|The role of salt abuse on risk for hypercalciuria.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 21211048 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|BACKGROUND: Elevated sodium excretion in urine resulting from excessive sodium intake can lead to hypercalciuria and contribute to the formation of urinary stones. The aim of this study was to evaluate salt intake in patients with urinary lithiasis and idiopathic hypercalciuria (IH).
METHODS: Between August 2007 and June 2008, 105 lithiasic patients were distributed into 2 groups: Group 1 (n = 55): patients with IH (urinary calcium excretion > 250 mg in women and 300 mg in men with normal serum calcium); Group 2 (n = 50): normocalciuric patients (NC). Inclusion criteria were: age over 18 years, normal renal function (creatinine clearance ≥ 60 ml/min), absent proteinuria and negative urinary culture. Pregnant women, patients with intestinal pathologies, chronic diarrhea or using corticoids were excluded. The protocol of metabolic investigation was based on non-consecutive collection of two 24-hour samples for dosages of: calcium, sodium, uric acid, citrate, oxalate, magnesium and urinary volume. Food intake was evaluated by the three-day dietary record quantitative method, and the Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated and classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Sodium intake was evaluated based on 24-hour urinary sodium excretion.
RESULTS: The distribution in both groups as regards mean age (42.11 ± 10.61 vs. 46.14 ± 11.52), weight (77.14 ± 16.03 vs. 75.99 ± 15.80), height (1.64 ± 0.10 vs. 1.64 ± plusorminus 0.08) and BMI (28.78 ± 5.81 vs. 28.07 ± 5.27) was homogeneous. Urinary excretion of calcium (433.33 ± 141.92 vs. 188.93 ± 53.09), sodium (280.08 ± 100.94 vs. 200.44.93 ± 65.81), uric acid (880.63 ± 281.50 vs. 646.74 ± 182.76) and magnesium (88.78 ± 37.53 vs. 64.34 ± 31.84) was significantly higher in the IH group (p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in calcium intake between the groups, and there was significantly higher salt intake in patients with IH than in NC.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that salt intake was higher in patients with IH as compared to NC.
|Patrícia C G Damasio; Carmen R P R Amaro; Natália B Cunha; Ana C Pichutte; José Goldberg; Carlos R Padovani; João L Amaro|
Related Documents :
|10809418 - Body composition in hemodialysis patients--is it different from that of normal subjects?
3372048 - Comparison between three mathematical models of kt/v.
7985668 - The association of intradialytic parenteral nutrition administration with survival in h...
7230618 - Sexual dysfunction in the male patient with uremia: a reappraisal.
879878 - Calcium microemboli and microfilters in valve operations.
12692768 - Threats to "informed" advance directives for the severely physically challenged?
|Type: Journal Article Date: 2011-01-06|
|Title: Nutrition journal Volume: 10 ISSN: 1475-2891 ISO Abbreviation: Nutr J Publication Date: 2011|
|Created Date: 2011-05-24 Completed Date: 2011-09-15 Revised Date: 2013-07-03|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 101152213 Medline TA: Nutr J Country: England|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 3 Citation Subset: IM|
|Graduate Student, Lithotripsy Service, Botucatu School of Medicine, UNESP, Botucatu, Brazil. email@example.com|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Calcium / urine
Creatinine / urine
Hypercalciuria / urine*
Magnesium / urine
Oxalates / urine
Sodium / urine
Sodium Chloride, Dietary / administration & dosage*, adverse effects*
Uric Acid / urine
Urinary Calculi / physiopathology, urine
|0/Oxalates; 0/Sodium Chloride, Dietary; 60-27-5/Creatinine; 69-93-2/Uric Acid; 7439-95-4/Magnesium; 7440-23-5/Sodium; 7440-70-2/Calcium|
|Nutr J. 2011;10:63
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Nutr J
Publisher: BioMed Central
Copyright ©2011 Damasio et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Received Day: 9 Month: 6 Year: 2010
Accepted Day: 6 Month: 1 Year: 2011
collection publication date: Year: 2011
Electronic publication date: Day: 6 Month: 1 Year: 2011
Volume: 10First Page: 3 Last Page: 3
Publisher Id: 1475-2891-10-3
PubMed Id: 21211048
|The role of salt abuse on risk for hypercalciuria|
|Patrícia CG Damasio1||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Carmen RPR Amaro2||Email: email@example.com|
|Natália B Cunha3||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Ana C Pichutte3||Email: email@example.com|
|José Goldberg4||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Carlos R Padovani5||Email: email@example.com|
|João L Amaro4||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
1Graduate Student, Lithotripsy Service, Botucatu School of Medicine, UNESP, Botucatu, Brazil
2PhD, Faculty at the Botucatu School of Medicine, UNESP, Lithotripsy Service, Botucatu, Brazil
3Undergraduate Student, School of Nutrition, UNESP, Botucatu, Brazil
4PhD, Faculty at the Botucatu School of Medicine, UNESP, Department of Urology, Botucatu, Brazil
5PhD, Biosciences Institute, Department of Biostatistics, UNESP, Botucatu, Brazil
Renal lithiasis is a common disease affecting nearly 20% of the world population, and in approximately 95% of cases, it is associated with a metabolic disorder .
Elevated sodium excretion in urine resulting from excessive sodium intake can lead to hypercalciuria and contribute to the formation of urinary stones . Hypercalciuria is the metabolic disorder most frequently found in patients with urinary lithiasis [3,4].
The World Health Organization  recommends that the population in general should consume less than 5 grams/day of salt that is 2 g of Na+, in order to prevent cardiovascular problems such as arterial hypertension, coronary heart disease and stroke. For lithiasic patients, salt intake should be less than 9 grams/day . However, there are no studies evaluating the isolated role played by sodium restriction in the risk for lithogenesis in patients with hypercalciuria.
Food intake evaluation, and of sodium in particular, will provide information for counseling lithiasic patients, thus enabling individualized treatment in order to prevent stone recurrence in the long term.
The aim of this study was to evaluate salt intake in patients with urinary lithiasis and idiopathic hypercalciuria (IH).
From August 2007 to June 2008, 105 lithiasic patients were prospectively studied at the Outpatient Clinic of Renal Lithiasis Metabolism of the Botucatu University Hospital, Unesp. This study was approved by the Bioethics Commission of the School of Medicine - UNESP, Botucatu
Inclusion criteria were: age over 18 years, normal renal function (creatinine clearance ≥ 60 ml/min), absence of proteinuria and negative uroculture at the moment of evaluation. Creatinine clearance was calculated by using the Cockcroft-Gault formula . Pregnant women, patients with intestinal pathologies, chronic diarrhea or using corticoids and diuretics were excluded.
The metabolic investigation protocol consisted of non-consecutive collection of two samples of 24-hour urine for dosages of calcium, sodium, uric acid, citrate, oxalate, magnesium and urinary volume.
The patients were distributed into two groups. Idiopathic hypercalciuria (IH) was considered to be urinary excretion of calcium > 250 mg for women and 300 mg for men with normal serum calcium. Group 1 (n = 55): patients with IH; Group 2 (n = 50): patients with normal urinary excretion of calcium (normocalciuric - NC).
Dietary intake of calcium was calculated by using the three-day dietary record quantitative method and the NutWin software (2002) [8,9]. The measurement of 24-hour urinary sodium excretion is considered to be the gold standard method for data obtained from sodium intakes in population surveys . This method has the advantage of being unaffected by subjective reporting of dietary intakes. Salt intake was estimated by :
|Salt intake (g)=Na+ excretion (mEq/ 24−hour urine)17|
(1 g of salt = 17 mEq amount of sodium).
The Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated and classified according to the World Health Organization .
Student's t test was used for independent samples to compare the groups of patients with calcium and non-calcium urinary lithiasis in relation to the quantitative variables studied when the variable presented adherence to the Gaussian distribution; and the Wilcoxon-Mann Whitney non-parametric test was used in cases of non-adherence. Considering the study of the association between pairs of variables, Pearson's linear correlation was used . Relative risk was calculated by multiple logistic-regression analysis . Differences were considered significant for p value < 0.05.
Among the 105 patients studied, there was homogeneous distribution in both groups regarding mean age, weight, height and BMI. However, it was observed that, on average, according to BMI, patients in both groups were overweight (Table 1).
The mean urinary excretion of sodium, uric acid and magnesium was significantly higher in the IH group than in NC (Table 2).
There was no statistical difference in calcium intake between the groups (Table 3).
Significantly higher salt intake was observed in patients with IH than in NC (Table 3). However, no association was found between urinary excretion of sodium and calcium in both groups. In NC, salt intake was higher than the amount recommended by WHO .
The logistic regression analysis of risk for hypercalciuria in relation to salt intake showed a chance of hypercalciuria that was 3-fold higher in patients whose salt consumption was > 9 g/day.
Urinary lithiasis affects mainly young people in their reproductive period of life, and its control through eating habit changes is important. Epidemiological studies show that the disease is more prevalent in males [13,14]; however, similar studies to ours do not show such remarkable differences regarding gender [15-17]. Our findings are in accordance with the literature and can be explained by the higher female prevalence in the general population.
There was homogeneous distribution of age, weight, height and BMI in both groups; however, overweight was prevalent in both groups. Other authors described [18-22] increased incidence of lithiasis in either obese or overweight patients of both genders. In our study, it was observed that patients with lithiasis were overweight.
Studies have shown that a moderate reduction of salt intake in hypertensive patients may also decrease urinary salt excretion, blood pressure and kidney stone recurrence .
Calciuria induced by increased sodium intake can result from the inhibition of re-absorbency of calcium in the proximal tubule [23,24]. Such calciuria increases nearly 40 mg/100 mEq of supplemental sodium in normal adults' diet, and up to 80 mg in patients with hypercalciuria and urinary stones .
Significantly higher salt intake was observed in patients with IH, and if the amount (< 5 g salt/day) recommended by WHO  is considered, there was increased salt intake in the NC group, which can be determinant in the genesis of cardiovascular diseases. In a randomized trial, Borghi et al.  observed that sodium and animal protein restriction cause reduction in urinary calcium excretion. Curhan et al.  observed a significant correlation between salt intake and recurrence of kidney stones in women. In both groups in this study, higher salt intake than the recommended by WHO  was observed. On the other hand, other authors [20,28-30] observed increased urinary excretion of calcium related to higher sodium intake in normocalciuric patients, which shows that sodium intake control plays an important role in the genesis of lithiasis. In a randomized control trial, Nouvenne et al.  observed that, in some patients, salt intake decrease was associated with a slight reduction in calciuria. This fact can be explained by the fact that there are salt-dependent and salt-independent hypercalciuric patients .
This study will allow an effective attitude towards the control of salt intake, particularly in patients with IH. For this group of patients, the fact that increased liquid consumption associated with dietary counseling and drug therapy will provide clinical control of the lithiasic disease is also noteworthy.
This study showed that salt intake was higher in patients with IH as compared to NC.
IH: Hypercalciuria; NC: Normocalciuric; ml/min: millimeter per minute; BMI: Body Mass Index; VS-Versus; g: grams; mEq: milliequivalents; WHO: World Health Organization; yrs: years; m: meter; kg: kilograms; m2: meter squared; mg/24 h: milligrams per 24 hours; n: number; %: percentage; ml/24 h: millimeter per 24 hours.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
PCGD; CRPRA: assisted with study design; data collection, analysis and interpretation. NBC; ACP: assisted with data collection. JG: assisted with draft manuscript revision. CRP: assisted with statistical analysis. JLA: assisted with method design and manuscript writing. All authors: proofed and approved final manuscript.
|Heilberg IP,Schor N,Santos DR,Cheidde L,Noronha I,Duarte RJ,Brito AH,Mitre AI,Dénes FT,Barata HS,Diretrizes de litíase urinária da sociedade brasileira de nefrologiaJ Bras NefrolYear: 20022420032007|
|Timio F,Kerry SM,Anson KM,Eastwood JB,Cappucio FP,Calcium urolithiasis, blood pressure and salt intakeBlood PressYear: 20031212212710.1080/0803705031000108412797632|
|Amaro CRPR,Amaro JL,Goldberg J,Comportamento do magnésio urinário em pacientes com litíase renalJ Bras NefrolYear: 200527146149|
|Chula DC,Campos RP,Nascimento DE,Carvalho M,Caracterização clínica dos pacientes com hipercalciúria na nefrolitíaseJ Bras NefrolYear: 200627276|
|World Health OrganizationReducing Salt intake in populationsReport of a WHO Forum and Technical MeetingYear: 2007Geneva, World Health Organizationhttp://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/Salt_Report_VC_april07.pdf [cited 2007 apr 16].|
|Baxmann AC,Marques NC,Menon VB,Heilberg IP,Barros E, Gonçalves LFNutrição do paciente com nefrolitíaseNefrologia no consultórioYear: 2007São Paulo: Artmed475483|
|Cockcroft DW,Gault MH,Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinineNephronYear: 197616314110.1159/0001805801244564|
|Burke BS,The dietary history as a tool in researchJ Am Diet AssocYear: 19472310411046|
|Willett WC,Rothman KJ, Greenland SNutritional epidemiologyModern epidemiologyYear: 1998Philadelphia; Lippincott-Raven Publishers623642|
|World Health OrganizationObesity: preventing and managing the global epidemicReport of a WHO Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series 894Year: 2000Geneva: World Health Organizationhttp://www.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?introPage=intro_3.html. [cited 2008 nov 10].|
|Zar JH,Biostatistical analysisYear: 19994New Jersey: Prentice-Hall663|
|Hosmer DW,Lemeshow S,Applied survival analysis: regression modeling of time to event dataYear: 1999New York: John Willey & Sons, Inc299|
|Pak CYC,Kidney stonesLancetYear: 19983511797180110.1016/S0140-6736(98)01295-19635968|
|Pérez FMA,Calderón JG,Herrero JV,Borros GC,Oltra AO,Bisono JRS,Epidemiología de la litiasis urinariaActas Urol EspYear: 20012534134911512258|
|Ayusso LL,Schor N,Avaliação de pacientes com litíase renal em região de clima quenteJ Bras NefrolYear: 200123205212|
|Martín JAL,García JRR,Castro SN,Gómez IR,Rosado EF,Castelo LA,Factores de riesgo metabólico em urolitiasis cálcica según el sexo y edad de los pacientesActas Urol EspYear: 200626111120|
|Amaro CRPR,Goldberg J,Amaro JL,Padovani CR,Metabolic Assessment in Patients with Urinary LithiasisInt Braz J UrolYear: 200531293315763005|
|Martini LA,Heilberg IP,Cuppari L,Medeiros FAM,Draibe AS,Ajzen H,Schor N,Dietary habits of calcium stone formersBraz J Med Biol ResYear: 1993268058128298515|
|Siener R,Glatz S,Nicolay C,Hesse A,The role of overweight and obesity in calcium oxalate stone formationObes ResYear: 20041210611310.1038/oby.2004.1414742848|
|Siener R,Schade N,Nicolay C,Unruh GE,Hesse A,The efficacy of dietary intervention on urinary risk factors for stone formation in recurrent calcium oxalate stone patientsJ UrolYear: 20051731601160510.1097/01.ju.0000154626.16349.d315821507|
|Ekeruo WO,Tan YH,Young MD,Dahm P,Maloney ME,Mathias BJ,Albala DM,Preminger GM,Metabolic risk factors and the impact of medical therapy on the management of nephrolithiasis in obese patientsJ UrolYear: 200417215916310.1097/01.ju.0000128574.50588.9715201761|
|Taylor EN,Stampfer MJ,Curhan GC,Obesity, weight gain and the risk of kidney stonesJAMAYear: 200529345546210.1001/jama.293.4.45515671430|
|Timio F,Kerry SM,Anson KM,Eastwood JB,Cappuccio FP,Calcium urolithiasis, blood pressure and salt intakeBlood PressYear: 20031212212710.1080/0803705031000108412797632|
|Chula DC,Campos RP,Nascimento DE,Carvalho M,Caracterização clínica dos pacientes com hipercalciúria na nefrolitíaseJ Bras NefrolYear: 200627276|
|Massey LK,Whiting SJ,Dietary salt, urinary calcium and kidney stone riskNutr RevYear: 19955313113910.1111/j.1753-4887.1995.tb01536.x7666985|
|Borghi L,Schianchi T,Meschi T,Guerra A,Allegri F,Maggiore U,Novarini A,Comparison of two diets for the prevention of recurrent stones in idiopathic hypercalciuriaN Engl J MedYear: 2002346778410.1056/NEJMoa01036911784873|
|Curhan GC,Willett WC,Speizer FE,Spiegelman D,Stampfer MJ,Comparison of dietary calcium with supplemental calcium and other nutrients as factors affecting the risk for kidney stones in womenAnn Intern MedYear: 19971264975049092314|
|Martini LA,Cuppari L,Colugnati FA,Sigulem DM,Szejnfeld VL,Schor N,High sodium chloride intake is associated with low bone density in calcium stone-forming patientsClin NephrolYear: 200054859310968683|
|Moe OW,Preisig PA,Hypothesizing on the evolutionary origins of salt-induced hypercalciuriaCurr Opin Nephrol HypertensYear: 20051436837210.1097/01.mnh.0000172724.29628.7315931006|
|Heilberg IP,Weisinger JR,Bone disease in idiopathic hypercalciuriaCurr Opin Nephrol HypertensYear: 20061539440210.1097/01.mnh.0000232880.58340.0c16775454|
|Nouvenne A,Meschi T,Prati B,Guerra A,Allegri F,Vezzoli G,Soldati L,Gambaro G,Maggiore U,Borghi L,Effects of a low-salt diet on idiopathic hypercalciuria in calcium-oxalate stone formers: a 3-mo randomized controlled trialAm J Clin NutrYear: 20109156557010.3945/ajcn.2009.2861420042524|
|Z Burtis WJ,Gay L,Insogna KL,Ellison A,Broadus AE,Dietary hypercalciuria in patients with calcium oxalate kidney stonesAm J Clin NutrYear: 1994604244298074077|
Description of the median and standard deviation for age, weight, height and BMI in the different groups studied.
|IH (n = 55)||NC (n = 50)||P value|
|Age (yrs)||42.11 ± 10.61||46.14 ± 11.52||0.064|
|Weight (kg)||77.14 ± 16.03||75.99 ± 15.80||0.712|
|Height (m)||1.64 ± 0.10||1.64 ± 0.08||0.794|
|BMI (kg/m²)||28.78 ± 5.81||28.07 ± 5.27||0.514|
|Males [n (%)]||22 (40)||22 (44)||0.675|
Description of the median and standard deviation for the biochemical characteristics of 24-hour urine in the different groups studied.
|IH (n = 55)||NC (n = 50)||P value|
|Calcium (mg/24 h)||433.33 ± 141.92||188.93 ± 53.09||< 0.001|
|Sodium (mEq/24 h)||280.08 ± 100.94||200.44 ± 65.81||< 0.001|
|Uric acid (mg/24 h)||880.63 ± 281.50||646.74 ± 182.76||< 0.001|
|Magnesium (mg/24 h)||88.78 ± 37.53||64.34 ± 31.84||< 0.001|
|Citrate (mg/24 h)||563.64 ± 505.45||454.89 ± 361.98||0.211|
|Oxalate (mg/24 h)||34.57 ± 23.41||42.40 ± 28.10||0.122|
|Volume (ml/24 h)||1433.5 ± 474.8||1314.4 ± 392.4||0.166|
Description of the median and standard deviation for the composition of daily dietary intake in the different groups studied.
|Nutrient||IH (n = 55)||NC (n = 50)||P value|
|Calcium (mg)||520.13 ± 245.62||531.44 ± 299.48||0.832|
|Salt (g)*||16.47 ± 5.93||11.79 ± 3.87||< 0.001|
* Based on 24-hour urine
Previous Document: Genetic dissection of maize phenology using an intraspecific introgression library.
Next Document: The use of MRI apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in monitoring the development of brain infarctio...