Document Detail

A new method for flow rate measurement in millimeter-scale pipes.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23353139     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Combining the Capacitively Coupled Contactless Conductivity Detection (C4D) technique and the principle of cross correlation flow measurement, a new method for flow rate measurement in millimeter-scale pipes was proposed. The research work included two parts. First, a new five-electrode C4D sensor was developed. Second, with two conductivity signals obtained by the developed sensor, the flow rate measurement was implemented by using the principle of cross correlation flow measurement. The experimental results showed that the proposed flow rate measurement method was effective, the developed five-electrode C4D sensor was successful, and the measurement accuracy was satisfactory. In five millimeter-scale pipes with different inner diameters of 0.5, 0.8, 1.8, 3.0 and 3.9 mm respectively, the maximum relative difference of the flow rate measurement between the reference flow rate and the measured flow rate was less than 5%.
Authors:
Haifeng Ji; Xuemin Gao; Baoliang Wang; Zhiyao Huang; Haiqing Li
Related Documents :
16901649 - Evaluation of antioxidant status and oxidative stress in cattle naturally infected with...
5046479 - Effect of vegetarianism and smoking on vitamin b12, thiocyanate, and folate levels in t...
18973429 - Cysteine, sulfite, and glutamate toxicity: a cause of als?
25384019 - Spidia-rna: second external quality assessment for the pre-analytical phase of blood sa...
801809 - Lactation: some cardiovascular and metabolic consequences, and the mechanisms of lactos...
21152899 - Relationship between altered small intestinal motility and absorption after abdominal a...
20706879 - Should ancillary brain blood flow analyses play a larger role in the neurological deter...
7929659 - The functional anatomy of attention in humans: cerebral blood flow changes induced by r...
19822139 - Impact of blood collection devices on clinical chemistry assays.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2013-01-25
Journal Detail:
Title:  Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)     Volume:  13     ISSN:  1424-8220     ISO Abbreviation:  Sensors (Basel)     Publication Date:  2013  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-01-28     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101204366     Medline TA:  Sensors (Basel)     Country:  Switzerland    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1563-77     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, Department of Control Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China. hfji@iipc.zju.edu.cn.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Sensors (Basel)
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Sensors (Basel)
ISSN: 1424-8220
Publisher: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
Article Information
Download PDF
© 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
License:
Received Day: 19 Month: 11 Year: 2012
Revision Received Day: 10 Month: 1 Year: 2013
Accepted Day: 14 Month: 1 Year: 2013
collection publication date: Year: 2013
Electronic publication date: Day: 25 Month: 1 Year: 2013
Volume: 13 Issue: 2
First Page: 1563 Last Page: 1577
PubMed Id: 23353139
ID: 3649368
DOI: 10.3390/s130201563
Publisher Id: sensors-13-01563

A New Method for Flow Rate Measurement in Millimeter-Scale Pipes
Haifeng Ji*
Xuemin Gao
Baoliang Wang
Zhiyao Huang*
Haiqing Li
State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, Department of Control Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China; E-Mails: gaoxuemin1103@163.com (X.G.); blwang@iipc.zju.edu.cn (B.W.); hqli@iipc.zju.edu.cn (H.L.)
* Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mails: hfji@iipc.zju.edu.cn (H.J.); zyhuang@iipc.zju.edu.cn (Z.H.).

1.  Introduction

Flow rate is one of the most important process parameters in many sectors, such as the chemical, pharmaceutical, petroleum, energy, and power engineering industries, etc. [15]. Currently, with the development of new technologies, the industrial devices and equipment present a trend of miniaturization [69]. More and more millimeter-scale devices/equipment are appearing, such as tube reactors, tube heat exchangers, etc. [68]. There is a practical need of effective techniques to measure the flow rate in millimeter-scale pipes.

Some commercial flowmeters may be used in millimeter-scale pipes, such as the constriction flowmeter, rotameter, turbine flowmeter, electromagnetic flowmeter, coriollis flowmeter, etc. [35,10,11]. The constriction flowmeter, rotameter and turbine flowmeter have constriction elements or moving parts in the pipe that disturb the fluid flow and cause a pressure drop. The Coriollis flowmeter also disturbs the fluid flow. Furthermore, this kind of flowmeter has the disadvantage of high cost. Although the electromagnetic flowmeter do not disturb the fluid flow, electromagnetic flowmeters have relatively high cost and their practical application in millimeter-scale pipes is also limited [35,10,11]. Therefore, it is necessary to seek more effective methods to solve the problem of flow rate measurement in millimeter-scale pipes.

Electrical conductivity is one of the basic physical parameters. Conductivity detection techniques have been adopted to implement flow rate measurements for many years and some achievements/progress have been obtained [12,13]. However, the conventional conductivity detection technique for flow rate measurement is based on contact conductivity detection. The detection electrodes are directly in contact with the fluid. That will cause polarization effects and electrochemical erosion effects. Meanwhile, if the electrode has been contaminated, unpredictable measurement errors will arise. Besides, the conventional conductivity detection techniques for flow rate measurement are used in normal scale pipes and few research works concerning the application of conductivity detection technique to the flow rate measurement in millimeter-scale pipes have been reported.

Capacitively Coupled Contactless Conductivity Detection (C4D) is a new conductivity detection technique, which was independently proposed by Zemann et al., da Silva and do Lago, in 1998 [14,15], on the basis of Gas' research work [16]. Compared with the conventional contact conductivity detection technique, C4D is a contactless detection technique and the electrodes of a C4D sensor are not in contact with the measured fluid. C4D can avoid the electrochemical reactions on the electrode surfaces and the polarization of the electrodes. Meanwhile, C4D sensors are low cost and more robust [1720]. Unfortunately, C4D is still a developing technique. To date, C4D has mainly been studied and applied in the research field of analytical chemistry for ion concentration/conductivity detection in capillaries (the inner diameter is usually less than 0.2 mm) [1420]. Little research concerning the application of C4D to the flow rate measurement in millimeter-scale pipes has been reported [1719,2124].

The aim of this work was to propose a new method for flow rate measurement in millimeter-scale pipes, combining the C4D technique and the principle of cross correlation flow measurement. The research work included two steps: first, a new five-electrode C4D sensor, which was suitable for the flow rate measurement in millimeter-scale pipes, was developed. Second, with two conductivity signals obtained by the developed sensor, the flow rate measurement using the principle of cross correlation flow measurement was implemented. Meanwhile, experiments were carried out in five millimeter-scale pipes with different inner diameters of 0.5, 0.8, 1.8, 3.0 and 3.9 mm, respectively, to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed flow rate measurement method.


2.  Five-Electrode C4D Sensor

Figure 1 inllustrates the principle of the C4D technique. As shown in Figure 1(a), a conventional C4D sensor includes an insulating pipe, two metal electrodes (an excitation electrode and a pick-up electrode) placed cylindrically around the outside of the insulating pipe, an AC source and a current pick-up unit. Figure 1(b) shows the simplified equivalent circuit of conventional C4D sensor. C1 and C2 are the coupling capacitances formed by the two metal electrodes, the insulating pipe and the conductive fluid. R is the equivalent resistor of the fluid between the two electrodes. Thus, an alternating current path is formed. The application of an AC voltage Vi on the excitation electrode will lead to an AC current flowing through the AC path. From the AC current obtained by the AC current pick-up unit, the conductivity detection can be implemented [1419].

For the conventional C4D sensor, from Figure 1 it can be seen that only the impedance of the resistor (R) is the useful signal. The impedances of the two coupling capacitances (C1 and C2) are the unfavorable background signals. The existence of the background signals has a negative influence on the conductivity detection and hence limits the resolution and the detection range [1827], so it is necessary to find an effective method to solve this problem [1820]. Laugere et al. have proposed a new detection method and have developed a four-electrode C4D sensor [2528]. In the four-electrode C4D sensor, four electrodes are placed cylindrically around the pipe. The outer two are excitation electrodes and the inner two are pick-up electrodes. A fixed AC current source is connected between the outer electrodes and a resulting differential voltage between two inner electrodes can be obtained by a high input impedance voltmeter. Thus, from the measured differential voltage, the measurement value of the fluid conductivity can be obtained. Compared with the conventional C4D sensor, the way of implementing the conductivity detection is different. The conventional current measurement way has been changed to a voltage measurement way, thus the existence of coupling capacitances (C1 and C2) has no influence on the conductivity measurement. Unfortunately, the detection method proposed by Laugere et al. is also a developmental technique. According to the latest technique reports, the four-electrode C4D sensor has been used in a channel with dimensions of 106 μm × 170 μm [2427]. However, there is still a lack of the knowledge and experience of the four-electrode C4D sensor in millimeter-scale pipes.

Although more research work should be undertaken, the detection method proposed by Laugere et al. provided a very useful reference for our research work. In this work, on the basis of Laugere et al.'s work, we developed a new five-electrode C4D sensor in millimeter-scale pipes. The construction of the new five-electrode C4D sensor was illustrated in Figure 2(a), along with a simplified equivalent circuit diagram given in Figure 2(b). The aim of this work was to implement the flow rate measurement using the principle of cross correlation flow measurement. According to the principle of cross correlation flow measurement, two independent conductivity signals were needed. A four-electrode C4D sensor could only obtain one conductivity signal, so an extra electrode was added. The new sensor became a five-electrode C4D sensor.

The new five-electrode C4D sensor consists of an insulating pipe, five cylindrical metal electrodes (one excitation electrode, one ground electrode and three pick-up electrodes), an AC source and a data acquisition unit. Cx1∼Cx5 are the coupling capacitances formed by the five metal electrodes, the insulating pipe and the conductive fluid. Rx1∼Rx4 are the equivalent resistors of the fluid between the two adjacent electrodes. Cx1, Rx1∼Rx4 and Cx5 form an alternating current path. When an AC voltage Vin is applied on the excitation electrode, an AC current I flowing through the AC path is generated. The AC current I can be determined by:

[Formula ID: FD1]
(1) 
I=VinZ
where Vin is the input voltage (AC source), and Z is the overall impedance of the AC path. At the frequency f of the input voltage signal, the overall impedance Z is:
[Formula ID: FD2]
(2) 
Z=Rx1+Rx2+Rx3+Rx4‐j(12πfCx1+12πfCx5)

The differential voltage Ux1 reflects the conductivity information of the fluid between electrode 2 and electrode 3 (up-stream sensor) and the differential voltage Ux2 reflects the conductivity information of the fluid between electrode 3 and electrode 4 (down-stream sensor). Ux1 and Ux2 can be expressed as:

[Formula ID: FD3]
(3) 
Ux1=IRx2
[Formula ID: FD4]
(4) 
Ux2=IRx3

Thus, two conductivity signals can be obtained by measuring the differential voltages Ux1 and Ux2.

Comparing Figures 1 and 2, it can be seen that the difference between the conventional C4D sensor and the new five-electrode C4D sensor is the way conductivity detection is implemented. The new five-electrode C4D sensor is based on the detection method proposed by Laugere et al., in which the conductivity measurement is mainly implemented by the voltage measurement technique and the existence of coupling capacitances has no influence on the conductivity measurement. Thus, in the new five-electrode C4D sensor, the unfavorable influence of the coupling capacitances on conductivity detection can be avoided and its linearity, accuracy, and sensitivity of the measurement can be improved [18,2527]. However, with the increasing dimension of the pipes, the impedances of the fluid resistors Rx2 and Rx3 decrease. That causes more difficulties for the low voltage measurement and electrical circuit design in millimeter-scale pipes. The electrical circuit and the signal processing circuit need to be specially designed in our research work.

The data acquisition unit can be roughly divided into two parts: the signal processing circuit and the data processing computer system. The function of the signal processing circuit is to demodulate and to amplify the conductivity signals obtained from the AC path. The function of the data processing computer system is to acquire the data and display the detection results (in this work, the data processing computer system was based on the data acquisition module of National Instruments (NI cDAQ-9172) and a microcomputer).

As shown in Figure 3, the signal processing circuit includes three parts: (1) Bootstrapping high input impedance amplifier buffer, which is used to obtain the voltage signals V1, V2, V3. (2) Differential amplifier, which is used to obtain two differential voltage signals V1-2, V2-3. (3) Demodulation circuit, which consists of Demodulation and Filter amplifier. Finally, two independent conductivity signals of fluid U1, U2 are obtained. Using these two independent conductivity signals, the flow rate measurement can be implemented according to the principle of cross-correlation measurement [4,5,2931].


3.  Flow Rate Measurement Implementation

The new five-electrode C4D sensor can obtain two independent conductivity signals (the differential voltages U1 and U2). According to the principle of cross correlation flow measurement, if we cross-correlate the two conductivity signals, the time delay τ between the two signals can be determined by searching for the time position of the maximum cross-correlation coefficient. The cross-correlation function RU1U2(τ) can be defined as:

[Formula ID: FD5]
(5) 
RU1U2(τ)=limT→∞1T∫0TU1(t)U2(t+τ)dt

The cross-correlation coefficient ρU1U2(τ) can be defined as:

[Formula ID: FD6]
(6) 
ρU1U2(τ)=RU1U2(τ)RU1U1(0)RU2U2(0)

Then the average flow velocity V can be calculated by the following equation [4,5,2931]:

[Formula ID: FD7]
(7) 
V=Lτ
where L is the distance between the centre of the combination of electrode 2 and electrode 3 and the centre of the combination of electrode 3 and electrode 4, as shown in Figure 2 (in the developed five-electrode C4D sensor, the combination of electrode 2 and electrode 3 and the combination of electrode 3 and electrode 4 can be regarded as two independent sensors of conductivity detection, the up-stream sensor and the down-stream sensor).

Thus, the flow rate Q0 can be calculated by the following equation:

[Formula ID: FD8]
(8) 
Q0=AV
where A is the sectional area of the pipe. Meanwhile, for practical cross correlation flow rate measurement, calibration is needed. The practical flow rate Q should be:
[Formula ID: FD9]
(9) 
Q=KAV
where K is the calibration coefficient.


4.  Experimental Results and Discussion

The experiments included two parts: first, the conductivity measurement experiments of the new five-electrode C4D sensor in millimeter-scale pipes were carried out to test the conductivity measurement performance of the new five-electrode C4D sensor. Second, the flow rate measurement experiments were carried out to verify the effectiveness of the proposed flow rate measurement method in millimeter-scale pipes.

4.1.  The Conductivity Measurement Experiments

The conductivity measurement experiments of the new five-electrode C4D sensor were carried out in five millimeter-scale pipes with different inner diameters of 0.5, 0.8, 1.8, 3.0 and 3.9 mm, respectively. The comparison conductivity measurement experiments between the new five-electrode C4D sensor and the conventional C4D sensor were also carried out. A commercial contact conductivity meter (FE30, Mettler Toledo Inc., 0.00 μS/cm∼199.9 mS/cm, ±0.5%F.S.) was used to obtain the reference conductivity data. The AC source was a function generator (CA1640-02, RIGOL Technologies Inc.). The signal frequency of the input voltage (AC source) was 10 kHz for the new five-electrode C4D sensors with the inner diameter of 0.5 and 0.8 mm, 60 kHz for the new five-electrode C4D sensors with the inner diameter of 1.8 and 3.0 mm and 120 kHz for the new five-electrode C4D sensors with the inner diameter of 3.9 mm. The experimental material was KCl solution. The conductivity range of KCl solution was 0.1865 mS/cm∼13.21 mS/cm. The temperature was around 26 °C. The electrodes were made by painting five rings of silver paint over the glass pipes. The length of the electrodes and the distance between two adjacent electrodes were all 10 mm. The output of the new five-electrode C4D sensors was volt signal and the noise was millivolt signal. The signal‐to‐noise‐ratio could meet the requirement of the measurement. The output signals (the differential voltages U1 and U2) reflected the conductivity of KCl solutions, which could be seen from the Equations (3) and (4). Two calibration curves, which reflected the relationship between the conductivity of KCl solutions and the differential voltages U1, U2, were pre-determined respectively by experiments. Then the measurement values of conductivity were determined.

Relative difference between the reference data obtained by the commercial contact conductivity meter and the measurement value obtained by the new five-electrode C4D sensor was used to analyze the conductivity measurement results of the new five-electrode C4D sensor. The relative difference dc can be calculated by the following equation:

[Formula ID: FD10]
(10) 
dc=Sm−SrSr×100%
where Sr is the reference data obtained by the commercial contact conductivity meter, and Sm is the measurement value obtained by the new five-electrode C4D sensor.

Figure 4 showed a typical group of experimental results of five new five-electrode C4D sensors in millimeter-scale pipes with different diameters. Figure 5 showed a typical sensitivity plot of the new developed five-electrode C4D sensor (the inner diameter of the pipe was 0.5 mm) and the conventional C4D sensor (the inner diameter of the pipe was also 0.5 mm). The sensitivity can be defined as ΔUS (U is the voltage obtained by the sensor, and S is the value of conductivity). The experimental results showed that the design of the new five-electrode C4D sensor was successful. The measurement accuracy of the new five-electrode C4D sensor was satisfactory. Compared with the commercial contact conductivity meter, the maximum relative differences dc between the reference data obtained by the commercial contact conductivity meter and the measurement values obtained by the five new five-electrode C4D sensors (either obtained by the up-stream sensor or obtained by the down-stream sensor) were all less than 5%. The conductivity measurement experiments verified the new five-electrode C4D sensor was suitable for the cross correlation flow rate measurements in millimeter-scale pipes. Meanwhile, the experimental results also showed that the detection method proposed by Laugere et al. was suitable for the conductivity measurement in millimeter-scale pipes. That provided a useful reference/experience for other researchers' work.

4.2.  The Flow Rate Measurement Experiments

Figure 6 illustrated the experimental setup for flow rate measurement in millimeter-scale pipes. Tap water was the experimental material and milk acted as the tracer (since the stochastic fluctuation signals in single-phase flow is quite weak [2931], cross correlation flow measurement systems for single-phase flow usually use tracers in the pipe to effectuate stronger stochastic fluctuation signals and better signal-to-noise ratios [12,30,31]. In this work, milk was used as the tracer and it was slowly injected by a syringe pump). Tap water was driven into the pipe by syringe pump 1 or the high-pressure nitrogen tank. Milk was driven into the pipe by syringe pump 2. Tap water and milk were mixed at the mixer, flowed through a horizontal pipe and then passed through the new five-electrode C4D sensor. If the fluid flow rate was less than 3.6 L/h (60 mL/min), tap water was driven by syringe pump 1. The reference flow rate was obtained by syringe pump 1 (flow rate range: 0∼60 mL/min, accuracy: 0.35%). If the fluid flow rate ranged from 3.6 L/h to 25 L/h, tap water was driven by the high-pressure nitrogen tank. The reference flow rate was obtained by rotameter 1 (flow rate range: 2.5∼25 L/h, accuracy: 2.5%). If the fluid flow rate ranged from 25 L/h to 100 L/h, tap water was also driven by the high-pressure nitrogen tank. The reference flow rate was obtained by rotameter 2 (flow rate range: 25∼250 L/h, accuracy: 2.5%). The flow rate of milk tracer ranged from 0.006 L/h to 0.18 L/h.

The relative difference df, which was used to analyze the flow rate measurement results of the new five-electrode C4D sensor, can be calculated by the following equation:

[Formula ID: FD11]
(11) 
df=Qm−QrQr×100%
where Qr is the reference flow rate obtained by the rotameters or the syringe pumps, and Qm is the measured flow rate obtained by the new five-electrode C4D sensor.

According to the experimental results, the calibration coefficient K was 1.03 for the five-electrode C4D sensor with the inner diameter of 0.8 mm and was 1.0 for the five-electrode C4D sensor with the other four inner diameters, respectively. Figure 7 illustrates an example of the flow rate measurement. Figure 7(a) shows two conductivity signals obtained by the new five-electrode C4D sensor. Figure 7(b) shows the corresponding cross-correlation coefficient curve. The time delay between two conductivity signals τ = 0.0342 s, which was determined by seeking the peak position of the cross-correlation coefficient curve (Figure 7(b)). The maximum value of the cross correlation coefficient was 0.9322. In this work, the distance L = 20.0 mm, and the inner diameters of the glass pipe was 3.9 mm. Thus, the average flow velocity can be calculated, v = 0.5848 m/s, the flow rate Qm = 25.15 L/h. Meanwhile, the reference flow rate of tap water was obtained by the rotameter 1. In this experiment, the flow rate of tap water was 25 L/h and the flow rate of milk was 0.12 L/h. Thus, the reference flow rate Qr = 25.12 L/h. Comparing Qm with Qr, it could be found that the relative difference df of the flow rate was −0.12%.

Figure 8 showed the experimental results in five pipes with different inner diameters. The maximum relative difference df between the reference flow rate and the measured flow rate was less than 5%. The experimental results showed that the proposed flow rate measurement method, which combined C4D technique and the principle of cross correlation flow measurement, was effective. The new five-electrode C4D sensor was successful and was suitable for the flow rate measurement in millimeter-scale pipes.

Compared with the commercial flowmeters (such as the constriction flowmeter, rotameter, turbine flowmeter, electromagnetic flowmeter and coriollis flowmeter, etc.) mentioned in Section 1, the proposed method in this work had advantages of low cost and contactless detection. Compared with the existing cross correlation flowmeters based on the conventional contact conductivity detection technique, the proposed method in this work could avoid the polarization of the electrodes and the electrochemical erosion on the electrode surfaces. Furthermore, the proposed method was suitable for the flow rate measurement in millimeter-scale pipes.


5.  Conclusions

In this research, a new method, which combined the C4D technique and the principle of cross correlation flow measurement, was proposed for flow rate measurement in millimeter-scale pipes. A new five-electrode C4D sensor was developed. Meanwhile, experiments were carried out in five millimeter-scale pipes with different inner diameters. The research results showed that the flow rate measurement of this method had a relative difference lower than 5%, which was considered accurate and satisfactory for the flow rate measurement application in millimeter-scale pipes. As a preliminary study, this research work verified the feasibility of the application of C4D technique to the flow rate measurement in millimeter-scale pipes. However, more research works (improving the measurement accuracy, extending the application scope, etc.) should be undertaken in this area. Optimization of the length of the electrodes and the distance between two adjacent electrodes will be topics for our further research works. Meanwhile, to improve the signal-to-noise rate of the five-electrode C4D sensor and then to implement the flow rate measurement without the help of the tracer is also a challenge in future.


This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51076141, No. 61074173 and No.11132008).


References
1.. Goldstein R.J.. Fluid Mechanics Measurements2nd ed.Taylor & FrancisPhiladelphia, PA, USAYear: 1996
2.. Nakra B.C.,Chaudhry K.K.. Instrumentation, Measurement and Analysis2nd ed.Tata McGraw-Hill EducationNew Delhi, IndiaYear: 2004289
3.. Pereira M.. Flow meters: Part 1IEEE Instru. Meas. Mag.Year: 2009121826
4.. Baker R.C.. Flow Measurement HandbookCambridge University PressNew York, NY, USAYear: 2000
5.. Spitzer D.W.. Industrial Flow Measurement3rd ed.The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society (ISA)New York, NY, USAYear: 2005
6.. Kandlikar S.G.. Fundamental issues related to flow boiling in minichannels and microchannelsExp. Therm. Fluid Sci.Year: 200226389407
7.. Bergles E.. Boiling and evaporation in small diameter channelsHeat Transf. Eng.Year: 2003241840
8.. Kandlikar S.G.. Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow in Minichannels and MicrochannelsElsevierOxford, UKYear: 20061136
9.. Sproston J.L.. Flow measurement-future directionsSens. Rev.Year: 200222190191
10.. Smith J.. Flowmeter reviewSens. Rev.Year: 1995151114
11.. Pereira M.. Tutorial 20: Flow meters: Part2IEEE Instru. Meas. Mag.Year: 2009121826
12.. Sokolov M.,Mashaal M.. Velocity measurements in slow flow by the conductance-tracer methodExp. FluidsYear: 19909252256
13.. Lucas G.P.,Cory J.C.,Waterfall R.C.. A six-electrode local probe for measuring solids velocity and volume fraction profiles in solids-water flowsMeas. Sci. Technol.Year: 20001114981509
14.. Zemann A.J.,Schnell E.,Volgger D.,Bonn G.K.. Contactless conductivity detection for capillary electrophoresisAnal. Chem.Year: 19987056356721644754
15.. da Silva J.A.F.,do Lago C.L.. An oscillometric detector for capillary electrophoresisAnal. Chem.Year: 19987043394343
16.. Gas B.,Demjanenko M.,Vacik J.. High-frequency contactless conductivity detection in isotachophoresisJ. Chromatogr. AYear: 1980192253257
17.. Kuban P.,Hauser P.C.. A review of the recent achievements in capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detectionAnal. Chim. ActaYear: 2008607152918155405
18.. Huang Z.Y.,Jiang W.W.,Zhou X.M.,Wang B.L.,Ji H.F.,Li H.Q.. A new method of capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection based on series resonanceSens. Actuators BYear: 2009143239245
19.. Huang Z.Y.,Long J.,Xu W.B.,Ji H.F.,Wang B.L.,Li H.Q.. Design of Capacitively Coupled Contactless Conductivity Detection SensorFlow Meas. Instrum.Year: 2012276770
20.. Shih C.-Y.,Li W.,Zheng S.Y.,Tai Y.-C.. A resonance-induced sensitivity enhancement method for conductivity sensorsProceedings of 5th IEEE Conference on SensorsDaegu, Korea22–25 October 2006271274
21.. Kuban P.,Hauser P.C.. Capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection for microseparation techniques-recent developmentsElectrophoresisYear: 201132304221171111
22.. Coltro W.K.T.,Lima R.S.,Segato T.P.,Carrilho E.. Capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection on microfluidic systems—Ten years of developmentAnal. MethodsYear: 201242533
23.. Brito-Neto J.,Fracassi da Silva J.,Blanes L.,do Lago C.. Understanding capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection in capillary and microchip electrophoresis. Part I. FundamentalsElectroanalysisYear: 20051711981206
24.. Pumera M.. Contactless conductivity detection for microfluidics: Designs and applicationsTalantaYear: 20077435836418371649
25.. Laugere F.,Lubking G.W.,Bastemeijer J.,Vellekoop M.J.. Design of an electronic interface for capacitively coupled four-electrode conductivity detection in capillary electrophoresis microchipSens. Actuators BYear: 200283104108
26.. Laugere F.,Lubking G.W.,Berthold A.,Bastemeijer J.,Vellekoop M.J.. Downscaling aspects of a conductivity detector for application in on-chip capillary electrophoresisSens. Actuators AYear: 200192109114
27.. Laugere F.,Guijt R.M.,Bastemeijer J.,Steen G.V.D.,Berthold A,Baltussen E.,Sarro P.,van Dedem G.W.,Vellekoop M.,Bosschet A.. On-chip contactless four-electrode conductivity detection for capillary electrophoresis devicesAnal. Chem.Year: 20037530631212553766
28.. Bastemeijer J.,Lubking W.,Laugere F.,Vellekoop M.. Electronic protection methods for conductivity detectors in micro capillary electrophoresis devicesSens. Actuators BYear: 20028398103
29.. Xu L.A.. Cross-Correlation Flow Measurement TechniqueTianjin University PressTianjin, ChinaYear: 1988
30.. Worch A.. A clamp-on ultrasonic cross correlation flow meter for one-phase flowMeas. Sci. Technol.Year: 19989622630
31.. Beck M.S.,Plaskowski A.. Cross Correlation Flowmeters—Their Design and ApplicationAdam HilgerBristol, UKYear: 1987

Article Categories:
  • Article

Keywords: flow rate measurement, Capacitively Coupled Contactless Conductivity Detection, cross correlation flow measurement, millimeter-scale pipes.

Previous Document:  Breathing-controlled Electrical Stimulation (BreEStim) for management of neuropathic pain and spasti...
Next Document:  Fast Classification of Meat Spoilage Markers Using Nanostructured ZnO Thin Films and Unsupervised Fe...