Document Detail

A randomized comparison of gasless laparoscopy and CO2 pneumoperitoneum.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  9277655     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECTIVE: To determine if the theoretic advantages of gasless laparoscopy are realized in direct comparison to laparoscopy with pneumoperitoneum. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery chose to participate in this trial and were randomized after the induction of general anesthesia. Twenty-nine of the 57 patients were randomized to the pneumoperitoneum group. Of the 28 patients in the gasless group, six were converted to pneumoperitoneum because of inadequate exposure. The adequacy of exposure and ease of surgery were assessed with a subjective score, and the times to exposure and for incision closure were recorded. Various anesthetic factors were measured. Patients completed an analog pain score in the recovery area and for the first 5 postoperative days. Analgesic and antiemetic use also was recorded, as was the number of days to return to normal activity. RESULTS: Times to achieve exposure and close incisions were longer, and exposure and ease of surgery were worse in the gasless group. Patients in the gasless group had lower diastolic blood pressure, minute ventilation, peak inspiratory pressures, and end tidal pCO2. There were no differences in body temperature, systolic blood pressure or heart rate, postoperative pain scores, analgesic or antiemetic use, or times to hospital discharge or return to activity between the groups. CONCLUSION: Performing laparoscopy using the Laparolift device compromised surgical exposure and thus increased technical difficulty. Patients realized no benefits from its use in terms of postoperative discomfort or return to activity. Eliminating the pneumoperitoneum allowed lower minute ventilation and peak inspiratory pressures, and end tidal pCO2 was lower. Although the concept of gasless laparoscopy holds appeal, the current prototype is not well-suited for infertility procedures.
J M Goldberg; W G Maurer
Related Documents :
10839905 - Intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal carbon dioxide insufflation evoke different effects...
11043915 - Gastric tonometry and intramucosal ph--theoretical principles and clinical application.
2501285 - High-frequency ventilation-induced apnea: interaction of frequency, volume, frc, and co2.
8615505 - Hemodynamic changes after retroperitoneal co2 insufflation for posterior retroperitoneo...
7223905 - Cardiovascular reflexes elicited by passive gastric distension in anesthetized cats.
10388635 - The influence of experience on the reproducibility of the ankle-brachial systolic press...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Obstetrics and gynecology     Volume:  90     ISSN:  0029-7844     ISO Abbreviation:  Obstet Gynecol     Publication Date:  1997 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1997-09-26     Completed Date:  1997-09-26     Revised Date:  2009-10-26    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0401101     Medline TA:  Obstet Gynecol     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  416-20     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Carbon Monoxide
Laparoscopy / adverse effects,  methods*
Pneumoperitoneum, Artificial / adverse effects,  methods*
Reg. No./Substance:
630-08-0/Carbon Monoxide

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Open compared with laparoscopic approach to Burch colposuspension: a cost analysis.
Next Document:  Effectiveness of the Papanicolaou smear and speculoscopy as compared with the Papanicolaou smear alo...