Document Detail


The roles and functions of safety professionals in Taiwan: Comparing the perceptions of safety professionals and safety educators.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22093575     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
INTRODUCTION: The perspectives of both internal and external members have to be considered when developing safety curricula. This study discusses perceptional differences between safety educators (SEs) and safety professionals (SPs) regarding the function of SPs. The findings will serve as a reference framework for the establishment of core safety competencies and the development of safety curricula for SPs.
METHOD: 248 respondents, including both SEs and SPs, completed self-administered questionnaires, which included the 45-item safety function scale (SFS). Nine factors were extracted from the scale using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), namely inspection and research, regulatory tasks, emergency procedures and settlement of damage, management and financial affairs, culture change, problem identification and analysis, developing and implementing solutions, knowledge management, and training and communications.
RESULTS: Descriptive statistical results indicated that SPs and SEs hold differing views on the rank of the frequency of safety functions. MANOVA results indicated that SPs' perceptions of developing and implementing solutions, training and communications, inspection and research, and management and financial affairs were significantly higher than that of SEs. On the other hand, SE's perceptions regarding participation in regulatory tasks were significantly higher than those of SPs. Based on these results, the author suggests that a clear communication channel should be established between universities and industry to reduce the gap between the perceptions of SEs and SPs.
IMPACT ON INDUSTRY: The results of the study are statistically and practically significant. In addition to serving as a reference for the development of safety curricula, the results are also conducive to the establishment of SP roles and functions. Ultimately the development of more suitable safety curricula would open up employment competition for students who graduate from safety-related programs. SPs, on the other hand, can correctly recognize their roles and functions so as to realize the safety expectations invested in them by organizations.
Authors:
Tsung-Chih Wu
Related Documents :
2329045 - Rabies prevention in hawaii.
7500225 - Beyond the schools: strategies for implementing successful drug prevention programs in ...
3633365 - A process evaluation study of peer leaders in health education.
2648305 - Prevention of child maltreatment: what is known.
15689615 - Dental school vacant budgeted faculty positions: academic year 2003-04.
12011505 - Comparing holistic and analytic scoring for performance assessment with many-facet rasc...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2011-10-06
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of safety research     Volume:  42     ISSN:  1879-1247     ISO Abbreviation:  J Safety Res     Publication Date:  2011 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-11-18     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  1264241     Medline TA:  J Safety Res     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  399-407     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Occupational accidents with ladders in Spain: Risk factors.
Next Document:  Disparities in the prevalence of smoke alarms in U.S. households: Conclusions drawn from published c...