Document Detail

A new preference-based analysis for randomized trials can estimate treatment acceptability and effect in compliant patients.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16765271     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Development of a new method of analysis to evaluate the acceptability of (or preferences for) the treatments in a randomized trial, and the benefit of treatment among compliers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We characterize trial participants through the groups who would: accept either treatment if offered (compliers); refuse one treatment but accept the other if it is offered to them (two groups of preferers); or prefer one treatment and insist on it if it is not offered to them initially (two groups of insisters). RESULTS: We show that in our framework, one can always estimate the proportions of patients in these five preference groups. However, constraints are required to estimate the corresponding outcome rates, and thus estimate the treatment effect in the compliers. We propose two possible sets of constraints and illustrate them by numerical examples. CONCLUSIONS: The traditional intention-to-treat analysis avoids biases associated with the alternative per-protocol or as-treated approaches, but it provides imperfect information about the expected treatment effect among patients who are committed to taking the treatment. Many physicians and patients want to know the expected benefit if they adhere to the therapy. Our preference-based analysis provides an estimate of treatment benefit among such patients.
S D Walter; Gordon Guyatt; Victor M Montori; R Cook; K Prasad
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2006-03-27
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of clinical epidemiology     Volume:  59     ISSN:  0895-4356     ISO Abbreviation:  J Clin Epidemiol     Publication Date:  2006 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2006-06-12     Completed Date:  2006-07-28     Revised Date:  2007-11-19    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8801383     Medline TA:  J Clin Epidemiol     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  685-96     Citation Subset:  IM    
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, HSC-2C16, 1200 Main St West, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Carotid Stenosis / therapy
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Informed Consent
Patient Compliance*
Patient Satisfaction*
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic*
Treatment Outcome
Treatment Refusal
Erratum In:
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Nov;60(11):1203

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved.
Next Document:  Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews.