Document Detail


A sensitivity analysis of secular trends in risk factors and mortality based on cohort studies.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  10069255     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Because of a "healthy responder effect," secular trends in mortality based on cohort studies may be biased if based on responders only. Because responders are selected on the basis of their health at study entry, subjects just entering a study are not comparable with subjects who have been in the study for several years. The result may be an artificial increase in mortality, which impedes analyzing the effect of secular trends in risk factors on mortality. The objective of this paper is to suggest a solution by using data on nonresponders and applying a sensitivity analysis. We illustrate this solution with data on trends in smoking prevalence and all-cause mortality based on a large Danish cohort study with 19 years of complete follow-up on responders and nonresponders. Secular trends in mortality based on the whole sample vs responders only illustrated that results based on responders were biased. In a sensitivity analysis, the observed person-years of nonresponders were distributed among six categories of persons with respect to smoking behavior (never-smokers; ex-smokers; noninhaling current smokers; and current smokers of 1-14, 15-24, and > or =25 gm tobacco per day) according to preset assumptions regarding smoking habits. The observed deaths among nonresponders were then distributed on the six smoking categories according to relative risks derived from a Poisson regression analysis among responders. This procedure allowed us to study the effect of adjustment for smoking on the unbiased secular trend in mortality. By applying different assumptions regarding smoking habits among nonresponders, we explored the effect of the assumptions on the adjusted secular trend in mortality. We conclude that secular trends in mortality based on responders in a cohort study are likely to be biased. If complete follow-up on nonresponders is available, this method could prove useful in other cohort studies.
Authors:
E Prescott; P K Andersen; M Osler; P Lange; J Vestbo
Related Documents :
1787605 - Surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the high-risk patient.
20581155 - Plasma b-type natriuretic peptide as a predictor of mortality in community-dwelling old...
16051615 - Commentary: economic growth is the basis of mortality rate decline in the 20th century-...
18510595 - Golf: a game of life and death--reduced mortality in swedish golf players.
17371185 - Breast self-examination: self-reported frequency, quality, and associated outcomes.
20367275 - Evaluation of a new estradiol oral contraceptive: estradiol valerate and dienogest.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)     Volume:  10     ISSN:  1044-3983     ISO Abbreviation:  Epidemiology     Publication Date:  1999 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1999-04-22     Completed Date:  1999-04-22     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9009644     Medline TA:  Epidemiology     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  176-80     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Center for Prospective Population Studies at the Institute of Preventive Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Aged
Cohort Studies*
Denmark / epidemiology
Epidemiologic Methods*
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Mortality*
Selection Bias*
Sensitivity and Specificity
Smoking / epidemiology*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Harvesting-resistant estimates of air pollution effects on mortality.
Next Document:  Control response proportions in population-based case-control studies in Germany.