Document Detail


Is a return to baseline sexual function possible? An analysis of sexual function outcomes following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21107844     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: Outcome measures following radical prostatectomy are not standardized. Though excellent potency rates are widely reported, few studies address a return to baseline function. We analyze validated sexual health-related quality-of-life outcomes by a strict definition, a return to baseline function, and compare them to less stringent, yet more frequently referenced, categorical definitions of potency.
METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy from April 2001 to September 2007 completed the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire at baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. We defined a return to baseline as a recovery to greater than one-half standard deviation of the studied population below the patient's own baseline (clinically detectable threshold). We compared these outcomes to a categorical definition of potency involving intercourse frequency. To limit confounders, we performed subset analyses of preoperatively potent men who received bilateral nerve preservation. Factors predictive of return to baseline function were assessed in multivariable analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 568 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age and follow-up were 57.2 years and 16.9 months, respectively. Using the categorical definition, 85% of preoperatively potent men with bilateral nerve preservation were "potent" at 24 months; however, only 27% returned to their baseline sexual function. In multivariable analyses baseline function, number of nerves spared, and age were independent predictors of a return to baseline function.
CONCLUSION: While most preoperatively potent men who receive bilateral nerve preservation engage in intercourse postoperatively, few return to their baseline sexual function. We believe that these data provide context for the expectations of patients who elect extirpative therapy.
Authors:
Adam W Levinson; Hugh J Lavery; Nicholas T Ward; Li-Ming Su; Christian P Pavlovich
Related Documents :
2510274 - Drug safety of rioprostil in patients with active gastric or duodenal ulcer.
3328284 - Treatment of peptic ulcers--acid reduction or cytoprotection?
2860494 - Comparison of tri-potassium di-citrato bismuthate tablets with ranitidine in healing an...
3881014 - A comparison of cimetidine and sucralfate in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers.
9773214 - Asymptomatic esophageal varices should be endoscopically treated.
22468254 - Comparing the efficacy of alkaline nasal douches versus decongestant nasal drops in pos...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2010-11-24
Journal Detail:
Title:  World journal of urology     Volume:  29     ISSN:  1433-8726     ISO Abbreviation:  World J Urol     Publication Date:  2011 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-01-21     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8307716     Medline TA:  World J Urol     Country:  Germany    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  29-34     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Urology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 5 East 98th St., 6th floor, Box 1272, New York, NY, 10029, USA, doctorlevinson@gmail.com.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Impact of the primary Gleason pattern on biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostate...
Next Document:  Intraoperative sentinel node identification and sampling in clinically node-negative renal cell carc...