Document Detail

A randomized controlled clinical trial of palliative therapies for patients with inoperable esophageal cancer.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19436289     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECTIVES: A dramatic rise in incidence, an aging population, and expensive palliative treatments have led to an escalating burden on clinicians managing inoperable esophageal cancer with only limited evidence of effectiveness. This study compares the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) with other palliative therapies to aid clinicians in making an evidence-based treatment choice.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical trial with 215 patients followed until death or study closure. The primary outcome measures were dysphagia, quality of life (QL) 6 weeks following treatment, and total cost of treatment. Secondary outcome measures included treatment-associated morbidity, mortality, survival, and cost-effectiveness. An intention-to-treat analysis was carried out.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference in mean dysphagia grade between treatment arms 6 weeks following treatment (P=0.046), with worse swallowing reported by rigid stent-treated patients (mean dysphagia score difference=-0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.10 to -0.89, P=0.014). Global QL scores were lower at both 1 and 6 weeks following treatment for patients treated by SEMSs (mean difference QL index week 1=-0.66; 95% CI: -0.02 to -1.30, P=0.04; mean difference QL index week 6=-1.01; 95% CI -0.30 to -1.72, P=0.006). These findings were associated with higher post-procedure pain scores in the SEMS patient group (mean difference of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ C-30 pain symptom score at week 1=11.13; 95% CI: 2.89-19.4; P=0.01). Although mean EQ-5D QL values differed between the treatments (P<0.001), this difference dissipated following generation of quality-adjusted life year values. Total costs varied between treatment arms but these findings canceled out when SEMSs were compared with non-SEMS therapies (95% CI -845.15-1,332.62). These results were robust to sensitivity analysis. There were no differences in the in-hospital mortality or early complication rates, but late complications were more frequent after rigid stenting (risk ratio=2.47; 95% CI 1.88-3.04). There was a survival advantage for non-stent-treated patients (log-rank statistic=4.21, P=0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: The treatment choice for patients with inoperable esophageal cancer should be between a SEMS or a non-stent treatment after consideration has been given to both patient and tumor characteristics and clinician and patient preferences.
Jonathan Shenfine; Paul McNamee; Nick Steen; John Bond; S Michael Griffin
Related Documents :
22898909 - Homoharringtonine is an effective therapy for patients with polycythemia vera or essent...
15019339 - Surgery for trichiasis by ophthalmologists versus integrated eye care workers: a random...
22834939 - Outcomes of intra-renal bcg/ifn for biopsy-proven upper-tract carcinoma in situ.
20959789 - Adverse events and their relation to mortality in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patien...
22663759 - The effect of telephone consultation on the quality of life of patients receiving inter...
21691139 - Safety and efficacy of fibrin glue versus vicryl sutures in recurrent pterygium with am...
24752709 - Patterns of treatment and associated short-term outcomes of unruptured intracranial ane...
22898909 - Homoharringtonine is an effective therapy for patients with polycythemia vera or essent...
9570259 - Changes in helicobacter pylori-induced gastritis in the antrum and corpus during 12 mon...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2009-05-12
Journal Detail:
Title:  The American journal of gastroenterology     Volume:  104     ISSN:  1572-0241     ISO Abbreviation:  Am. J. Gastroenterol.     Publication Date:  2009 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-07-03     Completed Date:  2009-07-24     Revised Date:  2011-01-26    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0421030     Medline TA:  Am J Gastroenterol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1674-85     Citation Subset:  IM    
Northern Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use
Balloon Dilation / instrumentation
Cause of Death
Confidence Intervals
Critical Illness / therapy
Decision Making
Deglutition Disorders / etiology,  therapy*
Esophageal Neoplasms / complications,  mortality*,  pathology,  therapy*
Evidence-Based Medicine
Geriatric Assessment
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Neoplasm Invasiveness / pathology
Palliative Care / methods*
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life*
Risk Assessment
Severity of Illness Index
Statistics, Nonparametric
Survival Analysis
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Comment In:
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jan;18(1):286; author reply 287-8   [PMID:  20526687 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Pancreatic ductal abnormalities documented by secretin-enhanced MRCP in asymptomatic subjects with c...
Next Document:  C-reactive protein haplotype is associated with high PSA as a marker of metastatic prostate cancer b...