Document Detail

A randomized trial comparing compression, Perclose Proglide and Angio-Seal VIP for arterial closure following percutaneous coronary intervention: the CAP trial.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  18098171     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECTIVE: This prospective randomized trial compared the Angio-Seal VIP with Perclose Proglide and to manual compression with respect to time to hemostasis and ambulation, patient satisfaction, and vascular complications following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The use of arterial closure devices for the reduction of vascular complications following PCI remains controversial. There have been no head to head trials comparing these most commonly used arterial closure devices following PCI. METHODS: Two hundred patients undergoing PCI were randomized to manual compression, Perclose Proglide or Angio-Seal VIP. Ambulation was allowed 3 hr after Perclose Proglide or Angio-Seal VIP and 6 hr after compression. RESULTS: There were 10 failures to deploy Perclose Proglide and none for Angio-Sealt (P < 0.01). Time to hemostasis was significantly shorter with Angio-Seal VIP compared with Perclose Proglide (5.3 vs. 46.8 min, P < 0.01). Time to ambulation was shorter with Angio-Seal VIP than with Perclose Proglide (261 vs. 334 min, P < 0.05) and the time to ambulation, as expected, was longest with compression (943 min, P < 0.01 vs. Angio-Seal VIP and Perclose Proglide). Delay in ambulation was higher with Perclose Proglide than with Angio-Seal VIP (18 vs. 9, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in major vascular complications between groups. Compared with compression, patient discomfort was significantly improved with Angio-Seal (1.5 vs. 2.0, P < 0.01), but not with Perclose Proglide. CONCLUSION: The Angio-Seal VIPtrade mark device has a high rate of deployment success, which is significantly better than that of Perclose Proglide. Angio-Seal VIP allows for earlier hemostasis and ambulation compared with both compression and Perclose Proglide and is associated with greater patient satisfaction compared with compression.
Jack L Martin; Antonis Pratsos; Edward Magargee; Kim Mayhew; Catherine Pensyl; Mary Nunn; Francis Day; Timothy Shapiro
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions     Volume:  71     ISSN:  1522-726X     ISO Abbreviation:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv     Publication Date:  2008 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-12-26     Completed Date:  2008-02-15     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100884139     Medline TA:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1-5     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Main Line Health, Bryn Mawr Hospital, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, USA. MartinJ@MLHS.ORG
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary*
Catheterization, Peripheral
Early Ambulation
Femoral Artery / surgery
Hemostasis, Surgical / instrumentation*,  methods
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Prospective Studies
Time Factors
Comment In:
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Jan 1;71(1):6-7   [PMID:  18098174 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Using indirect covariance spectra to identify artifact responses in unsymmetrical indirect covarianc...
Next Document:  Effects of net charge and the number of positively charged residues on the biological activity of am...