Document Detail


The relation between gap detection, loudness, and loudness growth in noise-masked normal-hearing listeners.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  9035396     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Gap detection was measured for 50 and 1000-Hz-wide noise markers arithmetically centered on 1000 Hz. The markers were presented in a lowpass background noise having a high-frequency cutoff of 2000 Hz. The pressure spectrum level of the background noise was either 0 or 40 dB/Hz. Gap detection was determined at sensation levels (SLs) of 10, 15, 20, and 30 dB in the 0-dB/Hz background, and at SLs of 10, 15, and 20 dB in the 40-dB/Hz background. Because loudness increased more steeply in the higher level noise background, the markers in the 40-dB/Hz background were at higher loudness (and at a steeper portion of the loudness growth function) than markers in the 0-dB/Hz background, for markers matched in terms of SL. The main goal of the experiment was to determine whether gap detection would be relatively poor at steep portions of the loudness growth function due to the gap being confused with ongoing random dips. Such confusion might be particularly great when the noise bandwidth was narrow (and therefore characterized by prominent fluctuation) and the growth of loudness was steep. Gap detection was poorer for the 50-Hz-wide marker than for the 1000-Hz-wide marker. For a given marker bandwidth at a given SL, gap detection was similar whether the marker was presented in the 0-dB/Hz noise or the 40-dB/Hz noise. Supplementary conditions indicated that (1) gap detection results for 50-Hz-wide markers presented at equal SL's were also similar between a 0-dB/Hz noise background and a 55-dB/Hz noise background, and that (2) gap detection for 50- and 1000-Hz-wide markers was poorer in a 40-dB/Hz background than in a 0-dB/Hz background when markers were matched for loudness. The results generally indicated similar gap detection thresholds for markers presented at similar SLs across a relatively wide range of background noise levels. Gap detection was related more closely to the marker-to-noise ratio than to the loudness relation between markers or the steepness of loudness growth.
Authors:
J W Hall; J H Grose
Related Documents :
9808726 - Induction of acclimative proteolysis of the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b protein of...
3351126 - Comodulation masking release for multicomponent signals.
10883966 - Detection of incremental and decremental bars at different locations across mach bands ...
19590396 - Neural process underlying gap detection for spectrally rich and asymmetrical markers.
3660596 - Visual receptive field properties in the posterior suprasylvian cortex of the cat: a co...
1249526 - Stimulus generalization: some predictions from a model of pavlovian conditioning.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Controlled Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America     Volume:  101     ISSN:  0001-4966     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Acoust. Soc. Am.     Publication Date:  1997 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1997-03-19     Completed Date:  1997-03-19     Revised Date:  2007-11-14    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7503051     Medline TA:  J Acoust Soc Am     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1044-9     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Division of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina Medical School, Chapel Hill 27599-7070, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Auditory Threshold
Female
Hearing*
Humans
Loudness Perception*
Male
Noise*
Perceptual Masking*
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
R01DC00418/DC/NIDCD NIH HHS

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  On the Duifhuis pitch effect.
Next Document:  Monaural sound localization revisited.