Document Detail

A systematic review of interventions to enhance the healing of chronic ulcers of the foot in diabetes.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22271737     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
The outcome of management of diabetic foot ulcers is poor, and there is continuing uncertainty concerning optimal approaches to management. It was for these reasons that in 2006 the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) working group on wound healing undertook a systematic review of the evidence to inform protocols for routine care and to highlight areas which should be considered for further study. The same working group has now updated this review by considering papers on the interventions to improve the healing of chronic ulcers published between December 2006 and June 2010. Methodological quality of selected studies was independently assessed by two reviewers using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. Selected studies fell into the following ten categories: sharp debridement and wound bed preparation with larvae and hydrotherapy; wound bed preparation using antiseptics, applications and dressing products; resection of the chronic wound; hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT); compression or negative pressure therapy; products designed to correct aspects of wound biochemistry and cell biology associated with impaired wound healing; application of cells, including platelets and stem cells; bioengineered skin and skin grafts; electrical, electromagnetic, lasers, shockwaves and ultrasound; other systemic therapies which did not fit in the above categories. Heterogeneity of studies prevented pooled analysis of results. Of the 1322 papers identified, 43 were selected for grading following full text review. The present report is an update of the earlier IWGDF systematic review, but the conclusion is similar: that with the exception of HBOT and, possibly, negative pressure wound therapy, there is little published evidence to justify the use of newer therapies. This echoes the conclusion of a recent Cochrane review and the systematic review undertaken by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Guidelines Committee in the UK. Analysis of evidence presents considerable difficulties in this field particularly as controlled studies are few and the majority are of poor methodological quality. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
F L Game; R J Hinchliffe; J Apelqvist; D G Armstrong; K Bakker; A Hartemann; M Löndahl; P E Price; W J Jeffcoate
Related Documents :
24878397 - Extravasation of contrast media at the puncture site: strategies for managment.
23044577 - In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy in a typical case of melasma.
25261957 - Rater methodology for stroboscopy: a systematic review.
24048727 - Chromoblastomycosis as an endemic disease in temperate europe: first confirmed case and...
24662557 - Central diabetes insipidus as the presenting symptom of granulomatosis with polyangiitis.
20815807 - Ganglioglioma in the nasal cavity: a case report.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews     Volume:  28 Suppl 1     ISSN:  1520-7560     ISO Abbreviation:  Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev.     Publication Date:  2012 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-01-24     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100883450     Medline TA:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  119-41     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Foot Ulcer Trials Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals Trust, Nottingham, UK; Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Derby Hospitals NHS Trust, Uttoxeter Road, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  The development of global consensus guidelines on the management and prevention of the diabetic foot...
Next Document:  A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions in the management of infection in the diab...