Document Detail


A review of reporting of participant recruitment and retention in RCTs in six major journals.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19591685     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Poor recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is problematic but common. Clear and detailed reporting of participant flow is essential to assess the generalisability and comparability of RCTs. Despite improved reporting since the implementation of the CONSORT statement, important problems remain. This paper aims: (i) to update and extend previous reviews evaluating reporting of participant recruitment and retention in RCTs; (ii) to quantify the level of participation throughout RCTs.
METHODS: We reviewed all reports of RCTs of health care interventions and/or processes with individual randomisation, published July-December 2004 in six major journals. Short, secondary or interim reports, and Phase I/II trials were excluded. Data recorded were: general RCT details; inclusion of flow diagram; participant flow throughout trial; reasons for non-participation/withdrawal; target sample sizes.
RESULTS: 133 reports were reviewed. Overall, 79% included a flow diagram, but over a third were incomplete. The majority reported the flow of participants at each stage of the trial after randomisation. However, 40% failed to report the numbers assessed for eligibility. Percentages of participants retained at each stage were high: for example, 90% of eligible individuals were randomised, and 93% of those randomised were outcome assessed. On average, trials met their sample size targets. However, there were some substantial shortfalls: for example 21% of trials reporting a sample size calculation failed to achieve adequate numbers at randomisation, and 48% at outcome assessment. Reporting of losses to follow up was variable and difficult to interpret.
CONCLUSION: The majority of RCTs reported the flow of participants well after randomisation, although only two-thirds included a complete flow chart and there was great variability over the definition of "lost to follow up". Reporting of participant eligibility was poor, making assessments of recruitment practice and external validity difficult. Reporting of participant flow throughout RCTs could be improved by small changes to the CONSORT chart.
Authors:
Merran Toerien; Sara T Brookes; Chris Metcalfe; Isabel de Salis; Zelda Tomlin; Tim J Peters; Jonathan Sterne; Jenny L Donovan
Related Documents :
2220675 - Special report. immunocytochemistry in diagnostic cytology: a 12-year perspective.
19820865 - Characteristics of fatigue in heart failure patients: a literature review.
21958445 - Safe use of electroconvulsive therapy in a highly suicidal survivor of carbon monoxide ...
22415385 - Operative case of langerhans'cell histiocytosis of the skull with dural invasion. an im...
15823925 - Chromosomal abnormalities and glaucoma: a case of congenital glaucoma with trisomy 8q22...
17975805 - Fatal case of bilateral internal jugular vein thrombosis following ivig infusion in an ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2009-07-10
Journal Detail:
Title:  Trials     Volume:  10     ISSN:  1745-6215     ISO Abbreviation:  Trials     Publication Date:  2009  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-07-30     Completed Date:  2009-09-18     Revised Date:  2014-02-19    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101263253     Medline TA:  Trials     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  52     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Clinical Trials Data Monitoring Committees
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Patient Dropouts*
Patient Selection*
Peer Review, Research
Periodicals as Topic
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / standards*,  statistics & numerical data*
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
G0800800//Medical Research Council; MC_U145079312//Medical Research Council; //Medical Research Council
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Chemomodulation of human dendritic cell function by antineoplastic agents in low noncytotoxic concen...
Next Document:  Radiation-induced cancer after radiotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the head and neck: a retro...