Document Detail

An implausible model and evolutionary explanation of the revenge motive.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23211378     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
McCullough et al.'s target article is a psychological version of the reputation models pioneered by biologist Robert Trivers (1971) and economist Robert Frank (1988). The authors, like Trivers and Frank, offer an implausible explanation of the fact that revenge is common even when there are no possible reputational effects. I sketch a more plausible model based on recent research.
Herbert Gintis
Related Documents :
23367348 - Optimization strategies for rapid centroid estimation.
25123728 - "big data" and the electronic health record.
23060018 - The inheritance of process: a dynamical systems approachxs.
23466438 - Impact of precision of bayesian network parameters on accuracy of medical diagnostic sy...
16914278 - Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification ...
20144288 - Value of self-monitoring blood glucose pattern analysis in improving diabetes outcomes.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-12-5
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Behavioral and brain sciences     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1469-1825     ISO Abbreviation:  Behav Brain Sci     Publication Date:  2012 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-12-5     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7808666     Medline TA:  Behav Brain Sci     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  21-22     Citation Subset:  -    
Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501, and Department of Economics, Central European University, Nádor utca 9, 1051 Budapest, Hungary.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Preschool children with lower executive function may be more vulnerable to emotional-based eating in...
Next Document:  Herbal supplements in primary care: patient perceptions, motivations, and effects on use.