Document Detail


The susceptibility of IMRT dose distributions to intrafraction organ motion: an investigation into smoothing filters derived from four dimensional computed tomography data.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16964857     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
This study investigated the sensitivity of static planning of intensity-modulated beams (IMBs) to intrafraction deformable organ motion and assessed whether smoothing of the IMBs at the treatment-planning stage can reduce this sensitivity. The study was performed with a 4D computed tomography (CT) data set for an IMRT treatment of a patient with liver cancer. Fluence profiles obtained from inverse-planning calculations on a standard reference CT scan were redelivered on a CT scan from the 4D data set at a different part of the breathing cycle. The use of a nonrigid registration model on the 4D data set additionally enabled detailed analysis of the overall intrafraction motion effects on the IMRT delivery during free breathing. Smoothing filters were then applied to the beam profiles within the optimization process to investigate whether this could reduce the sensitivity of IMBs to intrafraction organ motion. In addition, optimal fluence profiles from calculations on each individual phase of the breathing cycle were averaged to mimic the convolution of a static dose distribution with a motion probability kernel and assess its usefulness. Results from nonrigid registrations of the CT scan data showed a maximum liver motion of 7 mm in superior-inferior direction for this patient. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) comparison indicated a systematic shift when planning treatment on a motion-frozen, standard CT scan but delivering over a full breathing cycle. The ratio of the dose to 50% of the normal liver to 50% of the planning target volume (PTV) changed up to 28% between different phases. Smoothing beam profiles with a median-window filter did not overcome the substantial shift in dose due to a difference in breathing phase between planning and delivery of treatment. Averaging of optimal beam profiles at different phases of the breathing cycle mainly resulted in an increase in dose to the organs at risk (OAR) and did not seem beneficial to compensate for organ motion compared with using a large margin. Additionally, the results emphasized the need for 4D CT scans when aiming to reduce the internal margin (IM). Using only a single planning scan introduces a systematic shift in the dose distribution during delivery. Smoothing beam profiles either based on a single scan or over the different breathing phases was not beneficial for reducing this shift.
Authors:
Catherine Coolens; Phil M Evans; Joao Seco; Steve Webb; Jane M Blackall; Eike Rietzel; George T Y Chen
Related Documents :
12042947 - Patient acceptance for ct colonography: what is the real issue?
17514187 - The speed of onset of action of alprazolam-xr compared to alprazolam-ct in panic disorder.
22111067 - Stem cell dynamics in an experimental model of stroke.
21907517 - Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver: diffusion-weighted imagi...
2202007 - Imaging of the knee.
22403117 - Quality initiatives: guidelines for use of medical imaging during pregnancy and lactation.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Medical physics     Volume:  33     ISSN:  0094-2405     ISO Abbreviation:  Med Phys     Publication Date:  2006 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2006-09-12     Completed Date:  2006-10-05     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0425746     Medline TA:  Med Phys     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  2809-18     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom. catherine.coolens@icr.ac.uk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Body Burden
Imaging, Three-Dimensional / methods*
Liver Neoplasms / radiography*,  radiotherapy*
Movement*
Radiometry / methods*
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / methods*
Radiotherapy, Conformal / methods*
Relative Biological Effectiveness
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*
Viscera / physiopathology*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Automatic estimation of detector radial position for contoured SPECT acquisition using CT images on ...
Next Document:  Octree indexing of DICOM images for voxel number reduction and improvement of Monte Carlo simulation...