Document Detail

The impact of different pacing strategies on five-kilometer running time trial performance.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17149992     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal 1.63-km (1-mile) pacing strategy for 5-km running performance in moderately trained women distance runners. Eleven women distance runners (20.7 +/- 0.8 years, 163.8 +/- 2.0 cm, 57.0 +/- 2.2 kg, 51.7 +/- 1.0, 18.9 +/- 0.8% fat, 78.1 +/- 1.4% VO(2)max at lactate threshold) performed 2 preliminary 5-km time trials on a treadmill to establish baseline 5-km times. The average 1.63-km split pace of the fastest preliminary trial was manipulated for the first 1.63 km of the experimental trials and run either equal to (EVEN), 3% faster than (3%), or 6% faster than (6%) the current baseline average 1.63-km pace for each subject. Ventilation (V(E)), oxygen consumption VO(2)max )), respiratory exchange ratio, and heart rate were measured continuously. Overall 5-km times were not different (p > 0.05) for the EVEN, 3% and 6% trials finishing in 21:11 (minutes/seconds) +/- 29 seconds, 20:52 +/- 36 seconds and 20:39 +/- 29 seconds, respectively. The fastest time for 8 subjects resulted from the 6% trial and the other 3 subjects' fastest times resulted from the 3% trial. The overall exercise intensity (%VO(2)max , %VO(2)max above lactate threshold, V(E), and respiratory exchange ratio) of the first 1.63-km split was not different between the 3 and 6% trials, despite the 6% trial being 13 seconds faster than the 3% trial. Based on these findings, initial 1.63-km starting paces of a 5-km race can be 3 to 6% greater than current average race pace without negatively impacting performance. In order to optimize 5-km performance, runners should start the initial 1.63 km of a 5-km race at paces 3-6% greater than their current average race pace.
Amy E Gosztyla; David G Edwards; Timothy J Quinn; Robert W Kenefick
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of strength and conditioning research / National Strength & Conditioning Association     Volume:  20     ISSN:  1064-8011     ISO Abbreviation:  J Strength Cond Res     Publication Date:  2006 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2006-12-07     Completed Date:  2007-01-30     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9415084     Medline TA:  J Strength Cond Res     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  882-6     Citation Subset:  IM; S    
Department of Kinesiology, University of New Hampshire, Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Durham, NH 03824, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Analysis of Variance
Body Composition
Exercise Test
Heart Rate / physiology
Lactates / blood
Oxygen Consumption / physiology
Physical Endurance / physiology*
Running / physiology*
Reg. No./Substance:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Aerobic and anaerobic correlates of multiple sprint cycling performance.
Next Document:  Nonadherence to depression treatment guidelines among veterans with diabetes mellitus.