Document Detail


On markets and morals-(re-)establishing independent decision making in healthcare.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22270799     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Medical practitioners owe much of the significant progress made in the diagnosis and treatment of disease to industrial research. Hence, co-operation between providers of medical services, most notably medical practitioners, and the pharmaceutical industry is in the best interest of patients. Yet, empirical evidence shows how well-directed influence exerted by the pharmaceutical industry impacts physicians' decision-making. Profit-motivated inducement by the pharmaceutical industry may expose patients to considerable risks. Against what many think to be based on overwhelming evidence, Joao Calinas-Correia takes the view that the criticism levelled at the pharmaceutical industry as well as the call for transparency in the relationships between physicians and the industry are exaggerated. In his polemic he praises "Big Pharma" as a success and espouses the view that the undesired consequences of its activities are allegedly inherent in the underlying market environment shaped by politics. Moreover, he believes that the proposals made to control and eliminate such undesired effects will lead to mediocrity. Astonishingly, his polemic reaches out to contest the appropriateness of setting rules at all-even if being set by a democratic process. Calinas-Correia's assertions are based on the wrong premises. They fail to recognize that today individual civil rights and liberties often enough do not have to be defended against encroachments by governmental authorities. Rather, it is incumbent on the state to create rules designed to defend the individual against infringements by overly powerful non-governmental institutions, in our case the medical-industrial complex. Given the power exercised by physicians and the special nature of their role in public health, clear-cut rules have to be enacted and implemented with respect to their relationship to Big Pharma.
Authors:
Stephan Sahm
Related Documents :
17946729 - Gait evaluation of a new electromechanical stance-control knee-ankle-foot orthosis.
3101319 - A comparison of media for the enumeration of filamentous fungi from aqueduct biofilm.
17513939 - Elective induction: when? ever?
3875259 - The hypertrophied antral-pyloric fold.
2053229 - Multiparametric evaluation of testicular atrophy due to varicocele.
20685129 - Design and performance evaluation of single-use whole-sterile "plug & play" kits for ro...
20402209 - Capital crisis. caritas christi, detroit medical center turn to for-profit partners to ...
15036739 - Automated speech recognition for time recording in out-of-hospital emergency medicine-a...
10998849 - Medical students' attitudes towards behavioral sciences.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-1-20
Journal Detail:
Title:  Medicine, health care, and philosophy     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1572-8633     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2012 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-1-24     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9815900     Medline TA:  Med Health Care Philos     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
Medical Clinic I, Ketteler Hospital, Lichtenplattenweg 85, 63071, Offenbach, Germany, stephan.sahm@t-online.de.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Screening of intron 1 inversion and three intragenic factor VIII gene polymorphisms in Pakistani hem...
Next Document:  The desired moral attitude of the physician: (III) care.