
Related Documents :
11847139 - Influence of health promotion bureaucracy on community participation: a canadian case s...
24709299 - Measuring youth health engagement: development of the youth engagement with health serv...
11912859 - Lessons learned. what these seven studies teach us.
24421979 - Mouthwash use in general population: results from adult dental health survey in grampia...
23596769 - How mobile technology can improve healthcare.
24293029 - Quality of life of leprosy sequelae patients living in a former leprosarium under home ...
2082419 - The relationship between chewing sticks (miswak) and periodontal health. 2. relationshi...
22112699 - An equity-effectiveness framework linking health programs and healthy life expectancy.
21443779 - Interprofessional simulated learning: short-term associations between simulation and in...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2012-10-25
Journal Detail:
Title:  Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research     Volume:  15     ISSN:  1524-4733     ISO Abbreviation:  Value Health     Publication Date:  2012 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-12-18     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100883818     Medline TA:  Value Health     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  991-8     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2012 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. Electronic address: K.Stevens@Sheffield.ac.uk.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Fluorescent proteins as visible in vivo sensors.
Next Document:  Patient-level hospital costs and length of stay after conventional versus minimally invasive total h...