| The management of test results in primary care: does an electronic medical record make a difference? | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 20455108 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is unknown whether an electronic medical record (EMR) improves the management of test results in primary care offices. METHODS: As part of a larger assessment using observations, interviews, and chart audits at eight family medicine offices in SW Ohio, we documented five results management steps (right place in chart, signature, interpretation, patient notification, and abnormal result follow-up) for laboratory and imaging test results from 25 patient charts in each office. We noted the type of records used (EMR or paper) and how many management steps had standardized results management processes in place. RESULTS: We analyzed 461 test results from 200 charts at the eight offices. Commonly grouped tests (complete blood counts, etc) were considered a single test. A total of 274 results were managed by EMR (at four offices). Results managed with an EMR were more often in the right place in the chart (100% versus 98%), had more clinician signatures (100% versus 86%), interpretations (73% versus 64%), and patient notifications (80% vs. 66%) documented. For the subset of abnormal results (n=170 results), 64% of results managed with an EMR had a follow-up plan documented compared to only 40% of paper managed results. Having two or more standardized results management steps did not significantly improve documentation of any step, but no offices had standardized processes for documenting interpretation of test results or follow-up for abnormal results. There was inter-office variability in the successful documentation of results management steps, but 75% of the top performing offices had EMRs. CONCLUSIONS: There was greater documentation of results managed by an EMR, but all offices fall short in notifying patients and in documenting interpretation and follow-up of abnormal test results. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Nancy C Elder; Timothy R McEwen; John Flach; Jennie Gallimore; Harini Pallerla |
Related Documents
:
|
1511548 - Engineering controls for clean air in the office environment. 7994388 - Structural and oxygen-binding properties of divinyl-sulfone-reacted bovine hemoglobin a... 1588528 - Medical audit: the differing perspectives of managers and clinicians. 16597818 - Practical experience of using directly observed procedures, mini clinical evaluation ex... 12872478 - The selection and use of essential medicines. report of the who expert committee, 2002 ... 8857058 - Sports medicine. overuse injuries. part 1: bone. |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Family medicine Volume: 42 ISSN: 1938-3800 ISO Abbreviation: Fam Med Publication Date: 2010 May |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2010-05-10 Completed Date: 2010-08-26 Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 8306464 Medline TA: Fam Med Country: United States |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 327-33 Citation Subset: IM |
Affiliation:
|
Department of Family Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0582, USA. eldernc@fammed.uc.edu |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Diagnostic Tests, Routine* Documentation / standards* Electronic Health Records / standards* Family Practice Humans Interviews as Topic Medical Audit Medical Records Systems, Computerized Ohio |
| Grant Support | |
ID/Acronym/Agency:
|
1 K08 HS013914-01A2/HS/AHRQ HHS |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Electronic Health Communication: An Educational Application for This Principle of the Patient-center...
Next Document: Using the electronic medical record to improve asthma severity documentation and treatment among fam...