Document Detail


The merits of blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer: a Cochrane review.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15033948     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
This paper is based on a Cochrane review published in The Cochrane Library, issue 2, 2002 (see www.CochraneLibrary.net for information) with permission from The Cochrane Collaboration and John Wiley and Sons. Cochrane reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to comments and criticisms, and The Cochrane Library should be consulted for the most recent version of the review. BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the relative merits of blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer, concerning the chance of pregnancy, live birth, multiple pregnancy and the factors contributing to these primary outcomes, from the best available evidence. METHODS: A systematic review employing the principles of the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group was undertaken. Fourteen randomized controlled trials, all comparing day 2/3 with day 5/6 embryo transfer, were included in a meta-analysis. RESULTS: For day 2/3 versus day 5/6 transfer, there was no significant difference in the odds of pregnancy [odds ratio (OR) = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-1.17] nor of live birth (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.48-1.42) per treated couple. These results were similar whether all trials, only trials with transfer of equal numbers of day 2/3 versus day 5/6, or only trials with transfer of fewer day 5/6 than day 2/3 embryos, were pooled. There was no significant difference in the odds of multiple pregnancy for day 2/3 versus day 5/6 transfer overall (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.52-1.13) nor when fewer day 5/6 than day 2/3 embryos were transferred (day 2/3 versus day 5/6 OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.42-1.12). CONCLUSION: The current evidence fails to support a widespread change of practice from cleavage stage to blastocyst stage embryo transfer in couples undergoing IVF.
Authors:
D A Blake; M Proctor; N P Johnson
Related Documents :
3171328 - Pregnancies following the interval double-transfer technique in an in vitro fertilizati...
429788 - A laboratory model for the investigation of contact transfer of micro-organisms.
17097088 - Impact of fresh-cycle variables on the implantation potential of cryopreserved-thawed h...
19409548 - Clinical predictors of human blastocyst formation and pregnancy after extended embryo c...
10820408 - Prenatal diagnosis of alobar holoprosencephaly by two-dimensional and three-dimensional...
3663248 - Developmental studies of hanford miniature swine exposed to 60-hz electric fields.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Evaluation Studies; Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Review    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Human reproduction (Oxford, England)     Volume:  19     ISSN:  0268-1161     ISO Abbreviation:  Hum. Reprod.     Publication Date:  2004 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2004-03-22     Completed Date:  2004-11-09     Revised Date:  2007-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8701199     Medline TA:  Hum Reprod     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  795-807     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Cochrane Menstrual Disorders & Subfertility Group Editorial Base, Obstetrics & Gynaecology Department, National Women's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. debbie.blake@aut.ac.nz
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Blastocyst*
Cleavage Stage, Ovum*
Embryo Transfer / standards*
Female
Fertilization in Vitro
Humans
Pregnancy
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Comments/Corrections
Erratum In:
Hum Reprod. 2004 Sep;19(9):2174   [PMID:  15756718 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Y chromosome microdeletion screening in infertile men in France: a survey of French practice based o...
Next Document:  Progesterone down-regulates insulin-like growth factor-I expression in cultured human uterine leiomy...