Document Detail


A prospective study of the repeated use of sterilized papillotomes and retrieval baskets for ERCP: quality and cost analysis.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  9040995     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: The impact on instrument quality and cost of the practice of reusing ERCP accessories has not been fully addressed. METHODS: Twenty-five new papillotomes and 15 new retrieval baskets were labeled and evaluated over time by staff blinded to the number of prior uses. Instruments were scored as to their function for the designated task. The cost of this practice was calculated from the purchase price of accessories and the costs of cleaning, sterilization, and disposal, and then compared with the estimated cost of a practice of one-time use of similar instruments. RESULTS: Twenty-five papillotomes were used 246 times (median 8; mean 9.8). Fifteen retrieval baskets were used 193 times (median 13; mean 12.9). The median survival of both papillotomes and baskets before being considered inadequate (score < 6 out of 10) was 9 uses. There were no complications attributable to using reused equipment. The projected yearly cost savings of using reusable versus disposable instruments was $94,095 for papillotomes and $61,809 for baskets, a 475% and 322% cost reduction, respectively. CONCLUSION: The papillotomes and baskets in this study could be reused reliably and safely multiple times, with considerable cost savings compared with the practice of using disposable instruments.
Authors:
J Cohen; G B Haber; P Kortan; J A Dorais; D M Scheider; M Cirocco; J Habib
Related Documents :
11286425 - An overview of experiences of wisconsin dairy farmers who modernized their operations.
21378085 - Shared decision making after macintyre.
2116045 - Containing medicines costs in the private sector--the example of a medical benefit scheme.
22761745 - Malpractice liability and defensive medicine: a national survey of neurosurgeons.
12029935 - Leading into the future: coaching and mentoring generation x employees.
21824055 - Bringing greater transparency to "black box" warnings.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Gastrointestinal endoscopy     Volume:  45     ISSN:  0016-5107     ISO Abbreviation:  Gastrointest. Endosc.     Publication Date:  1997 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1997-05-15     Completed Date:  1997-05-15     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0010505     Medline TA:  Gastrointest Endosc     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  122-7     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Wellesley Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde / economics*,  instrumentation*
Cost Control
Costs and Cost Analysis
Disposable Equipment
Equipment Contamination
Equipment Design
Equipment Reuse / economics,  statistics & numerical data
Equipment Safety
Humans
Prospective Studies
Quality Control
Statistics, Nonparametric
Sterilization
Survival Analysis
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Gastrointest Endosc. 1997 Feb;45(2):211-3   [PMID:  9041017 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  In vitro evaluation of wire integrity and ability to reprocess single-use sphincterotomes.
Next Document:  A new system for defining endoscopic complications emphasizing the measure of importance.