| The silent expert. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 16844805 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
Following a telephonic deposition, the author discovered that a psychiatrist expert witness for the other side had electronically eavesdropped on the entire six-hour proceedings. Under cross-examination the expert admitted eavesdropping on instruction of state's attorneys, and directing their deposition of the author, but denied wrongdoing. The ethical implications of such deceptive behavior and its rationalization are discussed. |
| | |
Authors:
|
David B Menkes |
Related Documents
:
|
15546985 - Partitions with difference conditions and alder's conjecture. 16423735 - Christian bioethics and the church's political worship. 20813465 - Acr appropriateness criteria® on induction and adjuvant therapy for stage n2 non-small... 10459335 - The janes surgical society. 22009445 - Collaborative learning and technology skills development: evaluation of an online annua... |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Volume: 34 ISSN: 1093-6793 ISO Abbreviation: J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law Publication Date: 2006 |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2006-07-17 Completed Date: 2006-12-13 Revised Date: 2007-03-19 |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 9708963 Medline TA: J Am Acad Psychiatry Law Country: United States |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 240-1 Citation Subset: IM |
Affiliation:
|
Wales College of Medicine, Technology Park, Wrexham LL13 7YP, UK. menkes@doctors.org.uk |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Expert Testimony
/
ethics* Forensic Psychiatry* Humans |
| Comments/Corrections | |
Comment In:
|
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2006;34(4):569; author reply 569-70
[PMID:
17185488
]
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Aggression toward forensic evaluators: a statewide survey.
Next Document: Commentary: the higher standards of aspirational ethics.