A new method for flow rate measurement in millimeterscale pipes.  
Jump to Full Text  
MedLine Citation:

PMID: 23353139 Owner: NLM Status: InDataReview 
Abstract/OtherAbstract:

Combining the Capacitively Coupled Contactless Conductivity Detection (C4D) technique and the principle of cross correlation flow measurement, a new method for flow rate measurement in millimeterscale pipes was proposed. The research work included two parts. First, a new fiveelectrode C4D sensor was developed. Second, with two conductivity signals obtained by the developed sensor, the flow rate measurement was implemented by using the principle of cross correlation flow measurement. The experimental results showed that the proposed flow rate measurement method was effective, the developed fiveelectrode C4D sensor was successful, and the measurement accuracy was satisfactory. In five millimeterscale pipes with different inner diameters of 0.5, 0.8, 1.8, 3.0 and 3.9 mm respectively, the maximum relative difference of the flow rate measurement between the reference flow rate and the measured flow rate was less than 5%. 
Authors:

Haifeng Ji; Xuemin Gao; Baoliang Wang; Zhiyao Huang; Haiqing Li 
Related Documents
:

23367279  Application of decision tree in the prediction of periventricular leukomalacia (pvl) oc... 11542339  Effect of long term bed rest in men on enzymatic antioxidative defence and lipid peroxi... 16901649  Evaluation of antioxidant status and oxidative stress in cattle naturally infected with... 20576169  Blood and milk immune and inflammatory profiles in periparturient dairy cows showing a ... 17706189  Glutathione status in the blood and tissues of patients with virusoriginated hepatocel... 7141119  Milk flow and sucking rates during breastfeeding. 305959  Modification of oestrogeninduced uterine hyperaemia by drugs in the ovariectomized rat. 2611369  Steady flow of couple stress fluid through tubes of slowly varying crosssectionsappl... 16686849  Inline filtration of autologous whole blood. 
Publication Detail:

Type: Journal Article Date: 20130125 
Journal Detail:

Title: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Volume: 13 ISSN: 14248220 ISO Abbreviation: Sensors (Basel) Publication Date: 2013 
Date Detail:

Created Date: 20130128 Completed Date:  Revised Date:  
Medline Journal Info:

Nlm Unique ID: 101204366 Medline TA: Sensors (Basel) Country: Switzerland 
Other Details:

Languages: eng Pagination: 156377 Citation Subset: IM 
Affiliation:

State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, Department of Control Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China. hfji@iipc.zju.edu.cn. 
Export Citation:

APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex 
MeSH Terms  
Descriptor/Qualifier:

Full Text  
Journal Information Journal ID (nlmta): Sensors (Basel) Journal ID (isoabbrev): Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 14248220 Publisher: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 
Article Information Download PDF © 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. License: Received Day: 19 Month: 11 Year: 2012 Revision Received Day: 10 Month: 1 Year: 2013 Accepted Day: 14 Month: 1 Year: 2013 collection publication date: Year: 2013 Electronic publication date: Day: 25 Month: 1 Year: 2013 Volume: 13 Issue: 2 First Page: 1563 Last Page: 1577 PubMed Id: 23353139 ID: 3649368 DOI: 10.3390/s130201563 Publisher Id: sensors1301563 
A New Method for Flow Rate Measurement in MillimeterScale Pipes  
Haifeng Ji*  
Xuemin Gao  
Baoliang Wang  
Zhiyao Huang*  
Haiqing Li  
State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, Department of Control Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China; EMails: gaoxuemin1103@163.com (X.G.); blwang@iipc.zju.edu.cn (B.W.); hqli@iipc.zju.edu.cn (H.L.) 

* Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; EMails: hfji@iipc.zju.edu.cn (H.J.); zyhuang@iipc.zju.edu.cn (Z.H.). 
Flow rate is one of the most important process parameters in many sectors, such as the chemical, pharmaceutical, petroleum, energy, and power engineering industries, etc. [^{1}–^{5}]. Currently, with the development of new technologies, the industrial devices and equipment present a trend of miniaturization [^{6}–^{9}]. More and more millimeterscale devices/equipment are appearing, such as tube reactors, tube heat exchangers, etc. [^{6}–^{8}]. There is a practical need of effective techniques to measure the flow rate in millimeterscale pipes.
Some commercial flowmeters may be used in millimeterscale pipes, such as the constriction flowmeter, rotameter, turbine flowmeter, electromagnetic flowmeter, coriollis flowmeter, etc. [^{3}–^{5},^{10},^{11}]. The constriction flowmeter, rotameter and turbine flowmeter have constriction elements or moving parts in the pipe that disturb the fluid flow and cause a pressure drop. The Coriollis flowmeter also disturbs the fluid flow. Furthermore, this kind of flowmeter has the disadvantage of high cost. Although the electromagnetic flowmeter do not disturb the fluid flow, electromagnetic flowmeters have relatively high cost and their practical application in millimeterscale pipes is also limited [^{3}–^{5},^{10},^{11}]. Therefore, it is necessary to seek more effective methods to solve the problem of flow rate measurement in millimeterscale pipes.
Electrical conductivity is one of the basic physical parameters. Conductivity detection techniques have been adopted to implement flow rate measurements for many years and some achievements/progress have been obtained [^{12},^{13}]. However, the conventional conductivity detection technique for flow rate measurement is based on contact conductivity detection. The detection electrodes are directly in contact with the fluid. That will cause polarization effects and electrochemical erosion effects. Meanwhile, if the electrode has been contaminated, unpredictable measurement errors will arise. Besides, the conventional conductivity detection techniques for flow rate measurement are used in normal scale pipes and few research works concerning the application of conductivity detection technique to the flow rate measurement in millimeterscale pipes have been reported.
Capacitively Coupled Contactless Conductivity Detection (C^{4}D) is a new conductivity detection technique, which was independently proposed by Zemann et al., da Silva and do Lago, in 1998 [^{14},^{15}], on the basis of Gas' research work [^{16}]. Compared with the conventional contact conductivity detection technique, C^{4}D is a contactless detection technique and the electrodes of a C^{4}D sensor are not in contact with the measured fluid. C^{4}D can avoid the electrochemical reactions on the electrode surfaces and the polarization of the electrodes. Meanwhile, C^{4}D sensors are low cost and more robust [^{17}–^{20}]. Unfortunately, C^{4}D is still a developing technique. To date, C^{4}D has mainly been studied and applied in the research field of analytical chemistry for ion concentration/conductivity detection in capillaries (the inner diameter is usually less than 0.2 mm) [^{14}–^{20}]. Little research concerning the application of C^{4}D to the flow rate measurement in millimeterscale pipes has been reported [^{17}–^{19},^{21}–^{24}].
The aim of this work was to propose a new method for flow rate measurement in millimeterscale pipes, combining the C^{4}D technique and the principle of cross correlation flow measurement. The research work included two steps: first, a new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor, which was suitable for the flow rate measurement in millimeterscale pipes, was developed. Second, with two conductivity signals obtained by the developed sensor, the flow rate measurement using the principle of cross correlation flow measurement was implemented. Meanwhile, experiments were carried out in five millimeterscale pipes with different inner diameters of 0.5, 0.8, 1.8, 3.0 and 3.9 mm, respectively, to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed flow rate measurement method.
Figure 1 inllustrates the principle of the C^{4}D technique. As shown in Figure 1(a), a conventional C^{4}D sensor includes an insulating pipe, two metal electrodes (an excitation electrode and a pickup electrode) placed cylindrically around the outside of the insulating pipe, an AC source and a current pickup unit. Figure 1(b) shows the simplified equivalent circuit of conventional C^{4}D sensor. C_{1} and C_{2} are the coupling capacitances formed by the two metal electrodes, the insulating pipe and the conductive fluid. R is the equivalent resistor of the fluid between the two electrodes. Thus, an alternating current path is formed. The application of an AC voltage V_{i} on the excitation electrode will lead to an AC current flowing through the AC path. From the AC current obtained by the AC current pickup unit, the conductivity detection can be implemented [^{14}–^{19}].
For the conventional C^{4}D sensor, from Figure 1 it can be seen that only the impedance of the resistor (R) is the useful signal. The impedances of the two coupling capacitances (C_{1} and C_{2}) are the unfavorable background signals. The existence of the background signals has a negative influence on the conductivity detection and hence limits the resolution and the detection range [^{18}–^{27}], so it is necessary to find an effective method to solve this problem [^{18}–^{20}]. Laugere et al. have proposed a new detection method and have developed a fourelectrode C^{4}D sensor [^{25}–^{28}]. In the fourelectrode C^{4}D sensor, four electrodes are placed cylindrically around the pipe. The outer two are excitation electrodes and the inner two are pickup electrodes. A fixed AC current source is connected between the outer electrodes and a resulting differential voltage between two inner electrodes can be obtained by a high input impedance voltmeter. Thus, from the measured differential voltage, the measurement value of the fluid conductivity can be obtained. Compared with the conventional C^{4}D sensor, the way of implementing the conductivity detection is different. The conventional current measurement way has been changed to a voltage measurement way, thus the existence of coupling capacitances (C_{1} and C_{2}) has no influence on the conductivity measurement. Unfortunately, the detection method proposed by Laugere et al. is also a developmental technique. According to the latest technique reports, the fourelectrode C^{4}D sensor has been used in a channel with dimensions of 106 μm × 170 μm [^{24}–^{27}]. However, there is still a lack of the knowledge and experience of the fourelectrode C^{4}D sensor in millimeterscale pipes.
Although more research work should be undertaken, the detection method proposed by Laugere et al. provided a very useful reference for our research work. In this work, on the basis of Laugere et al.'s work, we developed a new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor in millimeterscale pipes. The construction of the new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor was illustrated in Figure 2(a), along with a simplified equivalent circuit diagram given in Figure 2(b). The aim of this work was to implement the flow rate measurement using the principle of cross correlation flow measurement. According to the principle of cross correlation flow measurement, two independent conductivity signals were needed. A fourelectrode C^{4}D sensor could only obtain one conductivity signal, so an extra electrode was added. The new sensor became a fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor.
The new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor consists of an insulating pipe, five cylindrical metal electrodes (one excitation electrode, one ground electrode and three pickup electrodes), an AC source and a data acquisition unit. C_{x1}∼C_{x5} are the coupling capacitances formed by the five metal electrodes, the insulating pipe and the conductive fluid. R_{x1}∼R_{x4} are the equivalent resistors of the fluid between the two adjacent electrodes. C_{x1}, R_{x1}∼R_{x4} and C_{x5} form an alternating current path. When an AC voltage V_{in} is applied on the excitation electrode, an AC current I flowing through the AC path is generated. The AC current I can be determined by:
(1)
I=VinZ 
(2)
Z=Rx1+Rx2+Rx3+Rx4‐j(12πfCx1+12πfCx5) 
The differential voltage U_{x1} reflects the conductivity information of the fluid between electrode 2 and electrode 3 (upstream sensor) and the differential voltage U_{x2} reflects the conductivity information of the fluid between electrode 3 and electrode 4 (downstream sensor). U_{x1} and U_{x2} can be expressed as:
(3)
Ux1=IRx2 
(4)
Ux2=IRx3 
Thus, two conductivity signals can be obtained by measuring the differential voltages U_{x1} and U_{x2}.
Comparing Figures 1 and 2, it can be seen that the difference between the conventional C^{4}D sensor and the new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor is the way conductivity detection is implemented. The new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor is based on the detection method proposed by Laugere et al., in which the conductivity measurement is mainly implemented by the voltage measurement technique and the existence of coupling capacitances has no influence on the conductivity measurement. Thus, in the new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor, the unfavorable influence of the coupling capacitances on conductivity detection can be avoided and its linearity, accuracy, and sensitivity of the measurement can be improved [^{18},^{25}–^{27}]. However, with the increasing dimension of the pipes, the impedances of the fluid resistors R_{x2} and R_{x3} decrease. That causes more difficulties for the low voltage measurement and electrical circuit design in millimeterscale pipes. The electrical circuit and the signal processing circuit need to be specially designed in our research work.
The data acquisition unit can be roughly divided into two parts: the signal processing circuit and the data processing computer system. The function of the signal processing circuit is to demodulate and to amplify the conductivity signals obtained from the AC path. The function of the data processing computer system is to acquire the data and display the detection results (in this work, the data processing computer system was based on the data acquisition module of National Instruments (NI cDAQ9172) and a microcomputer).
As shown in Figure 3, the signal processing circuit includes three parts: (1) Bootstrapping high input impedance amplifier buffer, which is used to obtain the voltage signals V_{1}, V_{2}, V_{3}. (2) Differential amplifier, which is used to obtain two differential voltage signals V_{12}, V_{23}. (3) Demodulation circuit, which consists of Demodulation and Filter amplifier. Finally, two independent conductivity signals of fluid U_{1}, U_{2} are obtained. Using these two independent conductivity signals, the flow rate measurement can be implemented according to the principle of crosscorrelation measurement [^{4},^{5},^{29}–^{31}].
The new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor can obtain two independent conductivity signals (the differential voltages U_{1} and U_{2}). According to the principle of cross correlation flow measurement, if we crosscorrelate the two conductivity signals, the time delay τ between the two signals can be determined by searching for the time position of the maximum crosscorrelation coefficient. The crosscorrelation function R_{U1}_{U2}(τ) can be defined as:
(5)
RU1U2(τ)=limT→∞1T∫0TU1(t)U2(t+τ)dt 
The crosscorrelation coefficient ρ_{U1}_{U2}(τ) can be defined as:
(6)
ρU1U2(τ)=RU1U2(τ)RU1U1(0)RU2U2(0) 
Then the average flow velocity V can be calculated by the following equation [^{4},^{5},^{29}–^{31}]:
(7)
V=Lτ 
Thus, the flow rate Q_{0} can be calculated by the following equation:
(8)
Q0=AV 
(9)
Q=KAV 
The experiments included two parts: first, the conductivity measurement experiments of the new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor in millimeterscale pipes were carried out to test the conductivity measurement performance of the new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor. Second, the flow rate measurement experiments were carried out to verify the effectiveness of the proposed flow rate measurement method in millimeterscale pipes.
The conductivity measurement experiments of the new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor were carried out in five millimeterscale pipes with different inner diameters of 0.5, 0.8, 1.8, 3.0 and 3.9 mm, respectively. The comparison conductivity measurement experiments between the new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor and the conventional C^{4}D sensor were also carried out. A commercial contact conductivity meter (FE30, Mettler Toledo Inc., 0.00 μS/cm∼199.9 mS/cm, ±0.5%F.S.) was used to obtain the reference conductivity data. The AC source was a function generator (CA164002, RIGOL Technologies Inc.). The signal frequency of the input voltage (AC source) was 10 kHz for the new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensors with the inner diameter of 0.5 and 0.8 mm, 60 kHz for the new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensors with the inner diameter of 1.8 and 3.0 mm and 120 kHz for the new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensors with the inner diameter of 3.9 mm. The experimental material was KCl solution. The conductivity range of KCl solution was 0.1865 mS/cm∼13.21 mS/cm. The temperature was around 26 °C. The electrodes were made by painting five rings of silver paint over the glass pipes. The length of the electrodes and the distance between two adjacent electrodes were all 10 mm. The output of the new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensors was volt signal and the noise was millivolt signal. The signal‐to‐noise‐ratio could meet the requirement of the measurement. The output signals (the differential voltages U_{1} and U_{2}) reflected the conductivity of KCl solutions, which could be seen from the Equations (3) and (4). Two calibration curves, which reflected the relationship between the conductivity of KCl solutions and the differential voltages U_{1}, U_{2}, were predetermined respectively by experiments. Then the measurement values of conductivity were determined.
Relative difference between the reference data obtained by the commercial contact conductivity meter and the measurement value obtained by the new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor was used to analyze the conductivity measurement results of the new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor. The relative difference d_{c} can be calculated by the following equation:
(10)
dc=Sm−SrSr×100% 
Figure 4 showed a typical group of experimental results of five new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensors in millimeterscale pipes with different diameters. Figure 5 showed a typical sensitivity plot of the new developed fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor (the inner diameter of the pipe was 0.5 mm) and the conventional C^{4}D sensor (the inner diameter of the pipe was also 0.5 mm). The sensitivity can be defined as ΔU/ΔS (U is the voltage obtained by the sensor, and S is the value of conductivity). The experimental results showed that the design of the new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor was successful. The measurement accuracy of the new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor was satisfactory. Compared with the commercial contact conductivity meter, the maximum relative differences d_{c} between the reference data obtained by the commercial contact conductivity meter and the measurement values obtained by the five new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensors (either obtained by the upstream sensor or obtained by the downstream sensor) were all less than 5%. The conductivity measurement experiments verified the new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor was suitable for the cross correlation flow rate measurements in millimeterscale pipes. Meanwhile, the experimental results also showed that the detection method proposed by Laugere et al. was suitable for the conductivity measurement in millimeterscale pipes. That provided a useful reference/experience for other researchers' work.
Figure 6 illustrated the experimental setup for flow rate measurement in millimeterscale pipes. Tap water was the experimental material and milk acted as the tracer (since the stochastic fluctuation signals in singlephase flow is quite weak [^{29}–^{31}], cross correlation flow measurement systems for singlephase flow usually use tracers in the pipe to effectuate stronger stochastic fluctuation signals and better signaltonoise ratios [^{12},^{30},^{31}]. In this work, milk was used as the tracer and it was slowly injected by a syringe pump). Tap water was driven into the pipe by syringe pump 1 or the highpressure nitrogen tank. Milk was driven into the pipe by syringe pump 2. Tap water and milk were mixed at the mixer, flowed through a horizontal pipe and then passed through the new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor. If the fluid flow rate was less than 3.6 L/h (60 mL/min), tap water was driven by syringe pump 1. The reference flow rate was obtained by syringe pump 1 (flow rate range: 0∼60 mL/min, accuracy: 0.35%). If the fluid flow rate ranged from 3.6 L/h to 25 L/h, tap water was driven by the highpressure nitrogen tank. The reference flow rate was obtained by rotameter 1 (flow rate range: 2.5∼25 L/h, accuracy: 2.5%). If the fluid flow rate ranged from 25 L/h to 100 L/h, tap water was also driven by the highpressure nitrogen tank. The reference flow rate was obtained by rotameter 2 (flow rate range: 25∼250 L/h, accuracy: 2.5%). The flow rate of milk tracer ranged from 0.006 L/h to 0.18 L/h.
The relative difference d_{f}, which was used to analyze the flow rate measurement results of the new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor, can be calculated by the following equation:
(11)
df=Qm−QrQr×100% 
According to the experimental results, the calibration coefficient K was 1.03 for the fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor with the inner diameter of 0.8 mm and was 1.0 for the fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor with the other four inner diameters, respectively. Figure 7 illustrates an example of the flow rate measurement. Figure 7(a) shows two conductivity signals obtained by the new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor. Figure 7(b) shows the corresponding crosscorrelation coefficient curve. The time delay between two conductivity signals τ = 0.0342 s, which was determined by seeking the peak position of the crosscorrelation coefficient curve (Figure 7(b)). The maximum value of the cross correlation coefficient was 0.9322. In this work, the distance L = 20.0 mm, and the inner diameters of the glass pipe was 3.9 mm. Thus, the average flow velocity can be calculated, v = 0.5848 m/s, the flow rate Q_{m} = 25.15 L/h. Meanwhile, the reference flow rate of tap water was obtained by the rotameter 1. In this experiment, the flow rate of tap water was 25 L/h and the flow rate of milk was 0.12 L/h. Thus, the reference flow rate Q_{r} = 25.12 L/h. Comparing Q_{m} with Q_{r}, it could be found that the relative difference d_{f} of the flow rate was −0.12%.
Figure 8 showed the experimental results in five pipes with different inner diameters. The maximum relative difference d_{f} between the reference flow rate and the measured flow rate was less than 5%. The experimental results showed that the proposed flow rate measurement method, which combined C^{4}D technique and the principle of cross correlation flow measurement, was effective. The new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor was successful and was suitable for the flow rate measurement in millimeterscale pipes.
Compared with the commercial flowmeters (such as the constriction flowmeter, rotameter, turbine flowmeter, electromagnetic flowmeter and coriollis flowmeter, etc.) mentioned in Section 1, the proposed method in this work had advantages of low cost and contactless detection. Compared with the existing cross correlation flowmeters based on the conventional contact conductivity detection technique, the proposed method in this work could avoid the polarization of the electrodes and the electrochemical erosion on the electrode surfaces. Furthermore, the proposed method was suitable for the flow rate measurement in millimeterscale pipes.
In this research, a new method, which combined the C^{4}D technique and the principle of cross correlation flow measurement, was proposed for flow rate measurement in millimeterscale pipes. A new fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor was developed. Meanwhile, experiments were carried out in five millimeterscale pipes with different inner diameters. The research results showed that the flow rate measurement of this method had a relative difference lower than 5%, which was considered accurate and satisfactory for the flow rate measurement application in millimeterscale pipes. As a preliminary study, this research work verified the feasibility of the application of C^{4}D technique to the flow rate measurement in millimeterscale pipes. However, more research works (improving the measurement accuracy, extending the application scope, etc.) should be undertaken in this area. Optimization of the length of the electrodes and the distance between two adjacent electrodes will be topics for our further research works. Meanwhile, to improve the signaltonoise rate of the fiveelectrode C^{4}D sensor and then to implement the flow rate measurement without the help of the tracer is also a challenge in future.
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51076141, No. 61074173 and No.11132008).
References
1..  Goldstein R.J.. Fluid Mechanics Measurements2nd ed.Taylor & FrancisPhiladelphia, PA, USAYear: 1996 
2..  Nakra B.C.,Chaudhry K.K.. Instrumentation, Measurement and Analysis2nd ed.Tata McGrawHill EducationNew Delhi, IndiaYear: 2004289 
3..  Pereira M.. Flow meters: Part 1IEEE Instru. Meas. Mag.Year: 2009121826 
4..  Baker R.C.. Flow Measurement HandbookCambridge University PressNew York, NY, USAYear: 2000 
5..  Spitzer D.W.. Industrial Flow Measurement3rd ed.The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society (ISA)New York, NY, USAYear: 2005 
6..  Kandlikar S.G.. Fundamental issues related to flow boiling in minichannels and microchannelsExp. Therm. Fluid Sci.Year: 200226389407 
7..  Bergles E.. Boiling and evaporation in small diameter channelsHeat Transf. Eng.Year: 2003241840 
8..  Kandlikar S.G.. Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow in Minichannels and MicrochannelsElsevierOxford, UKYear: 20061136 
9..  Sproston J.L.. Flow measurementfuture directionsSens. Rev.Year: 200222190191 
10..  Smith J.. Flowmeter reviewSens. Rev.Year: 1995151114 
11..  Pereira M.. Tutorial 20: Flow meters: Part2IEEE Instru. Meas. Mag.Year: 2009121826 
12..  Sokolov M.,Mashaal M.. Velocity measurements in slow flow by the conductancetracer methodExp. FluidsYear: 19909252256 
13..  Lucas G.P.,Cory J.C.,Waterfall R.C.. A sixelectrode local probe for measuring solids velocity and volume fraction profiles in solidswater flowsMeas. Sci. Technol.Year: 20001114981509 
14..  Zemann A.J.,Schnell E.,Volgger D.,Bonn G.K.. Contactless conductivity detection for capillary electrophoresisAnal. Chem.Year: 19987056356721644754 
15..  da Silva J.A.F.,do Lago C.L.. An oscillometric detector for capillary electrophoresisAnal. Chem.Year: 19987043394343 
16..  Gas B.,Demjanenko M.,Vacik J.. Highfrequency contactless conductivity detection in isotachophoresisJ. Chromatogr. AYear: 1980192253257 
17..  Kuban P.,Hauser P.C.. A review of the recent achievements in capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detectionAnal. Chim. ActaYear: 2008607152918155405 
18..  Huang Z.Y.,Jiang W.W.,Zhou X.M.,Wang B.L.,Ji H.F.,Li H.Q.. A new method of capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection based on series resonanceSens. Actuators BYear: 2009143239245 
19..  Huang Z.Y.,Long J.,Xu W.B.,Ji H.F.,Wang B.L.,Li H.Q.. Design of Capacitively Coupled Contactless Conductivity Detection SensorFlow Meas. Instrum.Year: 2012276770 
20..  Shih C.Y.,Li W.,Zheng S.Y.,Tai Y.C.. A resonanceinduced sensitivity enhancement method for conductivity sensorsProceedings of 5th IEEE Conference on SensorsDaegu, Korea22–25 October 2006271274 
21..  Kuban P.,Hauser P.C.. Capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection for microseparation techniquesrecent developmentsElectrophoresisYear: 201132304221171111 
22..  Coltro W.K.T.,Lima R.S.,Segato T.P.,Carrilho E.. Capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection on microfluidic systems—Ten years of developmentAnal. MethodsYear: 201242533 
23..  BritoNeto J.,Fracassi da Silva J.,Blanes L.,do Lago C.. Understanding capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection in capillary and microchip electrophoresis. Part I. FundamentalsElectroanalysisYear: 20051711981206 
24..  Pumera M.. Contactless conductivity detection for microfluidics: Designs and applicationsTalantaYear: 20077435836418371649 
25..  Laugere F.,Lubking G.W.,Bastemeijer J.,Vellekoop M.J.. Design of an electronic interface for capacitively coupled fourelectrode conductivity detection in capillary electrophoresis microchipSens. Actuators BYear: 200283104108 
26..  Laugere F.,Lubking G.W.,Berthold A.,Bastemeijer J.,Vellekoop M.J.. Downscaling aspects of a conductivity detector for application in onchip capillary electrophoresisSens. Actuators AYear: 200192109114 
27..  Laugere F.,Guijt R.M.,Bastemeijer J.,Steen G.V.D.,Berthold A,Baltussen E.,Sarro P.,van Dedem G.W.,Vellekoop M.,Bosschet A.. Onchip contactless fourelectrode conductivity detection for capillary electrophoresis devicesAnal. Chem.Year: 20037530631212553766 
28..  Bastemeijer J.,Lubking W.,Laugere F.,Vellekoop M.. Electronic protection methods for conductivity detectors in micro capillary electrophoresis devicesSens. Actuators BYear: 20028398103 
29..  Xu L.A.. CrossCorrelation Flow Measurement TechniqueTianjin University PressTianjin, ChinaYear: 1988 
30..  Worch A.. A clampon ultrasonic cross correlation flow meter for onephase flowMeas. Sci. Technol.Year: 19989622630 
31..  Beck M.S.,Plaskowski A.. Cross Correlation Flowmeters—Their Design and ApplicationAdam HilgerBristol, UKYear: 1987 
Article Categories:
Keywords: flow rate measurement, Capacitively Coupled Contactless Conductivity Detection, cross correlation flow measurement, millimeterscale pipes. 
Previous Document: Breathingcontrolled Electrical Stimulation (BreEStim) for management of neuropathic pain and spasti...
Next Document: Fast Classification of Meat Spoilage Markers Using Nanostructured ZnO Thin Films and Unsupervised Fe...