Document Detail

A prospective controlled assessment of microdermabrasion for damaged skin and fine rhytides.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15060359     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Aged skin is characterized by rhytides but also by epidermal and dermal atrophy, rough skin texture, irregular pigmentation, telangiectasias, and laxity. Microdermabrasion is an office-based mechanical resurfacing technique alternative to traditional dermabrasion. It has been used in Europe since 1992 with great acceptance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and quantify the degree of visible improvement in photodamaged skin and fine rhytides following a series of microdermabrasion treatments. A single operator treated 20 patients with varying degrees of photodamage and rhytides with a series of eight microdermabrasion treatments at 1-week intervals; 17 subjects completed the entire study protocol. Standardized photographic documentation was performed before and after each treatment, and a survey questionnaire was completed by each subject. Punch biopsy specimens (3 mm) were collected on treated and matched nontreated control sites and evaluated for histological characteristics. Preprocedure and postprocedure photographs were rated on a 5-point scale by independent blinded observers. A total of 30 blinded observers (16 plastic surgeons and 14 laypersons) rated all photographs. The results showed that all observers rated a significant improvement of hyperchromic discoloration (p = 0.004), while only nonmedical observers observed improvement in fine rhytides. All patients were very satisfied with the results. Common side effects were mild to moderate discomfort occurring on bony areas during the treatment and an itching and tingling sensation for 2 days after treatment. No infections or scars were observed postoperatively. The average epidermal thickness in the untreated samples was 103 +/- 23 microM (mean +/- SD) before treatment compared with 148 +/- 41 microM after treatment (p < 0.001). Histologic analysis of the matched punch biopsy specimens showed an increase in organized collagen in treated versus nontreated sites. Treatment of aged skin using a series of microdermabrasion treatments is an effective, noninvasive method of skin rejuvenation with minimal risk and patient downtime. It is safe and improves skin quality by minimizing certain hyperchromic pigmentations.
Maria Coimbra; Rod J Rohrich; James Chao; Spencer A Brown
Related Documents :
16394379 - Tolerance and safety of superficial chemical peeling with salicylic acid in various fac...
20944249 - Treatment of stable and recalcitrant depigmented skin conditions by autologous punch gr...
22177169 - Nomograms to predict patency after microsurgical vasectomy reversal.
14692529 - Poems syndrome: experience with fourteen cases.
12956679 - The presence of trichodynia in patients with telogen effluvium and androgenetic alopecia.
20848639 - Long-term fine caliber hair removal with an electro-optic q-switched nd:yag laser.
21553169 - Effectiveness of endoclips for the treatment of stigmata of recent hemorrhage in the co...
12476499 - The effect of long-term mandibular advancement on the hyoid bone and pharynx as it rela...
20806759 - Arthroscopic treatment of pigmented villonodular synovitis involving bilateral shoulders.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Plastic and reconstructive surgery     Volume:  113     ISSN:  0032-1052     ISO Abbreviation:  Plast. Reconstr. Surg.     Publication Date:  2004 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2004-04-02     Completed Date:  2004-05-11     Revised Date:  2014-10-13    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  1306050     Medline TA:  Plast Reconstr Surg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1438-43; discussion 1444     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Dermabrasion* / methods
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Rhytidoplasty / methods*
Skin / pathology
Skin Aging
Skin Pigmentation
Treatment Outcome

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Face transplantation: where do we stand?
Next Document:  Nasal osteotomies: a clinical comparison of the perforating methods versus the continuous technique.