Document Detail

The reliability of the Neonatal Oral-Motor Assessment Scale.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  18201309     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECTIVES: Sucking problems in preterm infants can be specified by means of visual observation. The Neonatal Oral-Motor Assessment Scale (NOMAS) is the visual observation method most commonly used to assess the non-nutritive sucking (NNS) and nutritive sucking (NS) skills of infants up to approximately 8 weeks postterm. During the first 2 min of a regular feeding the infant's sucking skill is assessed, either immediately or on video. Although NOMAS has been used since 1993, little is known about the method's reliability. The aim of our study was to determine the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of NOMAS. METHODS: The 75 infants included in this study were born at 26-36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA). Four observers participated in the study. They were trained and certified to administer NOMAS in the Netherlands by M.M. Palmer between 2000 and 2002. RESULTS: We found the test-retest agreement of NOMAS to be 'fair' to 'almost perfect' (Cohen's kappa [kappa] between 0.33 and 0.94), whereas the inter-rater agreement with respect to the diagnosis was 'moderate' to 'substantial' (Cohen's kappa, between 0.40 and 0.65). As a diagnostic tool, however, the current version of NOMAS cannot be used for both full-term and preterm infants. For a measuring instrument such as NOMAS, one should aim at reliability coefficients for inter-rater and test-retest agreement of at least 0.8. A Cohen's kappa of 0.6 or less we find unacceptable. Nonetheless, by observing sucking and swallowing according to a protocol much useful information can be gathered about the development of an infant's sucking skills. For instance, whether the infant is able to co-ordinate sucking and swallowing, whether the infant can maintain sucking, swallowing and breathing during the continuous phase and whether the infant is able to suck rhythmically with equally long bursts. In addition, NOMAS offers useful aids for intervention. CONCLUSIONS: NOMAS should be re-adjusted in order to improve inter-rater agreement, and at the same time current insights into the development of sucking and swallowing should be incorporated in the method.
Saakje P da Costa; Cees P van der Schans
Related Documents :
23901779 - Differences in the nonverbal requests of great apes and human infants.
6644459 - Development of suck and swallow.
12177569 - Feeding patterns of full-term and preterm infants at forty weeks postconceptional age.
1733819 - Oral-motor dysfunction and feeding disorders of infants with turner syndrome.
9733129 - D-allothreonine has no growth promoting efficacy for chicks.
18769379 - Oropharyngeal administration of colostrum to extremely low birth weight infants: theore...
6877589 - Observation on peritumoural oedema in meningioma. part i: distribution, spread and reso...
6812389 - Embryotoxicity of industrial chemicals on the chicken embryo: thiourea derivatives.
19887819 - Does induced abortion increase the risk of preterm birth? results from a case-control s...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)     Volume:  97     ISSN:  0803-5253     ISO Abbreviation:  Acta Paediatr.     Publication Date:  2008 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2008-01-18     Completed Date:  2008-04-21     Revised Date:  2008-11-21    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9205968     Medline TA:  Acta Paediatr     Country:  Norway    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  21-6     Citation Subset:  IM    
School for Health Care Studies, Hanze University Groningen, University for Applied Sciences, Eyssoniusplein 18, 9714 CE Groningen, The Netherlands.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Feeding Behavior / classification*,  physiology
Infant Behavior / classification*,  physiology
Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature
Neurologic Examination / instrumentation*
Neuropsychological Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Sucking Behavior / classification*,  physiology

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Practical difficulties in the diagnosis of transient non-ketotic hyperglycinaemia.
Next Document:  Association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and breastfeeding behaviour.