Document Detail


A propensity score-adjusted retrospective comparison of early and mid-term results of mitral valve repair versus replacement in octogenarians.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20846993     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Aims Feasibility and efficacy of mitral repair in the elderly remain controversial. This study aims to compare outcomes of mitral repair and replacement in octogenarians. Methods and results We compared the outcomes of 322 consecutive octogenarian patients (mean age 82.6 ± 2.2 years) who underwent mitral repair (n = 227, 70%) or replacement (n = 95, 30%) at Mount Sinai Medical Center and Leipzig Herzzentrum between 1998 and 2008 using propensity score adjustment and univariate and multivariate analyses. Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement were excluded. Coronary bypass was performed in 47.5% (n = 153), and 31.1% (n = 100) required tricuspid repair. Propensity score adjustment yielded comparable groups. Thirty-day mortality in patients undergoing primary elective mitral repair for degenerative disease was 5.1% (2/39). Overall 90-day mortality was 18.9% (43/227) for repair compared with 31.6% (30/95) for replacement (P = 0.014). Pre-discharge echocardiography revealed less than moderate residual regurgitation in 99% of patients (231/232). Adjusted 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival for patients undergoing mitral repair was 71 ± 3, 61 ± 4, and 59 ± 4%, respectively, compared with 56 ± 5, 50 ± 6, and 45 ± 6% for patients undergoing mitral replacement (P = 0.046). Multivariate analysis demonstrated emergency surgery, previous myocardial infarction, concomitant coronary artery bypass surgery, and mitral replacement to be strong independent predictors of early mortality; mitral valve replacement was an independent predictor of reduced survival in degenerative patients. Conclusion Elective mitral repair can be performed with low operative mortality and good long-term outcomes in selected octogenarians with degenerative mitral disease, and is associated with better long-term survival than mitral replacement. The survival benefit associated with surgery for non-degenerative disease is more questionable.
Authors:
Joanna Chikwe; Andrew B Goldstone; Jurgen Passage; Anelechi C Anyanwu; Joerg Seeburger; Javier G Castillo; Farzan Filsoufi; Friedrich W Mohr; David H Adams
Related Documents :
9427133 - Treatment of functional tricuspid regurgitation by bicuspidalization annuloplasty durin...
3374153 - Conservative operation for mitral stenosis. independent determinants of late results.
24085513 - Scrotal antegradesclerotherapy demonstrates anatomical variations on venous drainage in...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2010-09-16
Journal Detail:
Title:  European heart journal     Volume:  32     ISSN:  1522-9645     ISO Abbreviation:  Eur. Heart J.     Publication Date:  2011 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-03-02     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8006263     Medline TA:  Eur Heart J     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  618-26     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1190 Fifth Avenue, Box 1028, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Cheyne-Stokes respiration and obstructive sleep apnoea are independent risk factors for malignant ve...
Next Document:  Genetic variability in response to clopidogrel therapy: clinical implications.