Document Detail


A practical guide to Papanicolaou smear rescreens: how many slides must be reevaluated to make a statistically valid assessment of screening performance?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  9678725     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: The question of the minimum number of Papanicolaou (Pap) smear slides that must be rescreened to draw statistically valid conclusions regarding the accuracy of screening often is raised. No method for generating answers in varying laboratory circumstances has achieved widespread application; standard statistical sample size calculations may represent such a resource. METHODS: A series of tables was constructed to display minimum required numbers of rescreens, with each table representing differing hypothetical laboratory circumstances. To use each table, assumptions must be specified in advance as to prevalence of abnormality, definition of error, baseline false-negative proportions (FNPs) of performance, and a degree of increase in FNPs that is considered a departure from baseline warranting concern, among others. RESULTS: The authors constructed four sample tables displaying minimum numbers of slides that must be rescreened in differing specified laboratory scenarios. Depending on assumed conditions and predetermined levels of satisfactory and unsatisfactory accuracy, the range of numbers is very broad (38-10,000). One example representing likely conditions indicates that 1040 slides must be reexamined; in another scenario, a sample size of 300 is sufficient. CONCLUSIONS: The minimum number of rescreened slides needed to draw statistically valid conclusions regarding Pap smear screening accuracy can be calculated using standard statistical methods. However, a number of assumptions must be detailed in advance. The authors offer this as a practical guide and a continuation of a general inquiry regarding Pap smear error rate measurement and display. The use of these tables raises at least as many questions as it answers, but still may represent a significant advance. Future efforts at further numeric characterization of aspects of Pap smear screening performance are warranted to enable rational decision making when performance is examined in the course of quality assurance, and during quality control and regulatory activities. [See editorial on pages 127-9, this issue.]
Authors:
P A Krieger; T Cohen; S Naryshkin
Related Documents :
16392805 - Homology modeling of the serotonin 5-ht1a receptor using automated docking of bioactive...
16848155 - Surnames as markers of pathologies--two statistical techniques and their applications.
15503635 - Design of highly specific ligands of fibrin for therapeutic applications.
15973565 - The impact of pharmacophore modeling in drug design.
12713165 - The development and validation of a geographic information system database for the poul...
3657195 - From simple to complex oscillatory behaviour: analysis of bursting in a multiply regula...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Cancer     Volume:  84     ISSN:  0008-543X     ISO Abbreviation:  Cancer     Publication Date:  1998 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1998-08-05     Completed Date:  1998-08-05     Revised Date:  2007-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0374236     Medline TA:  Cancer     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  130-7     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Corporate Medical Group, Quest Diagnostics, Inc., Teterboro, New Jersey 07608, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Female
Humans
Mass Screening / standards*,  statistics & numerical data
Observer Variation
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Uterine Cervical Diseases / prevention & control*
Vaginal Smears / standards*,  statistics & numerical data
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Cancer. 1998 Jun 25;84(3):127-9   [PMID:  9678724 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Proliferative reaction of myelogenous leukemia cells with cytokines G-CSF, GM-CSF, M-CSF, SCF and TP...
Next Document:  Percutaneous core cutting needle biopsy compared with fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of per...