|p21 Promotes oncolytic adenoviral activity in ovarian cancer and is a potential biomarker.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 20598155 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|The oncolytic adenovirus dl922-947 replicates selectively within and lyses cells with a dysregulated Rb pathway, a finding seen in > 90% human cancers. dl922-947 is more potent than wild type adenovirus and the E1B-deletion mutant dl1520 (Onyx-015). We wished to determine which host cell factors influence cytotoxicity. SV40 large T-transformed MRC5-VA cells are 3-logs more sensitive to dl922-947 than isogenic parental MRC5 cells, confirming that an abnormal G1/S checkpoint increases viral efficacy. The sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to dl922-947 varied widely: IC50 values ranged from 51 (SKOV3ip1) to 0.03 pfu/cell (TOV21G). Cells sensitive to dl922-947 had higher S phase populations and supported earlier E1A expression. Cytotoxicity correlated poorly with both infectivity and replication, but well with expression of p21 by microarray and western blot analyses. Matched p21+/+ and -/- Hct116 cells confirmed that p21 influences dl922-947 activity in vitro and in vivo. siRNA-mediated p21 knockdown in sensitive TOV21G cells decreases E1A expression and viral cytotoxicity, whilst expression of p21 in resistant A2780CP cells increases virus activity in vitro and in intraperitoneal xenografts. These results highlight that host cell factors beyond simple infectivity can influence the efficacy of oncolytic adenoviruses. p21 expression may be an important biomarker of response in clinical trials.|
|Magdalena B Flak; Claire M Connell; Claude Chelala; Kyra Archibald; Michael A Salako; Katrina J Pirlo; Michelle Lockley; Sally P Wheatley; Frances R Balkwill; Iain A McNeish|
Related Documents :
|6256575 - Infection of feline embryo adherent cells with feline leukemia virus: feline oncornavir...
6396395 - Effects of treatment of trypomastigote forms of trypanosoma cruzi or host cells with et...
7593755 - Apoptosis in chicken embryos induced by the infectious bursal disease virus.
6319975 - Protein synthesis in vsv infected cns, neuroblastoma and bhk cell lines.
22546375 - Silver nanoparticles-mediated g2/m cycle arrest of renal epithelial cells is associated...
23305345 - Overcoming bortezomib resistance in human b cells by anti-cd20/rituximab-mediated compl...
|Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Date: 2010-07-03|
|Title: Molecular cancer Volume: 9 ISSN: 1476-4598 ISO Abbreviation: Mol. Cancer Publication Date: 2010|
|Created Date: 2010-07-16 Completed Date: 2010-12-06 Revised Date: 2013-05-29|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 101147698 Medline TA: Mol Cancer Country: England|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 175 Citation Subset: IM|
|Centre for Molecular Oncology and Imaging, Institute of Cancer, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1 M 6BQ, UK.|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Adenovirus E1A Proteins / metabolism
Cyclin D / metabolism
Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21 / genetics, physiology*
Gene Knockdown Techniques
Ovarian Neoplasms / metabolism, pathology, therapy, virology*
|0/Adenovirus E1A Proteins; 0/CDKN1A protein, human; 0/Cyclin D; 0/Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21|
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Mol Cancer
Publisher: BioMed Central
Copyright ©2010 Flak et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Received Day: 10 Month: 11 Year: 2009
Accepted Day: 3 Month: 7 Year: 2010
collection publication date: Year: 2010
Electronic publication date: Day: 3 Month: 7 Year: 2010
Volume: 9First Page: 175 Last Page: 175
Publisher Id: 1476-4598-9-175
PubMed Id: 20598155
|p21 promotes oncolytic adenoviral activity in ovarian cancer and is a potential biomarker|
|Magdalena B Flak1||Email: email@example.com|
|Claire M Connell13||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Claude Chelala1||Email: email@example.com|
|Kyra Archibald2||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Michael A Salako12||Email: email@example.com|
|Katrina J Pirlo1||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Michelle Lockley1||Email: email@example.com|
|Sally P Wheatley3||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Frances R Balkwill2||Email: email@example.com|
|Iain A McNeish1||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
1Centre for Molecular Oncology and Imaging, Institute of Cancer, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1 M 6BQ, UK
2Cancer and Inflammation, Institute of Cancer, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1 M 6BQ, UK
3Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RQ, UK
Oncolytic viruses multiply selectively within infected cancer cells and cause death, with release of mature viruses that infect neighbouring cells. Upon infection, the first adenoviral protein to be expressed is E1A, which is required for the efficient transcription of other viral early genes . Another function is to drive infected cells into S phase by disrupting the interaction between pRb and E2F , allowing transactivation of genes necessary for viral DNA replication. Two E1A conserved regions are responsible for this disruption: CR2 binds with high affinity to the B-domain of the pRb pocket whilst CR1 displaces E2F from the E1A CR2/pRb complex by low affinity binding with pRb directly at the E2F binding site .
We have shown that the E1A CR2 deleted adenovirus dl922-947 has considerable activity in ovarian cancer and induces cell death through a non-apoptotic mechanism . It is more potent than E1A wild-type adenoviruses and the E1B-55K mutant dl1520 (Onyx-015, H101) [5,6]. dl922-947 replicates selectively in cells with abnormalities of the Rb pathway and consequent G1-S checkpoint, findings seen in over 90% of human cancers . We also showed that dl922-947 activity is associated with deregulation of multiple cell cycle checkpoints and that accelerated cell cycle progression enhances efficacy . In ovarian cancer, multiple G1-S cell cycle abnormalities are observed [9,10]. However, it is unclear which of these are most important for determining sensitivity to dl922-947, nor is there a simple biomarker assay of virus activity. Clinical trials of E1A CR2-deleted adenoviruses are underway (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov reference NCT00805376), so understanding these factors will aid identification of patients most likely to respond.
Our data indicate that infectivity is not the only determinant of cell sensitivity, so we have focussed on post-infection events. There is poor correlation between extent of viral replication and cell death when comparing different cell lines. Basal expression of p21 appears an important factor in identifying cells sensitive to adenovirus cytotoxicity and correlates with expression of E1A, death in vitro of malignant and transformed cells and also with anti-tumour activity in vivo. We also show that p21 is predominantly cytosolic and is targeted for proteasomal destruction after infection. Knockdown of p21 in high-expressing cells reduces E1A expression and adenovirus activity, whilst re-expression in p21low cells increases E1A expression and the cytotoxicity of both dl922-947 and wild-type adenovirus. Finally, we show that p21 stabilises cyclin D expression and thus promotes a cellular environment conducive to adenovirus replication.
We wished to determine which host cell factors contributed to cell sensitivity to the E1A CR2-deleted adenovirus dl922-947. We first examined normal (MRC5) and SV40 Large T-transformed (MRC5-VA) human lung fibroblasts. MRC-VA cells were dramatically more sensitive to dl922-947 (IC50 > 104 pfu/cell (MRC) vs 2.3 pfu/cell (MRC-VA)) (Fig 1A) and supported significantly greater viral replication (Additional File 1). Thus, complete deregulation of Rb pathway induced by SV40 Large T antigen has profound effects upon virus activity.
The cytotoxicity of dl922-947 was then assessed in a panel of eight human ovarian cancer cells (Fig 1B). The panel's sensitivity to dl922-947 varied greatly, with IC50 values ranging from 0.03 pfu/cell (TOV21G) to 51.1 pfu/cell (SKOV3ip1). We chose the two most sensitive (TOV21G and IGROV1) and least sensitive (SKOV3ip1 and A2780CP) lines for further evaluation. Since the adenovirus life cycle relies upon host cell infection, we analysed infectivity in the 4 cell-lines using two assays: GFP fluorescence following infection with non-replicating Ad CMV-GFP (Fig 1B) and qPCR for internalised viral genomes two hours after infection with dl922-947 (Additional File 2). Infectivity could not explain differences in virus efficacy, as there was poor correlation with IC50 and all 4 lines were infectable. E1A, first adenovirus gene to be expressed, is an absolute pre-requisite for productive infection. There was a clear correlation between early expression of E1A in the 4 lines and their sensitivity to viral cytotoxicity (Fig 1C) but no complete correlation between cytotoxicity and infectious virion production (Fig 1C) in this comparison of four cell lines: virion production was initially highest in TOV21G, but was exceeded in SKOV3ip1 cells at 72 hours. Meanwhile, IGROV1 cells generated fewer virions than resistant SKOV3ip1 cells at all time points. Thus, cytotoxicity appears not to be a direct function of intracellular virion number.
We chose to investigate host cell factors governing cell cycle progression and their potential role in determining viral efficacy. Cell cycle analysis of uninfected, asynchronous cells by propidium iodide flow cytometry demonstrated a strong correlation between proportion of cells in S phase and sensitivity to dl922-947 (r2 = 0.91; p = 0.04 - Additional File 3), although S phase fraction did not translate into cell growth rate, with A2780CP being the most rapidly growing line (Additional File 3). We examined gene expression data of the five members of our ovarian cancer cells (IGROV1, OVCAR3, OVCAR4, OVCAR5, SKOV3) that are part of the NCI60 panel. Using Gene Expression Omnibus data (GEO http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/geo/index.cgi), we identified genes most differentially expressed in the most sensitive of the five lines (IGROV1) compared with the others. The two most over-expressed cell cycle genes were CDKN1A (p21Waf1) and CCND2 (Cyclin D2 - Additional File 4). As data from MRC fibroblasts (Fig 1A) and our previous results from immortalized ovarian surface epithelial cells  indicated that Rb pathway status is a strong determinant of cell sensitivity to dl922-947, we examined expression of components of this pathway in the two sensitive and two resistant lines (Fig 1D). We observed no obvious correlation between cell sensitivity and phosphorylation of pRb at three sites (Ser 612, S780 and Ser 807/811). However, we did observe that expression of p21, as well as Cyclin D, p16 and p27, correlated well with cell sensitivity. Therefore, we investigated the role of p21 in adenoviral activity and whether its expression might act as a biomarker for dl922-947 activity.
We first examined matched p21+/+ and p21-/- Hct116 cells. There was no difference in infectivity between the two cell lines (data not shown), but expression of p21 in Hct116 cells is associated with significantly increased sensitivity to dl922-947 and also two E1-wild-type viruses, Ad5 WT and dl309 (Fig 2A) in 120-hour cytotoxicity assays, although there was no difference at 72 hours pi (data not shown). In addition, p21+/+ cells express more E1A (as detected by immunofluorescence - Fig 2B) and generate and release significantly more infectious virions than p21-/- cells (Additional File 5). Following infection with dl922-947, p21 expression declined significantly between 24 and 48 hours post infection (pi) (Fig 2C), which was reversed following treatment with MG132, indicating that p21 is targeted for proteasomal destruction (Fig 2C). Sub-cellular fractionation indicated that p21 was largely cytoplasmic and unlikely, therefore, to function as a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (Fig 2C). To examine how Hct116 p21+/+ cells responded to other forms of genotoxic stress, we exposed them to x-irradiation. Six hours following irradiation, there is a marked increase in p21 expression, compared to the reduction seen with dl922-947 (Fig 2C). Finally, we implanted Hct116 p21+/+ and p21-/- cells in the flank of female nude mice. Once tumours were approximately 100 mm3, dl922-947 or Ad CMV-GFP (1 × 1010 particles in 50 μl PBS) was injected intra-tumourally on three occasions. Both p21+/+ and p21-/- tumours injected with control virus continued to grow. However, following dl922-947 injection, p21+/+ tumours were smaller than p21-/-, which persisted until the end of the experiment and reached statistical significance (Fig 2D).
We next examined the hTERT-immortalised ovarian surface epithelial cell line IOSE25, which has intact Rb and p53 function . We have recently identified two spontaneously transformed IOSE25 sub-lines, TOSE1 and TOSE4, which have acquired the ability to grow in soft agar but do not form tumours within immunocompromised mice and thus are a valuable tool for investigating early ovarian carcinogenesis (Archibald et al 2010 MS in preparation). TOSE1 and 4 are greatly more sensitive to dl922-947 than IOSE25 (Fig 3) and express high levels of p21.
As with the Hct116 p21+/+ cells, we observed a reduction in p21 expression in the two sensitive ovarian cancer cell lines (TOV21G and IGROV1) following infection with dl922-947 (Fig 4A). Using a pool of four siRNA constructs, p21 knockdown was achieved in TOV21G cells for up to 96 hours, which was associated with a significant reduction in DNA replication, as detected by BRDU incorporation (TOV21G + Scr 26.4 ± 0.6% vs TOV21G + p21 siRNA 22.1 ± 0.6%, p = 0.001; Fig 4B). TOV21G cells were infected with dl922-947 24 hours following siRNA-mediated p21 knockdown. The p21 knockdown reduced E1A expression and infectious virion production significantly (Fig 4C). Finally, 24 hours following p21 knockdown, TOV21G cells were infected with dl922-947 and cytotoxicity assessed 96 hours thereafter. At all MOI studied, there was significantly less cell death in the p21 knockdown cells than in those treated with scrambled siRNA (Fig 4D).
We next investigated the effects of re-expressing p21 in a cell line with intrinsically low levels of the protein and low sensitivity to dl922-947. A2780CP cells were transfected with a plasmid encoding p21 under CMV immediate early promoter control. We selected one pool, ACP-p21 1 (Fig 5A), with stable p21 expression. As control, we used A2780CP stably expressing GFP (ACP-GFP), which expressed very low levels of p21, comparable with the parental cell line.
There was a significant increase in S phase population in asynchronous log-growth phase ACP-p21 cells compared to ACP-GFP cells (23.3 ± 0.3% vs 17.7 ± 0.3% respectively, p < 0.001) (Fig 5A). There was also a corresponding and significant increase in BRDU uptake in ACP-p21 cells compared to parental A2780CP cells (Additional File 6). Interestingly, expression of p21 appeared to induce a small, but statistically significant, inhibitory effect on infectivity (Additional File 7). However, despite this, ACP-p21 cells supported greater E1A expression 24 h pi and increased production of infectious dl922-947 virions and were also more sensitive to both dl922-947 and Ad5 WT cytotoxicity (Fig 5B). As with Hct116 p21+/+, TOV21G and IGROV1 cells, p21 expression diminished 24-48 hours pi in ACP-p21 cells, but rose again 72 and 120 h pi (Fig 5C).
We then implanted ACP-p21 and ACP-GFP cells intraperitoneally (i.p.) in female nude mice. These xenografts are extremely aggressive, with untreated animals requiring sacrifice after 18-20 days (data not shown). Mice were inoculated i.p. with dl922-947 on days 8-10 inclusive and sacrificed 48 hours thereafter. p21-expressing xenografts supported greater E1A expression within tumour nodules (Fig 5D). There were also consequent increases in infectious virion titre in serum in ACP-p21 bearing mice compared to ACP-GFP mice, although the differences did not reach statistical significance - ACP-GFP mean titres 24 and 48 hours pi: 1.74 × 105 +/- 1.36 × 105 and 2.56 × 105 +/- 1.95 × 105 pfu/ml (mean +/- s.d. n = 5) respectively. For ACP-p21 cells, the titres at the same time points were 2.52 × 105 +/- 1.42 × 105 and 6.08 × 105 +/- 6.95 × 105 pfu/ml.
Finally, we investigated the mechanism by which p21 expression could be associated with increased adenoviral activity. We first examined endogenous activity of the PI3kinase/AKT pathway in the four ovarian cancer cell lines. Phosphorylation of p21 at Thr145 by AKT reduces the binding of p21 to cdk2 and promotes cell cycle progression . Thus, it remained possible that any p21 expressed in TOV21G and IGROV1 cells was unable to exert cell cycle inhibitory effects. Levels of activated AKT (Ser 473 phospho-AKT) in uninfected cells were highest in TOV21G cells, but were largely similar in the other three lines (Additional File 8), whilst knockdown of p21 in TOV21G cells had no effect on upstream PI3kinase activation (data not shown). However, we did observe that basal cdk2 kinase activity was greatest in p21-expressing TOV21G and IGROV1 cells, as determined by phosphorylation of Histone H1 in asynchronous cells (Additional File 9), in keeping with the greater rates of S phase seen as detected by flow cytometry. In addition, there was a reduction in cyclin D expression in uninfected Hct116 p21+/+ and TOV21G cells following p21 knockdown (Fig 6A), suggesting that cyclin D stability is at least partially p21-dependent in these cells. Conversely, we also observed an increase in cyclin D expression in ACP-p21 cells compared to ACP-GFP (Fig 6B), and, when cyclin D was knocked down in TOV21G cells by pools of siRNA directed against all three isoforms, there was a parallel reduction in p21 expression and a significant reduction in dl922-947 cytotoxicity (Fig 6C). Thus, p21 and cyclin D appear to be stabilise each other and co-operate to promote virus activity.
A key step in development of novel cancer therapies is the identification of biomarkers that can predict which patients might respond to treatment. Our results suggest that expression of p21 may be a predictive biomarker for the oncolytic adenovirus dl922-947. Many investigators have focused on expression of CAR (Coxsackie Adenovirus Receptor), the primary receptor for Group C adenovirus, as the most important determinant of adenovirus function . Undoubtedly, the ability of virus to infect the host cell is vital for subsequent activity. However, the largest study of primary ovarian cancers reveals that the majority retain expression of CAR , whilst primary ascitic cells can show demonstrable CAR and αvβ3/5 integrin expression . We show that infectivity alone is a poor predictor of cell sensitivity to virus-induced death. It is also clear that the process of adenovirus infection involves receptors and co-receptors other than classical CAR and αvβ3/5 integrins, [16,17].
The first adenoviral gene to be expressed is E1A, which relies upon host cell transcription factors, including EF-1A, E2F and Sp1 [18,19]. As E1A expression correlates directly with overall virus efficacy, the ability of the host cell to permit expression will profoundly influence all subsequent parts of the lifecycle. We show that p21 expression in uninfected cancer cells is associated with such a permissive state in cancer cells. One function of E1A is to induce infected cells into S phase, the phase most conducive to viral DNA replication. The two cells lines that were most sensitive to viral efficacy expressed p21 prior to infection and had the highest rate of S phase in uninfected asynchronous populations, although this did not correlate with rate of growth in vitro or in vivo or the state of pRb phosphorylation. pRb is phosphorylated on multiple sites by cyclin/cdk complexes , with individual complexes preferentially phosphorylating different residues to alter function [21-23]. Hyperphosphorylation of pRb late in G1 heralds transcription of genes necessary for host cell (and viral) DNA replication. However, there is now evidence that pRb can be phosphorylated by kinases other than cdks  and that p21 itself can bind to pRb and alter phosphorylation , rendering patterns of pRb phosphorylation in asynchronous cells a poor predictor of virus activity. In addition, p21 binds to the same A/B pocket in pRb as E2F and may thus displace E2F independently of pRb phosphorylation .
p21 has a multiple roles within cells. Whilst it is a cdk inhibitor (CKI) and a single molecule can completely inhibit cyclin A/cdk1 activity , it functions as far more than a pure CKI; firstly, members of the p21 family act as assembly factors, promoting the formation of active cyclin D/cdk4 complexes at low concentrations, also stabilising cyclin D [27,28]. Our results show that p21 knockdown causes loss of cyclin D expression in uninfected TOV21G and Hct116 cells, whilst its re-expression in ACP-p21 cells increases cyclin D levels. Conversely, knockdown of cyclin D causes a reduction in p21 levels, confirming the interdependency of the two in the absence of genotoxic stress. Secondly, binding of p21 to cyclin D/cdk4 complexes titrates p21 away from cyclin E/cdk2, thus promoting S phase entry . Our data show that p21 is predominantly cytoplasmic, and thus is titrated away from cyclin E/cdk2 to facilitate viral activity. In addition, the two sensitive ovarian cell lines demonstrated greater phosphorylation of histone H1 in basal conditions. This histone is phosphorylated by cdk2 at G1/S transition  and is thus a marker of cdk2 kinase activity. Previous studies have indicated that Akt-mediated p21 phosphorylation can result in p21 localizing to the cytoplasm in Her2-positive cancer cells  and also inhibit p21 binding to cdk2 . Our results indicate that the most sensitive line, TOV21G, had higher levels of basal AKT (S473) phosphorylation than the other lines, but there was no overall correlation between cell sensitivity and PI3kinase/AKT activity. Finally, p21, when phosphorylated at Thr57 by cdk2, has a role in promoting association between cdc2 (cdk1) and cyclin B and hence facilitates G2/M progression . We have previously shown that dl922-947 is capable of over-riding multiple cell cycle checkpoints in sensitive cells. This ability is augmented by nuclear expression of survivin, which acts to augment cyclin D activity .
In response to genotoxic stress, p21 translocates to the nucleus where it causes cell cycle arrest and promotes nucleotide excision repair following association with PCNA . We show that p21 expression falls following adenovirus infection, with evidence of proteasomal degradation. Expression of E1A alone increases p21 expression through direct transactivation of the p21 promoter . However, any increase in p21 significantly above basal levels would promote its ability to arrest the cell cycle, to the detriment of adenoviral function. Thus, p21 levels fall post-infection. The adenovirus proteins E1B-55K and E4orf6 form the core of an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex that targets cellular proteins, including p53, Mre11 and DNA ligase IV, for proteasomal destruction : p21 may also be a target for this complex. Interestingly, expression of p21 fell only transiently in the ACP-p21 cells, where expression is under the control of a constitutive promoter, suggesting that some p21 loss in Hct116 and TOV21G cells may result from reduced transcription following the destruction of p53 by E1B55K/E4orf6.
Two recent publications have suggested that p21 expression might reduce oncolytic adenovirus activity in cancer cells, including Hct116. Like us, Höti et al  found that there was greater expression of E1A in Hct116 p21+/+ cells than in p21-/-. However, they found that treatment of cells with valproic acid, a pan-HDAC inhibitor, reduced oncolytic adenovirus activity and was associated with an increase in p21 expression. Recent evidence suggests that the number of genes responsive to valproic acid is at least 100 and may exceed 1000 [37,38], whilst the pathways inhibited by valproic acid in myeloma cells include not only cell cycle progression, but also DNA replication and gene transcription , all of which are required for adenovirus function. In addition, valproic acid will inhibit HDAC3, which has a critical role in S phase progression . Together, these findings suggest strongly that the effects of valproic acid are not mediated purely by p21. Finally, Höti et al indicated that co-infection of Hct116 p21-/- cells with an oncolytic virus and a non-replicating virus expressing p21 reduced oncolytic virus replication compared to co-infection with a control virus. However, such treatment will force an increase in p21 expression after infection (and thus block cell cycle progression), which is the opposite of the natural expression pattern - like us, Höti et al and others  have shown that p21 expression falls after infection; we wish to show in our experiments that it is expression of p21 prior to infection that is relevant. In the second manuscript , Hct116 p21+/+ and p21-/- cells were infected with a variety of oncolytic adenoviruses, including another E1A CR2-deleted virus Δ24. Results suggested that there was greater anti-tumour efficacy in p21-/- cells or in cells in which p21 was knocked down via siRNA. However, dose response experiments were performed only at a single early time point (72 hours) after infection and the lowest MOI employed is 1 pfu/cell: in our experiments, the difference in efficacy of both dl922-947 and the wild-type viruses became evident 120-144 hours post-infection and the IC50 values of 0.01-0.1 were seen; thus Shiina et al will have missed significant differences at lower doses and/or later time points. Also, following siRNA-mediated p21 knockdown, cells were re-seeded prior to infection with adenoviruses, which could significantly alter expression of a cell cycle-related gene even after RNAi; survival is then assessed after exposure to only a single dose of virus, rather than a formal dose response range. There is no assessment of virus protein expression, change in p21 expression following infection or in vivo assessment of the role of p21, nor any demonstration of the effect of p21 re-expression in cells with low endogenous expression. Finally, Δ24 was generated using the adenovirus plasmid pBHG10 , which lacks the entire E3 region, including E3-11.6 Adenovirus Death Protein (ADP), whilst dl922-947 has intact ADP. Although the mechanism by which ADP promotes cell death late after infection is unclear, we and others have shown that deletions or mutations within ADP certainly alter the kinetics of adenovirus-induced death [4,44] and also impair virus spread . Thus we believe that our thorough examination both in vitro and in vivo does support a role for basal p21 expression in cancer cells prior to infection in promoting an environment conducive to viral replication.
There are conflicting data on p21 in ovarian cancer. In the serous sub-type, p21 expression is frequently lost  and this appears to be a poor prognostic factor . However, in clear cell carcinoma, which has low response rates to chemotherapy and poor overall prognosis , p21 expression is frequently seen [46,49]. It is noteworthy that TOV21G, our most sensitive line and which expresses high levels of p21, was derived from a clear cell tumour . In addition, low malignant potential (borderline) ovarian tumours are characterized by p21 expression , and our results with TOSE cells, which are transformed but cannot form tumours in nude mice, are consistent with this finding.
Although there are likely to be many potential biomarkers of adenoviral activity, these results indicate that basal expression of p21 in ovarian cancer prior to infection is associated with an environment conducive to oncolytic adenoviral activity and might have use as a biomarker in future clinical trials.
All cancer cells were maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2, in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum (FCS), penicillin/streptomycin and fungizome. Details of cell line origin and authentication are found in Additional File 10. IOSE25, TOSE1 and TOSE4 cells were maintained in NOSE-CM medium, as previously described . A2780CP-p21 (ACP-p21) cells were generated following transfection of A2780CP cells with pCEP-WAF1 (AdGene, Cambridge, MA) using FuGene6 (Roche) followed by selection in 200 μg/ml hygromycin. For viability assays, 2 × 104 cells were infected in serum-free medium at multiplicities of infection (MOI) 0.001-1000 plaque-forming units (pfu)/cell. After 2 hours, cells were re-fed with medium containing 5% FCS. Cell viability was assayed by MTT assay using a Victor3 plate reader (Perkin Elmer, Beaconsfield, UK). All viability assays were done in triplicate and experiments repeated at least twice. For siRNA experiments, cells were transfected with ON-TARGETplus SMARTpool siRNAs or scrambled siRNA control (Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO) using DharmaFECT1. 24 hours after addition of RNAi, knockdown was confirmed by immunoblotting. Virus infection took place 24 hours after knockdown. For cyclin D siRNA, cells were transfected with equal quantities of ON-TARGETplus SMARTpool siRNAs directed against CCND1, 2 and 3. Cells were exposed to 5 Gy X-irradiation using an Hs-X-Ray System (A.G.O. Installations Ltd., Reading, UK).
Cells were washed in PBS and re-suspended in ice-cold buffer I (0.3 M sucrose, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EGTA, 15 mM Tris.HCl pH7.5, 0.5 mM DTT, plus protease inhibitors). An equal volume of buffer II (buffer I plus 4% IGEPAL) was added and the mixture incubated on ice for 10 mins before layering onto sucrose (buffer I containing 1.2 M sucrose). Samples were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C. Supernatant (cytoplasmic fraction) was harvested, and nuclei lysed in RIPA buffer (20 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 137 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1% nonidet-P40, 0.1% SDS, 1% deoxycholate, plus protease inhibitors, Benzonase and 2 mM MgCl2).
Protein lysates were electrophoresed on SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes by semi-dry blotting. Antibody binding was visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). Antibodies used were anti-E1A (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-p21, anti-p27, anti-cyclin E, anti-cyclin D, anti-cdk4 (all BD Biosciences), anti-phosphorylated pRb (Ser807/811 New England Biolabs; Ser780 and Ser612 Abcam), anti-adenovirus (Abcam), anti-Ku-70 and anti-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). For immunofluorescence, Hct116 cells were grown on poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips, infected with dl922-947 (MOI 0.5) and fixed with 5% formaldehyde. Cells were permeabilised with 0.15% Triton X-100 and primary antibody binding visualized with Texas red or Fluorescein-conjugated secondary antibodies (Vector Laboratories). Coverslips were mounted in 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-containing Vectashield and viewed using a Zeiss Axioplan2 fluorescence microscope with a 10× objective lens and digital camera (Hamamatsu, Orca-ER). Data were processed using Simple PCI software.
For infectivity assays, cells were infected with Ad CMV-GFP (MOI 5 and 50), typsinised 24 h pi, washed twice in ice cold PBS and re-suspended in 500 μl PBS. For cell cycle analyses, cells were infected with dl922-947, trypsinised, washed twice in ice cold PBS and fixed in 70% ethanol. Cells were then washed with PBS and re-suspended in 200 μl typsinised propidium iodide and 100 μg/ml RNase A (MP Biomedicals, UK). For BRDU analysis, cells were incubated with 10 μM BRDU for 1 hour, harvested, washed and fixed in ice cold 70% ethanol. After incubation with primary anti-BRDU mAb (Becton Dickinson) and FITC-conjugated anti-mouse secondary for 20 minutes each at 37°C in the dark, cells were counterstained with PI. Cells were analyzed using a flow cytometer (BD FACSCalibur™, BD Biosciences) with FlowJo software 8.8.4 (Tree Star, Ashland, OR) or a Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorter (FACSCanto, BD Biosciences) with FACS Diva software.
5 × 106 Hct116 cells were inoculated subcutaneously onto the flank of female CD1 nu/nu mice on day 1. Once tumours reached approximately 100 mm3, dl922-947 was injected intra-tumorally (1 × 1010 particles daily on days 1, 4 and 7). Tumour size was measured weekly using callipers and tumour volumes calculated as follows: Volume = (l2 × w)/6 × Π, where l = longest length of the tumour and w = perpendicular width. For A2780CP xenografts, 5 × 106 cells were inoculated intraperitoneally (ip) into female Balb C nu/nu mice. On day 8, dl922-947 was injected ip (5 × 109 particles daily for 3 days in 400 μl 20% icodextrin). 100 μl blood was taken 24 hours following the last virus injection and mice were killed 24 hours thereafter. Tumour and livers were harvested and fixed in 10% formaldehyde. 4 μm sections were cut and processed. E1A expression was detected using a rabbit anti Ad2 E1A Ab (Santa-Cruz).
Real-time PCR was performed on an ABI Prism 7700 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Oligonucleotides and probes designed for the E1A region were as follows: Sense primer: 5'-CCACCTACCCTTCACGAACTG; Anti-sense primer: Anti-sense Primer: 5'-GCCTCCTCGTTGGGATCTTC; Probe ATGATTTAGACGTGACGGCC. PCR conditions were: 50°C for 2 minutes, 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 60 seconds. A standard curve using 103-109 viral DNA genomes was used for quantification. For TCID50 assays, 105 cells were infected at MOI 10 pfu/cell. Cells were harvested into 0.5 ml 0.1 M Tris pH 8.0 and subjected to three rounds of freeze/thawing (liquid N2/37°C), after which they were centrifuged. The supernatant was titred on JH293 cells by serial dilution. To assay viral release from infected cells, culture medium was removed from cells every 24 hours and titred separated on JH293 cells.
NCI60 ovarian cancer data (GEO accession numbers: GSM35955 (IGROV1), GSM35956 (OVCAR3), GSM35957 (OVCAR4), GSM35958 (OVCAR5), GSM35960 (SKOV3)) were analyzed using Bioconductor http://www.bioconductor.org/ packages within the open source R statistical environment http://www.r-project.org. After intra-array loess normalization, Limma  was used for differential expression analysis. Genes differentially regulated in the most sensitive line (GSM35955 IGROV1) versus the others were identified.
All graphs and statistical analyses were generated using Prism4 for Mac (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA). Unless otherwise stated, all results are presented as mean+/-sd, n = 3 and all statistical analyses are unpaired, two-tailed Student's t test, where p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant. Immunoblot images were scanned and band density of defined regions of interest in inverted jpg images was measured using ImageJ software.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
MBF performed the bulk of the experiments; CMC performed experiments for figure 2 in the lab of SPW; CC performed the expression analysis from GEO database; KA generated the IOSE and TOSE cell lines in the lab of FRB; KJP performed experiments shown in figure 6 and Additional Files 6, 7, 8 and 9; MAS and ML contributed results to figure 1B; IAM conceived the project, obtained funding, performed the in vivo experiments and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Supplementary figure 1. Q-PCR and TCID50 assays in MRC5 and MRC5-VA cells infected with dl922-947.
Click here for additional data file (1476-4598-9-175-S1.PDF)
Additional file 2
Supplementary figure 2. Infectivity of 4 ovarian cancer cells lines as assessed by TCID50 2 hours following infection with dl922-947.
Additional file 3
Supplementary figure 3. Correlation between S phase fraction in log-growth phase ovarian cells and sensitivity to dl922-947. Also, ovarian cancer cell growth rate in vitro over 72 hours.
Additional file 4
Supplementary table 1. List of top 100 differentially expressed genes in IGROV1 cells compared to other ovarian cancer cells in NCI60 panel (OVCAR3, OVCAR4, OVCAR5, SKOV3) ranked by B value.
Click here for additional data file (1476-4598-9-175-S4.PDF)
Additional file 5
Supplementary figure 4. Replication of dl922-947 in HCT116 p21+/+ and p21-/- cells.
Click here for additional data file (1476-4598-9-175-S5.PDF)
Additional file 6
Supplementary figure 5. BRCU incorporation in A2780CP and A2780P-p21 cells.
Click here for additional data file (1476-4598-9-175-S6.PDF)
Additional file 7
Supplementary figure 6. Infectivity of A2780CP and A2780CP-p21 cells.
Click here for additional data file (1476-4598-9-175-S7.PDF)
Additional file 8
Supplementary figure 7. Basal AKT phosphorylation in four ovarian cancer cell lines.
Click here for additional data file (1476-4598-9-175-S8.PDF)
Additional file 9
Supplementary figure 8. Basal Histone H1 phosphorylation in four ovarian cancer cell lines
Additional file 10
Supplementary materials and methods. Method for acid histone extraction as well as techniques used for cell line verification.
Click here for additional data file (1476-4598-9-175-S10.DOC)
This work was funded by Barts and the London Charity and by the Medical Research Council. We would like to thank Mohammed Ikram for assistance with histopathology.
|Jones N,Shenk T,An adenovirus type 5 early gene function regulates expression of other early viral genesProc Natl Acad Sci USAYear: 1979763665366910.1073/pnas.76.8.3665291030|
|Fattaey AR,Harlow E,Helin K,Independent regions of adenovirus E1A are required for binding to and dissociation of E2F-protein complexesMol Cell BiolYear: 199313726772778246949|
|Ikeda MA,Nevins JR,Identification of distinct roles for separate E1A domains in disruption of E2F complexesMol Cell BiolYear: 199313702970358413292|
|Baird SK,Aerts JL,Eddaoudi A,Lockley M,Lemoine NR,McNeish IA,Oncolytic adenoviral mutants induce a novel mode of programmed cell death in ovarian cancerOncogeneYear: 2008273081309010.1038/sj.onc.121097718071311|
|Heise C,Hermiston T,Johnson L,Brooks G,Sampson-Johannes A,Williams A,Hawkins L,Kirn D,An adenovirus E1A mutant that demonstrates potent and selective systemic anti-tumoral efficacyNature MedYear: 200061134113910.1038/8047411017145|
|Lockley M,Fernandez M,Wang Y,Li NF,Conroy SE,Lemoine NR,McNeish IA,Activity of the adenoviral E1A deletion mutant dl922-947 in ovarian cancer: comparison with adenovirus wild-type, bioluminescence monitoring and intraperitoneal delivery in icodextrinCancer ResYear: 20066698999810.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-269116424034|
|Sherr CJ,McCormick F,The RB and p53 pathways in cancerCancer CellYear: 2002210311210.1016/S1535-6108(02)00102-212204530|
|Connell CM,Wheatley SP,McNeish IA,Nuclear survivin abrogates multiple cell cycle checkpoints and enhances viral oncolysisCancer ResYear: 2008697923793110.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0817|
|D'Andrilli G,Kumar C,Scambia G,Giordano A,Cell cycle genes in ovarian cancer: steps toward earlier diagnosis and novel therapiesClin Cancer ResYear: 2004108132814110.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-088615623586|
|Yaginuma Y,Hayashi H,Kawai K,Kurakane T,Saitoh Y,Kitamura S,Sengoku K,Ishikawa M,Analysis of the Rb gene and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibitor genes (p16INK4 and p15INK4B) in human ovarian carcinoma cell linesExp Cell ResYear: 199723323323910.1006/excr.1997.35609194486|
|Li NF,Broad S,Lu YJ,Yang JS,Watson R,Hagemann T,Wilbanks G,Jacobs I,Balkwill F,Dafou D,Gayther SA,Human ovarian surface epithelial cells immortalized with hTERT maintain functional pRb and p53 expressionCell ProlifYear: 20074078079410.1111/j.1365-2184.2007.00462.x17877616|
|Rossig L,Jadidi AS,Urbich C,Badorff C,Zeiher AM,Dimmeler S,Akt-dependent phosphorylation of p21(Cip1) regulates PCNA binding and proliferation of endothelial cellsMol Cell BiolYear: 2001215644565710.1128/MCB.21.16.5644-5657.200111463845|
|Kim M,Zinn KR,Barnett BG,Sumerel LA,Krasnykh V,Curiel DT,Douglas JT,The therapeutic efficacy of adenoviral vectors for cancer gene therapy is limited by a low level of primary adenovirus receptors on tumour cellsEur J CancerYear: 2002381917192610.1016/S0959-8049(02)00131-412204675|
|Zeimet AG,Muller-Holzner E,Schuler A,Hartung G,Berger J,Hermann M,Widschwendter M,Bergelson JM,Marth C,Determination of molecules regulating gene delivery using adenoviral vectors in ovarian carcinomasGene TherYear: 200291093110010.1038/sj.gt.330177512140737|
|Kelly FJ,Miller CR,Buchsbaum DJ,Gomez-Navarro J,Barnes MN,Alvarez RD,Curiel DT,Selectivity of TAG-72-targeted adenovirus gene transfer to primary ovarian carcinoma cells versus autologous mesothelial cells in VitroClin Cancer ResYear: 200064323433311106250|
|Dechecchi MC,Melotti P,Bonizzato A,Santacatterina M,Chilosi M,Cabrini G,Heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans are receptors sufficient to mediate the initial binding of adenovirus types 2 and 5J VirolYear: 2001758772878010.1128/JVI.75.18.8772-8780.200111507222|
|Hong SS,Karayan L,Tournier J,Curiel DT,Boulanger PA,Adenovirus type 5 fiber knob binds to MHC class I alpha2 domain at the surface of human epithelial and B lymphoblastoid cellsEmbo JYear: 1997162294230610.1093/emboj/16.9.22949171344|
|Herbst RS,Pelletier M,Boczko EM,Babiss LE,The state of cellular differentiation determines the activity of the adenovirus E1A enhancer element: evidence for negative regulation of enhancer functionJ VirolYear: 1990641611722136708|
|Bruder JT,Hearing P,Cooperative binding of EF-1A to the E1A enhancer region mediates synergistic effects on E1A transcription during adenovirus infectionJ VirolYear: 199165508450871651424|
|Zarkowska T,Mittnacht S,Differential phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein by G1/S cyclin-dependent kinasesJ Biol ChemYear: 1997272127381274610.1074/jbc.272.19.127389139732|
|Kitagawa M,Higashi H,Jung HK,Suzuki-Takahashi I,Ikeda M,Tamai K,Kato J,Segawa K,Yoshida E,Nishimura S,Taya Y,The consensus motif for phosphorylation by cyclin D1-Cdk4 is different from that for phosphorylation by cyclin A/E-Cdk2Embo JYear: 199615706070699003781|
|Knudsen ES,Wang JY,Differential regulation of retinoblastoma protein function by specific Cdk phosphorylation sitesJ Biol ChemYear: 19962718313832010.1074/jbc.271.33.196378626527|
|Lundberg AS,Weinberg RA,Functional inactivation of the retinoblastoma protein requires sequential modification by at least two distinct cyclin-cdk complexesMol Cell BiolYear: 1998187537619447971|
|Inoue Y,Kitagawa M,Taya Y,Phosphorylation of pRB at Ser612 by Chk1/2 leads to a complex between pRB and E2F-1 after DNA damageEmbo JYear: 2007262083209310.1038/sj.emboj.760165217380128|
|Nakanishi M,Kaneko Y,Matsushime H,Ikeda K,Direct interaction of p21 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor with the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor proteinBiochem Biophys Res CommunYear: 1999263354010.1006/bbrc.1999.129610486249|
|Hengst L,Gopfert U,Lashuel HA,Reed SI,Complete inhibition of Cdk/cyclin by one molecule of p21(Cip1)Genes DevYear: 1998123882388810.1101/gad.12.24.38829869641|
|LaBaer J,Garrett MD,Stevenson LF,Slingerland JM,Sandhu C,Chou HS,Fattaey A,Harlow E,New functional activities for the p21 family of CDK inhibitorsGenes DevYear: 19971184786210.1101/gad.11.7.8479106657|
|Cheng M,Olivier P,Diehl JA,Fero M,Roussel MF,Roberts JM,Sherr CJ,The p21(Cip1) and p27(Kip1) CDK 'inhibitors' are essential activators of cyclin D-dependent kinases in murine fibroblastsEmbo JYear: 1999181571158310.1093/emboj/18.6.157110075928|
|Sherr CJ,Roberts JM,CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progressionGenes DevYear: 1999131501151210.1101/gad.13.12.150110385618|
|Hale TK,Contreras A,Morrison AJ,Herrera RE,Phosphorylation of the linker histone H1 by CDK regulates its binding to HP1alphaMol CellYear: 20062269369910.1016/j.molcel.2006.04.01616762841|
|Zhou BP,Liao Y,Xia W,Spohn B,Lee MH,Hung MC,Cytoplasmic localization of p21Cip1/WAF1 by Akt-induced phosphorylation in HER-2/neu-overexpressing cellsNature Cell BiolYear: 2001324525210.1038/3506003211231573|
|Dash BC,El-Deiry WS,Phosphorylation of p21 in G2/M promotes cyclin B-Cdc2 kinase activityMol Cell BiolYear: 2005253364338710.1128/MCB.25.8.3364-3387.200515798220|
|Li R,Waga S,Hannon GJ,Beach D,Stillman B,Differential effects by the p21 CDK inhibitor on PCNA-dependent DNA replication and repairNatureYear: 199437153453710.1038/371534a07935768|
|Najafi SM,Li Z,Makino K,Shao R,Hung MC,The adenoviral E1A induces p21WAF1/CIP1 expression in cancer cellsBiochem Biophys Res CommunYear: 20033051099110410.1016/S0006-291X(03)00905-712767945|
|Querido E,Morrison MR,Chu-Pham-Dang H,Thirlwell SW,Boivin D,Branton PE,Identification of three functions of the adenovirus e4orf6 protein that mediate p53 degradation by the E4orf6-E1B55K complexJ VirolYear: 20017569970910.1128/JVI.75.2.699-709.200111134283|
|Hoti N,Chowdhury W,Hsieh JT,Sachs MD,Lupold SE,Rodriguez R,Valproic acid, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, is an antagonist for oncolytic adenoviral gene therapyMol TherYear: 20061476877810.1016/j.ymthe.2006.07.00916990052|
|Bosetti F,Bell JM,Manickam P,Microarray analysis of rat brain gene expression after chronic administration of sodium valproateBrain Res BullYear: 20056533133810.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.01.00415811599|
|Lee MH,Hong I,Kim M,Lee BH,Kim JH,Kang KS,Kim HL,Yoon BI,Chung H,Kong G,Lee MO,Gene expression profiles of murine fatty liver induced by the administration of valproic acidToxicol Appl PharmacolYear: 2007220455910.1016/j.taap.2006.12.01617292431|
|Neri P,Tagliaferri P,Di Martino MT,Calimeri T,Amodio N,Bulotta A,Ventura M,Eramo PO,Viscomi C,Arbitrio M,Rossi M,Caraglia M,Munshi NC,Anderson KC,Tassone P,In vivo anti-myeloma activity and modulation of gene expression profile induced by valproic acid, a histone deacetylase inhibitorBr J HaematolYear: 200814352053118986388|
|Bhaskara S,Chyla BJ,Amann JM,Knutson SK,Cortez D,Sun ZW,Hiebert SW,Deletion of histone deacetylase 3 reveals critical roles in S phase progression and DNA damage controlMol CellYear: 200830617210.1016/j.molcel.2008.02.03018406327|
|Keblusek P,Dorsman JC,Teunisse AF,Teunissen H,van der Eb AJ,Zantema A,The adenoviral E1A oncoproteins interfere with the growth-inhibiting effect of the cdk-inhibitor p21(CIP1/WAF1)J Gen VirolYear: 19998038139010073698|
|Shiina M,Lacher MD,Christian C,Korn WM,RNA interference-mediated knockdown of p21(WAF1) enhances anti-tumor cell activity of oncolytic adenovirusesCancer Gene TherYear: 200916810910.1038/cgt.2009.2919407849|
|Fueyo J,Gomez-Manzano C,Alemany R,Lee P,McDonnell T,Mitlianga P,Shi Y-X,VA L,Yung W,Kyritsis A,A mutant oncolytic adenovirus targeting the Rb pathway produces anti-glioma effect in vivoOncogeneYear: 20001921210.1038/sj.onc.120325110644974|
|Tollefson AE,Scaria A,Ying B,Wold WS,Mutations within the ADP (E3-11.6K) protein alter processing and localization of ADP and the kinetics of cell lysis of adenovirus-infected cellsJ VirolYear: 2003777764777810.1128/JVI.77.14.7764-7778.200312829816|
|Tollefson AE,Ryerse JS,Scaria A,Hermiston TW,Wold WS,The E3-11.6-kDa adenovirus death protein (ADP) is required for efficient cell death: characterization of cells infected with adp mutantsVirologyYear: 199622015216210.1006/viro.1996.02958659107|
|Köbel M,Kalloger SE,Boyd N,McKinney S,Mehl E,Palmer C,Leung S,Bowen NJ,Ionescu DN,Rajput A,Prentice LM,Miller D,Santos J,Swenerton K,Gilks CB,Huntsman D,Ovarian Carcinoma Subtypes Are Different Diseases: Implications for Biomarker StudiesPLoS MedYear: 20085e23210.1371/journal.pmed.005023219053170|
|Bali A,O'Brien PM,Edwards LS,Sutherland RL,Hacker NF,Henshall SM,Cyclin D1, p53, and p21Waf1/Cip1 expression is predictive of poor clinical outcome in serous epithelial ovarian cancerClin Cancer ResYear: 2004105168517710.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-075115297421|
|Sugiyama T,Kamura T,Kigawa J,Terakawa N,Kikuchi Y,Kita T,Suzuki M,Sato I,Taguchi K,Clinical characteristics of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a distinct histologic type with poor prognosis and resistance to platinum-based chemotherapyCancerYear: 2000882584258910.1002/1097-0142(20000601)88:11<2584::AID-CNCR22>3.0.CO;2-510861437|
|Shimizu M,Nikaido T,Toki T,Shiozawa T,Fujii S,Clear cell carcinoma has an expression pattern of cell cycle regulatory molecules that is unique among ovarian adenocarcinomasCancerYear: 19998566967710.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990201)85:3<669::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO;2-F10091740|
|Provencher DM,Lounis H,Champoux L,Tetrault M,Manderson EN,Wang JC,Eydoux P,Savoie R,Tonin PN,Mes-Masson AM,Characterization of four novel epithelial ovarian cancer cell linesIn Vitro Cell Dev Biol AnimYear: 20003635736110.1290/1071-2690(2000)036<0357:COFNEO>2.0.CO;210949993|
|Palazzo JP,Monzon F,Burke M,Hyslop T,Dunton C,Barusevicius A,Capuzzi D,Kovatich AJ,Overexpression of p21WAF1/CIP1 and MDM2 characterizes serous borderline ovarian tumorsHum PatholYear: 20003169870410.1053/hupa.2000.764110872663|
|Li NF,Wilbanks G,Balkwill F,Jacobs IJ,Dafou D,Gayther SA,A modified medium that significantly improves the growth of human normal ovarian surface epithelial (OSE) cells in vitroLab InvestYear: 20048492393110.1038/labinvest.370009315077121|
|Wettenhall JM,Smyth GK,limmaGUI: a graphical user interface for linear modeling of microarray dataBioinformaticsYear: 2004203705370610.1093/bioinformatics/bth44915297296|
Previous Document: Self-rated health of population in Southern China: association with socio-demographic characteristic...
Next Document: An insertion mutation in ABCB4 is associated with gallbladder mucocele formation in dogs.