| An opinion and practice survey on the structure and management of data and safety monitoring boards. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 21287412 Owner: NLM Status: In-Data-Review |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
There is little to no empirical data available on how data and safety monitoring boards (DSMBs) are structured and how they operate. The purpose of this study was to provide data on this. To accomplish this goal, we administered a random survey on current structure and management practices and opinions as reported by principal investigators (PIs) and biostatisticians. We also surveyed Institutional Review Board (IRB) community members, as proxies for the public, as to their opinions on how DSMBs should be structured and managed. A final purpose was to compare opinions about what should be taking place to what is actually happening. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Patti M Tereskerz; Thomas M Guterbock; Deborah A Kermer; Jonathan D Moreno |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Accountability in research Volume: 18 ISSN: 1545-5815 ISO Abbreviation: Account Res Publication Date: 2011 Jan |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2011-02-02 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 9100813 Medline TA: Account Res Country: United States |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 1-30 Citation Subset: E; IM |
Affiliation:
|
Program in Ethics and Policy, Center for Biomedical Ethics and Humanities, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Chronic Istaroxime Improves Cardiac Function and Heart Rate Variability in Cardiomyopathic Hamsters.
Next Document: Bad News about Bad News: The Disclosure of Risks to Insurability in Research Consent Processes.