Document Detail

The relative accuracy of sequential same-arm and simultaneous opposite-arm measurements for the intra-arterial validation of blood pressure monitors.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  10450119     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of simultaneous opposite-arm and sequential same-arm intra-arterial validation of automated blood pressure monitors. DESIGN: Intra-arterial blood pressure measurements were compared with blood pressure measurements obtained using conventional sphygmomanometry and two automated blood pressure monitors (the Dinamap XL and the SpaceLabs Scout) using a methodology based on the protocol published by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) for the intra-arterial validation of automated monitors. METHODS: Thirteen women with radial arterial lines were recruited from the obstetric intensive care unit at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town. For each woman, intra-arterial blood pressure measurements were compared with those obtained by mercury sphygmomanometry and by using the two automated blood pressure monitors with both a sequential same-arm protocol and a simultaneous opposite-arm protocol. The mean and SD of the differences was calculated for each protocol and the results were compared using Student s t test. RESULTS: The differences between the 'means of the differences' for these two protocols never differed by more than 2 mmHg. For individuals the differences between data obtained using the two methodologies were up to 32 mmHg for mercury sphygmomanometry and 18 mmHg for the automated monitors. The differences between the SD of the differences were all less than 3 mmHg except for that of systolic blood pressure obtained by mercury sphygmomanometry, which was 7 mmHg CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that a sequential same-arm and a simultaneous opposite-arm comparison of intra-arterial and indirect blood pressure measurements yield similar results.
J A Penny; A H Shennan; A W Halligan; D J Taylor; M de Swiet; J Anthony
Related Documents :
1877599 - The hypertension prevention trial: assessment of the quality of blood pressure measurem...
8676369 - An automated system for the functional evaluation of oscillometric non-invasive blood p...
23832349 - Regulation of cytochrome c- and quinol oxidases, and piezotolerance of their activities...
10647359 - 'putting the pressure on': a study of compression sleeves used in breast cancer-related...
9216149 - A mathematical study of some biomechanical factors affecting the oscillometric blood pr...
23300969 - High altitude bird migration at temperate latitudes: a synoptic perspective on wind ass...
4764429 - Systemic arterial baroreceptors in ducks and the consequences of their denervation on s...
18182959 - Moc-pssm cme article: pressure sores.
22836599 - Genome dynamics in three different geographical isolates of white spot syndrome virus (...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Blood pressure monitoring     Volume:  4     ISSN:  1359-5237     ISO Abbreviation:  Blood Press Monit     Publication Date:  1999 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1999-10-12     Completed Date:  1999-10-12     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9606438     Medline TA:  Blood Press Monit     Country:  ENGLAND    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  91-5     Citation Subset:  IM    
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Queen Charlotte's Hospital, London, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Blood Pressure*
Blood Pressure Determination / instrumentation,  methods*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Temporal stability of ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate in youths.
Next Document:  The effect of crossing legs on blood pressure: a randomized single-blind cross-over study.