| A national survey of U.S. internists' experiences with ethical dilemmas and ethics consultation. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 15009780 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
OBJECTIVE: To identify the ethical dilemmas that internists encounter, the strategies they use to address them, and the usefulness of ethics consultation. DESIGN: National telephone survey. SETTING: Doctors' offices. PARTICIPANTS: General internists, oncologists, and critical care/pulmonologists (N = 344, 64% response rate). MEASUREMENTS: Types of ethical dilemmas recently encountered and likelihood of requesting ethics consultation; satisfaction with resolution of ethical dilemmas with and without ethics consultation. RESULTS: Internists most commonly reported dilemmas regarding end-of-life decision making, patient autonomy, justice, and conflict resolution. General internists, oncologists, and critical care specialists reported participating in an average of 1.4, 1.3, and 4.1 consultations in the preceding 2 years, respectively (P <.0001). Physicians with the least ethics training had the least access to and participated in the fewest ethics consultations; 19% reported consultation was unavailable at their predominant practice site. Dilemmas about end-of-life decisions and patient autonomy were often referred for consultation, while dilemmas about justice, such as lack of insurance or limited resources, were rarely referred. While most physicians thought consultations yielded information that would be useful in dealing with future ethical dilemmas (72%), some hesitated to seek ethics consultation because they believed it was too time consuming (29%), might make the situation worse (15%), or that consultants were unqualified (11%). CONCLUSIONS: While most internists recall recent ethical dilemmas in their practices, those with the least preparation and experience have the least access to ethics consultation. Health care organizations should emphasize ethics educational activities to prepare physicians for handling ethical dilemmas on their own and should improve the accessibility and responsiveness of ethics consultation when needed. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Gordon DuVal; Brian Clarridge; Gary Gensler; Marion Danis |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Journal of general internal medicine Volume: 19 ISSN: 0884-8734 ISO Abbreviation: J Gen Intern Med Publication Date: 2004 Mar |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2004-03-10 Completed Date: 2004-06-24 Revised Date: 2009-11-18 |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 8605834 Medline TA: J Gen Intern Med Country: United States |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 251-8 Citation Subset: E; IM |
Affiliation:
|
Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Codes of Ethics Conflict (Psychology)* Disclosure Ethics Consultation* Ethics, Clinical* Ethics, Medical* Female Humans Internal Medicine / ethics* Male Patient Advocacy Physicians / ethics* Questionnaires |
| Comments/Corrections | |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: The frequency of Pap smear screening in the United States.
Next Document: Faculty self-reported experience with racial and ethnic discrimination in academic medicine.