Document Detail


The influence of misclassification bias on the reported rates of congenital anomalies on the birth certificates for West Virginia-A consequence of an open-ended query.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23450748     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Passive surveillance for congenital anomalies using birth certificates are generally considered to have biased reporting, though the sources of those biases are not well-known nor controlled for. We have analyzed the congenital anomaly reporting data for 418,385 live births in West Virginia (1990-2009) from the 1989 US standard birth certificate and have newly identified a particular source of bias. METHODS: Congenital anomaly prevalence rates per 100 live births have been determined for both specified birth defects and for other congenital anomalies by county, by hospital, and by year. Extreme outliers were identified by z score. Text strings for "other congenital anomaly" reports recorded for 1998-2009 were assessed for information on congenital anomalies. RESULTS: While rates for specified birth defects reported in checked-box format showed little variation, rates for "other congenital anomaly" collected in open-ended format showed much variation. Nearly half of the "other congenital anomaly" reports were for neonatal conditions rather than for major structural congenital anomalies. This misclassification alone had elevated the state-wide congenital anomaly reporting rate from 1.1 to 1.8% of live births. Geographic clustering and a temporal bulge in congenital anomaly reports disappeared after misclassified data were removed. CONCLUSIONS: Data collected in checked-box format on specified birth defects showed consistent patterns over time and space, while data collected in open-ended format on "other congenital anomalies" showed an epidemiological pattern reflecting neonatal conditions rather than birth defects. The 2003 US standard birth certificate wisely limits data collection to specified birth defects using the checked-box format. Birth Defects Research (Part A), 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors:
Ji Li; Shayhan Robbins; Steven H Lamm
Related Documents :
18030438 - Mechanical analysis of infant carrying in hominoids.
22434228 - Advanced necrotizing enterocolitis part 2: recurrence of necrotizing enterocolitis.
22848008 - Medium chain acyl-coa dehydrogenase deficiency detected among hispanics by new jersey n...
23247188 - Investigating the need of triggering the acquisition for infant diffusion mri: a quanti...
21274148 - Diagnosing and managing neonatal respiratory depression.
7120018 - Assessment of depression among incarcerated females.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2013-3-1
Journal Detail:
Title:  Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1542-0760     ISO Abbreviation:  Birth Defects Res. Part A Clin. Mol. Teratol.     Publication Date:  2013 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-3-1     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101155107     Medline TA:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Affiliation:
Center for Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH), Consultants in Epidemiology and Occupational Health, LLC, Washington, District of Columbia 20016; Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Markedly increased volume of distribution of gadolinium in cardiac amyloidosis demonstrated by T1 ma...
Next Document:  Long-term efficacy of a program to prevent beryllium disease.