Document Detail


A randomised controlled trial of general practitioner safety advice for families with children under 5 years.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  9596598     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness of general practitioner advice about child safety, and provision of low cost safety equipment to low income families, on use of safety equipment and safe practices at home.
DESIGN: Randomised, unblinded, controlled trial with initial assessment and six week follow up by telephone survey. Twenty families from intervention and control groups were randomly selected for a home visit to assess validity of responses to second survey.
SETTING: A general practice in Nottingham.
SUBJECTS: 98% (165/169) of families with children aged under 5 years registered with the practice.
INTERVENTIONS: General practitioner safety advice plus, for families receiving means tested state benefits, access to safety equipment at low cost. Control families received usual care.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Possession and use of safety equipment and safe practices at home.
RESULTS: Before intervention, the two groups differed only in possession of fireguards. After intervention, significantly more families in intervention group used fireguards (relative risk 1.89, 95% confidence interval 1.18 to 2.94), smoke alarms (1.14, 1.04 to 1.25), socket covers (1.27, 1.10 to 1.48), locks on cupboards for storing cleaning materials (1.38, 1.02 to 1.88), and door slam devices (3.60, 2.17 to 5.97). Also, significantly more families in intervention group showed very safe practice in storage of sharp objects (1.98, 1.38 to 2.83), storage of medicines (1.15, 1.03 to 1.28), window safety (1.30, 1.06 to 1.58), fireplace safety (1.84, 1.34 to 2.54), socket safety (1.77, 1.37 to 2.28), smoke alarm safety (1.11, 1.01 to 1.22), and door slam safety (7.00, 3.15 to 15.6). Stratifying results by receipt of state benefits showed that intervention was at least as effective in families receiving benefits as others.
CONCLUSIONS: General practitioner advice, coupled with access to low cost equipment for low income families, increased use of safety equipment and other safe practices. These findings are encouraging for provision of injury prevention in primary care.
Authors:
M Clamp; D Kendrick
Related Documents :
11696128 - Anaesthesia in a child with hutchinson-gildford progeria.
12046778 - Proper use of child safety seats.
9545078 - Bicoronal synostosis in a child from historic omaha cemetery 25dk10.
22400468 - Evaluation of a substance abuse, hiv and hepatitis prevention initiative for urban nati...
21565528 - Racial/ethnic differences in breastfeeding duration among wic-eligible families.
8668498 - Relationships between leisure time physical activity and perceived stress.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  BMJ (Clinical research ed.)     Volume:  316     ISSN:  0959-8138     ISO Abbreviation:  BMJ     Publication Date:  1998 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1998-06-04     Completed Date:  1998-06-04     Revised Date:  2013-04-17    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8900488     Medline TA:  BMJ     Country:  ENGLAND    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1576-9     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Colwick Vale Surgery, Colwick, Nottingham NG4 2DU.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Accidents, Home / prevention & control*
Child Welfare
Child, Preschool
Counseling*
England
Family Health
Family Practice*
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Protective Devices / utilization
Questionnaires
Safety*
Socioeconomic Factors
Wounds and Injuries / prevention & control*
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Morbidity and healthcare utilisation of children in households with one adult: comparative observati...
Next Document:  Rhizobium nod factor signaling. Evidence for a g protein-mediated transduction mechanism