Document Detail


The impact of post-procedure interpretation of ERCP X-ray films by radiologists on patient care: should it be routine or selective?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  14520288     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Review of ERCP x-ray films by radiologists is routine, but the utility of this practice is unproven. The aim of this study was to assess whether the routine post-procedural interpretation of ERCP films by radiologists alters patient management. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 212 ERCPs followed by a prospective analysis of 112 ERCPs was performed. Comparative ductogram interpretations were categorized as: I, complete agreement; II, minor findings reported only by the radiologist; III, findings reported only by the endoscopist; and IV, major findings reported only by the radiologist that altered or should have altered management. RESULTS: In the retrospective analysis, 289 ductograms were identified, and interpretations were classified as: category I, 73%; category II, 16%; category III, 10.7%; and category IV, 0.3%. In the prospective study, interpretations of 167 ductograms were analyzed and classified as follows: category I, 84%; category II, 11%; category III, 5%; category IV, none. CONCLUSIONS: Post-procedure interpretation of ERCP spot x-ray films by radiologists adds little to patient management. Selective consultation with radiologists would appear to be more appropriate than review by radiologists of ERCP spot x-ray films on a routine basis.
Authors:
John T Sweeney; Raj J Shah; Stephen P Martin; Charles D Ulrich; Lehel Somogyi
Related Documents :
23212188 - Surgical management of irreparable rotator cuff tears.
7638998 - Outcome of microscopically nonradical, subtotal pancreaticoduodenectomy (whipple's rese...
9876068 - Long-term outcome of necrotizing pancreatitis treated by necrosectomy.
23523278 - The impact of arterial pedal arch quality and angiosome revascularization on foot tissu...
22067298 - Outcome of nerve transfers for traumatic complete brachial plexus avulsion: results of ...
23467838 - Ankle arthrodesis vs ttc arthrodesis: patient outcomes, satisfaction, and return to act...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Gastrointestinal endoscopy     Volume:  58     ISSN:  0016-5107     ISO Abbreviation:  Gastrointest. Endosc.     Publication Date:  2003 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2003-10-01     Completed Date:  2004-02-06     Revised Date:  2007-11-14    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0010505     Medline TA:  Gastrointest Endosc     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  549-53     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Disease Center, Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert B. Sabin Way, P.O. Box 670595, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0595, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde*
Diagnostic Tests, Routine / utilization*
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Referral and Consultation
Retrospective Studies
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
DK-58319/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  EUS-FNA of recurrent postoperative extraluminal and metastatic malignancy.
Next Document:  Perforation during colonoscopy in endoscopic ambulatory surgical centers.