Document Detail


A randomized double-blind, cross-over study of the linear and nonlinear algorithms for the QT sensing rate adaptive pacemaker.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  1704545     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
We have compared the pacing rate responses during cardiopulmonary exercise testing in 11 patients (mean 59 years, six female) with implanted QT sensing rate adaptive pacemakers who were randomly programmed to 1-month periods in the linear and nonlinear algorithms using a double-blind, cross-over design. Exercise testing was performed at the end of each month block and symptoms were scored with the MacMaster questionnaire. With exercise, the time to a 10 beats/min increment in rate was significantly less with the nonlinear compared to the linear algorithm (126 sec vs 255 sec, P = 0.02) but there were no significant differences in exercise duration, the peak pacing rate, the peak VO2, the VO2 at the anaerobic threshold or the mean correlation coefficients of the pacing rate VO2 relationship. Rate oscillation occurred in seven patients in the linear algorithm and in two patients in the nonlinear setting. Initial deceleration of the pacing rate at the onset of exercise occurred in seven patients in the linear algorithm and in four patients in the nonlinear setting. The nonlinear algorithm is associated with a faster response time during exercise and fewer instances of rate instability. However, it has not overcome the problem of a dip in the pacing rate at the beginning of exercise. The major difference in the function of the two algorithms is faster initial acceleration with the nonlinear algorithm. This is explained by the significantly higher values of the slope setting at the lower rate limit for the nonlinear versus the linear algorithm (6.3 ms/ms vs 5.1 ms/ms).
Authors:
M W Baig; A Green; G Wade; E Kovanci; P D Constable; E J Perrins
Related Documents :
16943865 - Impact of a right ventricular impedance sensor on the cardiovascular responses to exerc...
15338245 - Role of force--frequency relation during av-block, sinus node block and beta-adrenocept...
8880795 - A randomized, single-blind crossover comparison of the effects of chronic ddd and dual ...
10413375 - Characteristics, circuit, mechanism, and ablation of reentry in the rabbit atrioventric...
2108465 - Distance between homes and exercise facilities related to frequency of exercise among s...
9360565 - Restraint position and positional asphyxia.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE     Volume:  13     ISSN:  0147-8389     ISO Abbreviation:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol     Publication Date:  1990 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1991-03-19     Completed Date:  1991-03-19     Revised Date:  2008-11-21    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7803944     Medline TA:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1802-8     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Cardiology, General Infirmary, Leeds, England, United Kingdom.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Aged
Algorithms*
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial / methods*
Double-Blind Method
Electrocardiography*
Epinephrine / blood
Exercise Test
Female
Heart Rate / physiology*
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Norepinephrine / blood
Oxygen Consumption
Pacemaker, Artificial*
Physical Exertion / physiology
Prospective Studies
Time Factors
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
51-41-2/Norepinephrine; 51-43-4/Epinephrine

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Circadian rate variation in rate-adaptive pacing systems.
Next Document:  Relationship between right atrial and mixed venous oxygen saturation and heart rate during exercise ...