Document Detail

The scientific community's response to evidence of fraudulent publication. The Robert Slutsky case.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  8015137     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether scientists can detect fraudulent results in published research articles and to identify corrective measures that are most effective in purging fraudulent results from the literature.
DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study comparing articles by an author known to have published fraudulent articles, Robert A. Slutsky, MD, to a set of control articles. The number of non-self-citations received by each article during each calendar year (1979 through 1990) was counted. The citation numbers were transformed into scores. Each Slutsky article was assigned a score between 1 and 3 based on the number of citations received by the Slutsky article and each of its assigned control articles. Average citation numbers and scores were tracked for each year during the 11-year study period.
RESULTS: Before Slutsky's work was publicly questioned (1975 to 1985), scientists cited his articles as frequently as they cited control articles. After Slutsky's work was questioned and reports were published in the news media (1985), scientists cited his article less frequently than they cited control articles. Citations decreased further after the University of California-San Diego published a review of the validity of Slutsky's work in 1987. Citations did not decrease after the appearance of retractions in print or in MEDLINE.
CONCLUSION: Scientists do not, and probably cannot, identify published articles that are fraudulent. However, when alerted to the presence of fraudulent results in the literature, the scientific community responds by reducing the number of citations of the tainted articles. In the Slutsky case, general news articles and the three reviews published by the University of California-San Diego were most effective and retractions were least effective in purging fraudulent results from the literature.
W P Whitely; D Rennie; A W Hafner
Related Documents :
8811207 - Scleroderma and silicone gel breast prostheses--the sydney study revisited.
23121117 - Review article: herbal and dietary supplement hepatotoxicity.
24156177 - Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis associated with dermatomyositis: a case report.
17330387 - A multi-jurisdiction outbreak of salmonella typhimurium phage type 135 associated with ...
24833147 - Primary papillary hyperplasia of the gallbladder mimicking gallbladder cancer.
18393147 - A critical review on the use of recombinant factor viia in life-threatening obstetric p...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  JAMA     Volume:  272     ISSN:  0098-7484     ISO Abbreviation:  JAMA     Publication Date:  1994 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1994-07-28     Completed Date:  1994-07-28     Revised Date:  2014-09-17    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7501160     Medline TA:  JAMA     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  170-3     Citation Subset:  AIM; E; IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Biomedical Research*
Case-Control Studies
Information Dissemination*
Retrospective Studies
Scientific Misconduct*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Scientific misconduct in environmental science and toxicology.
Next Document:  Evaluating peer reviews. Pilot testing of a grading instrument.