| A survey of the use of grading scales for contact lens complications in optometric practice. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 21175821 Owner: NLM Status: Publisher |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the extent and pattern of use of grading scales for contact lens complications ('grading scales') in optometric practice. Methods: An anonymous postal survey was sent to all 756 members of the Queensland Division of Optometrists Association Australia. Information was elicited relating to level of experience, practice type and location, and mode of usage of grading scales. Results: Survey forms were returned by 237 optometrists, representing a 31 per cent response rate. The majority of respondents (61 per cent) reported using grading scales frequently in practice, while 65 per cent of these preferred to use the Efron Grading Scales for Contact Lens Complications. Seventy-six per cent of optometrists use a method of incremental grading rather than simply grading with whole numbers. Grading scales are more likely to be used by optometrists who have recently graduated (p < 0.001), have a postgraduate certificate in ocular therapeutics (p = 0.018), see more contact lens patients (p = 0.027) and use other forms of grading scales (p < 0.001). The most frequently graded ocular conditions were corneal staining, papillary conjunctivitis and conjunctival redness. The main reasons for not using grading scales included a preference for sketches, photographs or descriptions (87 per cent) and unavailability of scales (29 per cent). Conclusion: Grading scales for contact lens complications are used extensively in optometric practice for a variety of purposes. This tool can now be considered as an expected norm in contact lens practice. We advocate the incorporation of such grading scales into professional guidelines and standards for good optometric clinical practice. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Nathan Efron; Nicola Pritchard; Kady Brandon; Joanne Copeland; Roslyn Godfrey; Benjamin Hamlyn; Vanessa Vrbancic |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: JOURNAL ARTICLE Date: 2010-12-22 |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Clinical & experimental optometry : journal of the Australian Optometrical Association Volume: - ISSN: 1444-0938 ISO Abbreviation: - Publication Date: 2010 Dec |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2010-12-23 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 8703442 Medline TA: Clin Exp Optom Country: - |
Other Details:
|
Languages: ENG Pagination: - Citation Subset: - |
Copyright Information:
|
© 2010 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Optometry © 2010 Optometrists Association Australia. |
Affiliation:
|
Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia E-mail: n.efron@qut.edu.au. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Epimorphin protects hepatocytes from oxidative stress by inhibiting mitochondrial injury.
Next Document: Drug delivery to the posterior segment of the eye through hydrogel contact lenses.