Document Detail

The routine utilization of procedural pain management for pediatric lumbar punctures: are we there yet?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22121399     Owner:  NLM     Status:  PubMed-not-MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the utilization of local anesthetics by emergency physicians (EP) and pediatric physicians (PP) who performed a lumbar puncture (LP) in pediatric patients from birth to 24 months of age.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of children that received an LP at a university tertiary referring hospital. A convenience sample included children from birth to 24 months that received an LP for suspected meningitis in the ED or pediatric units during a one-year period. Physicians performing the LP were blinded to the objectives of the study. Data was collected using a standardized procedure form developed for this study.
RESULTS: Three hundred nine LPs were performed during the study period. Excluded patients consisted of 29 subjects who underwent moderate procedural sedation and 57 subjects that had incomplete procedural data forms. From our sample population of 223 subjects, 146 subjects received a local anesthetic prior to the LP. One hundred twenty six subjects received 1% lidocaine, 20 subjects received EMLA cream (with one subject that received both 1% lidocaine and EMLA), while 77 received no pre-procedural local anesthetic. The use of local anesthetics differed greatly with the age of the patient. Pre-procedural local anesthetics were administered in 65 of 120 subjects less than 12 months of age and in 81 of 82 patients 12 to 24 months of age. Interestingly, the neonatal subject population did not receive any procedural anesthetic by EP or PP. PP and EP differed in the type of local anesthetic utilized prior to performing a LP. EP exclusively used 1% lidocaine while PP preferentially administered EMLA. A subset analysis demonstrated that only PP utilized moderate sedation (Midazolam and Fentanyl) in 41/309 (13%) of the study population.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate that EPs and PPs differ in their preference in the use of local anesthetics prior to LP and that procedural anesthetic is not universal within this pediatric age group and that utilization of a local anesthetic varies by patient age, with younger children less likely to receive a local anesthetic.
KEYWORDS: Local anesthetic; Lumbar puncture; Emergency physician; Pediatric physician.
Julie Gorchynski; Thomas McLaughlin
Related Documents :
23932079 - Occurrence of scalp-fast oscillations among patients with different spiking rate and th...
12822169 - Large left atrial thrombus formation despite warfarin therapy after device closure of a...
639199 - Anticoagulant therapy and central nervous system complications in patients with prosthe...
20590799 - Meeting the unmet needs in anticoagulant therapy.
24340229 - Long-term therapeutic effects of corticoamygdalohippocampectomy for bilateral mesial te...
1479389 - Anticoagulant treatment as a risk factor for primary intracerebral haemorrhage.
21043059 - Changing pattern of organ donation at a single center: are potential brain dead donors ...
3513329 - Effectiveness of foaming antacid in relieving induced heartburn.
11742159 - Effective use of argon plasma coagulation in the treatment of severe radiation proctitis.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of clinical medicine research     Volume:  3     ISSN:  1918-3011     ISO Abbreviation:  J Clin Med Res     Publication Date:  2011 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-11-28     Completed Date:  2012-08-23     Revised Date:  2012-09-10    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101538301     Medline TA:  J Clin Med Res     Country:  Canada    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  164-7     Citation Subset:  -    
Department of Emergency Medicine, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Validity of Amino Terminal pro-Brain Natiuretic Peptide in a Medically Complex Elderly Population.
Next Document:  Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and musculoskeletal status: a comparative cross-sectional stu...