Document Detail

The impact of behavioral intervention on obesity mediated declines in mobility function: implications for longevity.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22013527     Owner:  NLM     Status:  PubMed-not-MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
A primary focus of longevity research is to identify prognostic risk factors that can be mediated by early treatment efforts. To date, much of this work has focused on understanding the biological processes that may contribute to aging process and age-related disease conditions. Although such processes are undoubtedly important, no current biological intervention aimed at increasing health and lifespan exists. Interestingly, a close relationship between mobility performance and the aging process has been documented in older adults. For example, recent studies have identified functional status, as assessed by walking speed, as a strong predictor of major health outcomes, including mortality, in older adults. This paper aims to describe the relationship between the comorbidities related to decreased health and lifespan and mobility function in obese, older adults. Concurrently, lifestyle interventions, including diet and exercise, are described as a means to improve mobility function and thereby limit the functional limitations associated with increased mortality.
Authors:
Joe Nocera; Thomas W Buford; Todd M Manini; Kelly Naugle; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Marco Pahor; Michael G Perri; Stephen D Anton
Related Documents :
21604967 - Age and gender differences in the association between nt-probnp and glucometabolic dist...
25284977 - Projected changes in age-related macular degeneration and driving license holders in fi...
19296547 - The human urinary proteome reveals high similarity between kidney aging and chronic kid...
25471467 - Cognitive avoidant coping is associated with higher carotid intima media thickness amon...
23918557 - Prevalence and geographic distribution of herniated intervertebral disc in korean 19-ye...
10842277 - Prevalence of sporadic inclusion body myositis in western australia.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2011-10-16
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of aging research     Volume:  2011     ISSN:  2090-2212     ISO Abbreviation:  J Aging Res     Publication Date:  2011  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-10-20     Completed Date:  2011-11-10     Revised Date:  2014-01-17    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101543460     Medline TA:  J Aging Res     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  392510     Citation Subset:  -    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
T32 NS045551/NS/NINDS NIH HHS

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): J Aging Res
Journal ID (publisher-id): JAR
ISSN: 2090-2204
ISSN: 2090-2212
Publisher: SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright © 2011 Joe Nocera et al.
open-access:
Received Day: 14 Month: 4 Year: 2011
Accepted Day: 10 Month: 8 Year: 2011
Print publication date: Year: 2011
Electronic publication date: Day: 16 Month: 10 Year: 2011
Volume: 2011E-location ID: 392510
ID: 3195552
PubMed Id: 22013527
DOI: 10.4061/2011/392510

The Impact of Behavioral Intervention on Obesity Mediated Declines in Mobility Function: Implications for Longevity
Joe Nocera1, 2I2*
Thomas W. Buford2
Todd M. Manini2
Kelly Naugle2
Christiaan Leeuwenburgh2
Marco Pahor2
Michael G. Perri3
Stephen D. Anton2, 3I3*
1Department of Veterans Affairs, Rehabilitation Research and Development, Brain Rehabilitation Research Center Malcom Randall VA Medical Center, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
2Department of Aging and Geriatric Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
3Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
Correspondence: *Joe Nocera: jnocera@aging.ufl.edu and
Correspondence: *Stephen D. Anton: santon@aging.ufl.edu
[other] Academic Editor: Leonard W. Poon

1. Introduction

The term longevity can be used to refer to a “long life” for an individual or more broadly to life expectancy within a population. In recent years, scientists have devoted much attention to finding ways to increase longevity. To date, much of this work has focused on understanding the biological processes that may contribute to aging and age-related disease conditions. A number of potential biological targets have been identified during the past few decades, and a wide range of intervention approaches are currently being developed. The types of interventions considered to have the potential to affect the aging process include biochemical and genetic techniques, hormonal treatments, and behavioral approaches to reduce age-related comorbidities and thereby increase mean lifespan. Although biological approaches may have significant potential in the future, the effects of behavioral interventions on age-related conditions can be more immediately evaluated and put into practice at the present time.

To determine the effectiveness of behavioral interventions and other treatment approaches to increase longevity, a benchmark is needed that enables scientists to determine whether or not the intervention was successful. Because it is unrealistic to conduct lifespan studies in humans, a surrogate endpoint is needed to estimate the effect interventions could have on longevity. Recently, gait (i.e., walking) speed—a simple, valid, and reliable clinical test—was considered to be such an endpoint [1]. A growing body of literature has identified walking speed as a strong predictor of major health outcomes and mortality in older adults [24]. In a pooled analysis of nine cohort studies with follow-up periods ranging from 6 to 21 years, declines in gait speed were found to be directly associated with decreased survival [1]. Specifically, hazard ratios for survival revealed that there was a 12% risk reduction in mortality for every 0.10 meters per second increase in gait speed. As recently noted by Cesari [5], the findings of Studenski et al.'s pooled analysis provide the statistical foundations to estimate expected survival in older adults based solely on gait speed [1]. Based on these consistent and robust findings, we argue that gait speed may represent a useful marker of overall health status and may also be a useful prognostic indicator of mean lifespan in older adults. Further, because walking places demands on multiple organ systems and demands on input from the central nervous system, it may serve as the ideal target to evaluate the efficacy of interventions aimed at improving health and increasing lifespan.

Against the backdrop of these findings on the importance of mobility function, a growing body of literature indicates that obese, older adults are at particularly high risk of functional decline, marked by reductions in mobility (i.e., walking speed). This is of significant concern because the number and proportion of obese, older adults has increased dramatically during the past two decades [6]. Recent estimates indicate that an alarming 35% of older adults are obese and another 33% are overweight, which places them at risk for obesity [6]. This paper describes the key behavioral factors contributing to the development of obesity in older adults, the major pathways through which obesity affects mobility function, and the relationship between important comorbidities related to decreased lifespan and mobility function in obese, older adults. Concurrently, lifestyle interventions, including diet and exercise, targeted toward obese older adults are described as a means to target mobility function and limit the functional limitations associated with increased mortality risk.


2. Behavioral Mechanisms of Obesity in Older Adults

Both obesity and sedentary lifestyle appear to contribute to the body composition changes (i.e., increased body fat, decreased muscle mass) that promote age-related functional decline [79]. As such, obese, older adults may be particularly susceptible to the adverse effects of weight gain because of the loss of muscle mass that occurs with aging (i.e., sarcopenia) [10, 11]. Loss in muscle mass by itself is associated with impairments in mobility in older adults [12]. Moreover, the combination of muscle loss and fat gain may act synergistically to lead to further reductions in mobility in older adults [1315].

Excessive dietary intake, specifically, is a major factor influencing the overall health and body weight of older adults. Epidemiological studies indicate that per capita energy intake has increased by approximately 300 kcal per day from 1985 to 2000 [16]. Unfortunately, the trend of increasing dietary consumption also coincides with a trend to expend less energy with increasing age [17]. Physical inactivity represents another major contributor to the development of obesity and obesity-related morbidity [18]. Currently, the majority of older adults in the US do not engage in even the minimum physical activity recommendations [19]. Moreover, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently reported that 40% of adults engage in no leisure-time physical activity [19]. This is of particular concern in the elderly as older adults are less active with advancing age [17].


3. Impact of Obesity on Declines in Mobility

Obesity poses several threats to mobility during aging. Most notable is the direct effect of excess body weight on movement. As body mass increases, the energy and strength required to move the body increases correspondingly. Specifically, work from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging showed that total knee generative mechanical work expenditure is higher in older adults with obesity [20]. Similarly, work by Messier et al. [21] demonstrated that the absolute peak vertical ground-reaction forces increase almost directly in proportion with body weight. These factors likely contribute to the slower preferred walking speed consistently found in obese, older adults compared to nonobese, older adults [20].

A growing body of evidence also indicates that relative skeletal muscle mass (i.e., skeletal muscle mass/body mass), compared to absolute body mass, is a strong predictor of impairments in mobility performance, such as walking and stair climbing [22, 23]. For example, Janssen and colleagues [22] found that there is an increased likelihood of functional impairment and disability in older adults if muscle loss progresses to the point where skeletal muscle mass, relative to body weight, reaches 30% below the mean for young adults. Alarmingly, 45% of men and 59% of women in this sample of over 4,500 older adults (age ≥ 60 years) were classified as having sarcopenia, as determined by low relative skeletal muscle mass to body weight. Sarcopenia is strongly associated with the development of functional disability and can lead to the loss of independence for afflicted individuals [22, 24]. Typically, older adults lose an average of 1-2% of their muscle mass yearly after the age of 50 [25, 26]. However, recently the loss in muscle strength has been shown to decline at a faster rate (3–5%) than previously thought [27], and it has been argued that muscle weakness is a stronger predictor of these changes than muscle mass [24, 28]. Additionally, the combination of muscle weakness and obesity increases the risk of mobility impairment greater than obesity or muscle weakness alone [29]. The reductions in both muscle size and the function through maximal strength are important factors in the loss of mobility among older adults [30, 31]. Somewhat paradoxically, obese, older adults typically have more absolute total muscle mass and strength than nonobese peers. Despite this fact, obese individuals also have higher amounts of intermuscular adipose tissue, a potential detriment to the muscle's force-generating capacity [32, 33]. Furthermore, the disparity in total muscle mass is typically not sufficient to account for the disparity in body mass, meaning that obese persons have a lower strength to body mass ratio—an important factor in mobility. This paradoxical state of low (relative) muscle mass and high body weight has come to be known as sarcopenic obesity [34, 35]. These findings are particularly salient because both muscular strength and power, particularly in the weight-bearing lower limb muscle groups [36], have been strongly associated with habitual and maximal gait velocities, as well as other measures of physical function (i.e., chair stand time) in community-dwelling, mobility-limited, older adults [37]. Collectively, these works suggest that a low muscle/body mass ratio directly impairs movement among obese, older adults.

Musculoskeletal pain, often in the form of osteoarthritis, is also associated with obesity and directly impacts the ability of older persons to remain mobile. Complaints of pain in the leg joints related to osteoarthritis, particularly in the knee, are common in older adults. In fact, self-reported joint pain is often cited as the main factor affecting mobility in older adults [38]. Noteworthy, mobility limitations due to joint pain are compounded by obesity [39]. This is significant considering that most adults with knee osteoarthritis have a body mass in the overweight or obese range (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2) [40]. Additionally, the Women's Health and Aging Study found that obesity was a distinct risk factor for substantially increasing the risk of mobility disability among individuals with chronic pain [41]. In line with this, obesity has been identified as the main preventable risk factor for the onset and progression of osteoarthritis and the associated pain by some experts [42]. Importantly, individuals with chronic pain often modify and lessen their activity by walking and engaging in less physically demanding activities. As such, the age-related degeneration and the associated pain, which is compounded with obesity, can lead to significant reductions in activity.

In addition to the direct and immediate effects that excess body weight has on movement, obesity may have an overlooked, long-term impact on mobility function through the development of comorbid disease conditions. The development of such conditions, including cardiovascular disease and diabetes, may lead to mobility impairments beyond those observed during obesity alone. In fact, accumulating evidence indicates that older adults with diabetes, obese or not, experience more severe losses of muscle mass and strength than those who are not diabetic [43]. Although the mechanisms that cause this accelerated loss of mobility among older adults who have diabetes are unclear, much of the decline may be due to exacerbated changes in body composition typically observed in advanced age and/or obesity.

Collectively, studies to date indicate that excessive body weight, metabolic disease, and sarcopenia all contribute to declines in mobility function (see Figures 1 and 2) [1]. Significantly, comorbidities associated with metabolic disease and sarcopenia are prevalent in older adults, and the health consequences associated with each condition are compounded by obesity (Figure 1). Each of these conditions is directly associated with lifestyle habits. As previously discussed, excessive caloric intake and a sedentary lifestyle promote weight gain and contribute to the progression of age-related sarcopenia and declines in mobility function. Over time, these changes can accelerate the development of mobility impairments and disability (Figure 2). Although aging is the primary risk factor for both of these conditions, healthy dietary and physical activity habits have demonstrated efficacy in attenuating the progression of these conditions. In the next section, we will highlight important research findings over the past few decades demonstrating the beneficial effects of nutritional and exercise interventions on mobility function in obese, older adults.


4. Diet and Exercise Interventions to Improve Mobility Function in Obese Older Adults

A current challenge for clinicians and researchers working with overweight, older adults is to design lifestyle-based interventions that can produce significant weight loss while minimizing the loss of fat-free mass. Concerns about weight loss in obese, older adults relate to the documented declines in dynamic force production capability during aging, which are most notable in weight-bearing lower limb muscle groups [36, 44]. Caloric restriction is generally required to achieve significant weight loss; typically 1/3rd to 1/4th of the lost weight is fat-free mass, a significant concern for older adults. In contrast, exercise can preserve muscle mass [45, 46] and improve muscle quality [47, 48] in older adults, but does not typically produce significant weight loss by itself [49]. As such, identifying interventions designed to maximize functional improvement while limiting muscle mass loss during weight loss is a current challenge.

Weight loss through diet and exercise interventions may improve mobility through several mechanisms (see Figure 3). First, weight loss through caloric restriction could lessen the mechanical load on weak joints and muscles, thereby improving mobility. For example, Messier et al. found a direct association between weight loss and attenuation of knee joint moments and forces during walking in overweight and obese older adults with knee osteoarthritis following an 18-month, weight-loss intervention [21]. Specifically, this study found that each pound of weight lost was associated with a four times reduction in the load exerted on the knee per step, which would equate to more than 4,800 pounds less in compressive load per mile walked. Messier et al. [50] also looked at a subset of these participants dividing them into high, low, and no weight loss groups (groups lost 10.2%, 2.7%, and 0%, resp.). This study provided evidence that large weight loss in overweight and obese older adults reduces maximum knee compressive forces significantly more than small weight losses. Collectively, these results suggest that weight loss achieved through lifestyle changes can induce biomechanical improvements in knee joints loads during walking, thereby reducing or limiting mobility impairments. Below, we review the effects of lifestyle interventions involving both dietary and exercise modification on changes in mobility function in obese, older adults.

4.1. Calorie Restriction

Negative energy balance can be achieved by reducing energy intake or increasing energy expenditure. Calorie restriction (CR) has consistently been shown to extend lifespan and reduce age-related diseases in numerous species [51]. Emerging findings also suggest that CR can produce health benefits for nonobese humans (BMI range = 23.5–29.9), such as reductions in body weight and whole body fat mass [52] and beneficial effects on “biomarkers of aging” (i.e., fasting insulin level, core body temperature) in overweight individuals (BMI range = 25.0–29.9) [53]. The effects of CR on changes in mobility function in obese, older adults, however, are less well known. Two recent studies described below discuss the effect that diet-alone interventions may have on mobility and physical function in obese, older adults.

A recent study conducted by Avila and colleagues evaluated the effect of a 10-week dietary intervention compared to a diet plus resistance training (RT) intervention on physical functioning in obese, older adults [54]. Both groups significantly increased walking speed, documented by reduced time to complete the 400-meter walk test (reduction in time for diet: −36 sec; diet plus RT: −40 sec). These results suggest that diet alone may improve global mobility function in obese, older adults; however, these effects may be heightened when a dietary and exercise intervention are combined.

In an even more recent study, Villareal and colleagues conducted a clinical trial evaluating changes in physical function in obese, older adults who were randomized into a weight management program, exercise training program, weight management plus exercise training program, or control group [55]. The diet-only weight management program consisted of a balanced diet producing an energy deficit of 500 to 750 kcal per day from participants' daily energy requirements. The primary measure of physical performance was the modified Physical Performance Test which included several standardized tasks such as walking 50 feet, standing up from a chair, lifting a book, and climbing one flight of stairs. Compared to the control group, the diet-only weight management group significantly improved their score on the Physical Performance Test, increased peak oxygen consumption, lost more fat mass, and reduced the time needed to complete an obstacle course. It is important to note, however, that, while the weight management program improved physical function in obese, older adults, the combination of diet and exercise resulted in the greatest improvements in physical function. These results are discussed further below.

4.2. Exercise Training

Epidemiological data have clearly demonstrated a dose-response pattern for physical activity to reduce the risk of mobility limitations [56, 57]. Additionally, many small clinical trials have reported beneficial effects of aerobic exercise on physical capacity and gait speed [58, 59]. For example, Brown and Holloszy conducted a series of studies that clearly demonstrate that aerobic exercise alone is effective at increasing walking velocity through improvements from cardiovascular capacity in healthy lean, older adults [60]. Despite this knowledge, there has been little carryover to specific studies on obese, older adults. The studies discussed below provide information regarding general mobility adaptations to resistance and/or aerobic interventions in obese and nonobese older adults.

Resistance exercise is the best method of improving skeletal muscle performance. Accumulating evidence suggests that resistance training increases muscle strength in older adults, thereby greatly attenuating the losses of strength, power, and muscle mass that occur during aging [61, 62]. Moreover, resistance training has robust effects on the muscle strength and overall physical function of older adults [63, 64]. Further, recent studies have found that resistance-training interventions produce clinically meaningful improvements in gait speed in older adults with mobility limitations and that increased muscular power contributed to these improvements [65].

Numerous studies provide evidence that skeletal muscles, even among frail older adults, adapt vigorously to resistance training with marked myofibre hypertrophy [62]. This is an important finding considering that reductions in muscle power and strength are, at least in part, related to preferential type II myofibre atrophy [66]. For example, a study by Charette and colleagues found that a 12-week resistance training program in older women (mean age 69 years ± 1 year) significantly increased the cross-sectional area of the type II muscle fibers in comparison with an educational control group [61]. In another study, Fiatarone and colleagues examined the effects of an 8-week, high-intensity resistance program in ten frail, institutionalized older adults (90 years ± 1 year). The researchers found that mid-thigh muscle area increased by 9.0%  ±  4.5% and that mean tandem gait speed improved by 48% [62]. In addition, participants had an average strength gain of 174%. In another recent study, Ferri and colleagues assessed changes in muscle strength and power following a 16-week resistance program in a population of men between the ages of 65 and 81. The researchers found not only an increase in maximal force production but also a significant increase in muscle power [63]. These studies provide compelling evidence that a progressive resistance training program can reduce muscle atrophy, improve gait speed, and increase muscle power.

Combination exercise training programs are often used to meet the current physical activity recommendations by the ACSM/AHA which state that older adults should take a multifactorial approach to enhancing physical activity by performing aerobic, strength, and flexibility exercise. Findings from recent trials support the efficacy of interventions that incorporate both aerobic and resistance training (with or without dietary intervention) for improving physical function in obese, older adults [55]. Another recent clinical trial sought to determine whether combining aerobic and resistance exercise compared to either modality alone (i.e., combination versus aerobic exercise alone versus resistance exercise alone) would exert greater effects on risk factors for disease and disability [67]. Abdominally obese older men and women completed a six-month intervention consisting of either resistance exercise three times per week, aerobic exercise (treadmill walking) five times per week, resistance and aerobic exercise three times per week, or a nonexercise control. All intervention groups showed improvements in functional limitations; however, this improvement was greater for the combined exercise group compared to the aerobic-only exercise group. Furthermore, the combined and aerobic-only groups lost significantly more total fat and abdominal fat than the control and resistance-only group, while skeletal muscle mass was most improved in the combined and resistance exercise group.

However, there is contradictory information presented by Manini and colleagues that demonstrated that one year of aerobic and resistance exercise performed two times per week was ineffective at improving long-distance walking speed in obese men and women when compared to nonobese [68]. Despite little change in long-distance walking speed (400 meters), obese individuals did manage to gain clinically significant improvements in a short performance battery of physical function that includes chair rises, balance tests, and 4-meter walking test.

The most recent data by Villareal and colleagues help to confirm the independent effects of exercise (aerobic + resistance exercise) on mobility and physical function in obese men and women [55]. In this study, exercise alone (3 times per week) resulted in significant improvements in a battery of functional tasks that included walking 50 feet, climbing one flight of stairs, and performance on a Romberg balance test—a motor coordination test that requires subjects to maintain static balance under progressively more difficult altered base of support conditions. Additional functional tasks that improved in the Villareal study included putting on and removing a coat, picking up a penny, standing up from a chair, and lifting a book. Collectively, these effects were greater than a concurrent control group and exceeded the improvements in a group who completed a diet-only intervention.

Collectively, these studies suggest that exercise alone can have robust effects on physical function in obese, older adults. However, these effects might not exceed those found with nonobese individuals. Therefore, an exercise program combining aerobic and resistance exercise provides the most beneficial health effects in obese older adults.

4.3. Multicomponent Interventions

Many lifestyle interventions designed to improve physical function in obese, older adults have typically included both a dietary component and a physical activity program, and thus can be classified as a multicomponent intervention. Because studies that intervene with caloric restriction plus exercise generally demonstrate beneficial effects on long-distance walking ability [4], a multicomponent intervention that includes caloric restriction may be needed to optimize the benefits of moderate intensity physical activity in obese, older adults. A relatively small number of studies have examined the effects of multicomponent interventions that combine dietary restriction plus exercise in obese, older adults.

Findings from recent trials support the effectiveness of multicomponent (i.e., diet plus aerobic plus resistance exercise) interventions for improving mobility function in obese, older adults. For example, the addition of resistance training to a diet plus aerobic exercise program can attenuate the loss of skeletal muscle during weight loss in adults aged 65 and older [69]. Diet plus supervised resistance and aerobic exercise regimens have also been found to substantially improve mobility (i.e., walking speed) and function in obese, older adults [70, 71]. A recent study examined the effects of a 24-week multicomponent intervention compared to a Successful Aging Educational Control group on changes in mobility function in overweight, older women with moderate functional impairments. Participants in the weight loss plus exercise (WL + E) intervention condition were instructed to reduce their caloric intake by 500 to 1000 kcal/day and to attend weekly group-based counseling sessions, as well as three center-based supervised exercise sessions per week. The exercise regimen included an aerobic phase (15 minutes), a resistance-training phase (15 minutes), a second aerobic phase (15 minutes), and a cool-down phase (15 minutes). This intervention resulted in substantial improvements in mobility (i.e., increase in walking speed = 0.15 meters/second) in this high-risk population [72]. Participants in the Successful Aging Educational Control condition received weekly lectures on a variety of health topics relevant to older adults. Noteworthy, walking speed among participants in this group did not change. In a recent study, Avila et al. [54] examined the effect of a 10-week moderate intensity resistance training program combined with diet-induced weight loss on body and muscle composition and physical function in obese, older adults. The combination of resistance training and diet was found to be more effective than diet alone in producing fat loss, reducing intermuscular adipose tissue, and improving strength. However, no differences were found between groups on measures of physical function.

Another recent trial investigated the independent and combined effects of dietary and exercise interventions [55]. For this 52-week study, participants were assigned to a control group, caloric restriction group, exercise group, or a caloric restriction plus exercise group. The exercise intervention included both aerobic and resistance training components. While physical function (i.e., Physical Performance Test) improved for all the intervention groups compared to the control group, the diet plus exercise group exhibited significantly better physical function compared to the diet-only and exercise-only groups. Additionally, the diet plus exercise group lead to improved peak oxygen consumption, strength, balance, and gait speed compared to all other groups. These findings suggest that multicomponent weight loss interventions can significantly improve mobility and physical function in obese, older adults.


5. Conclusions

Obesity is a major health concern in most developed countries. When combined with advance age, the detrimental health effects of obesity are magnified. These negative effects manifest in poor physical performance that can be captured with a simple measurement of gait speed. The use of gait speed not only provides a marker of physical performance but also represents a strong predictor of longevity. As such, we have presented gait speed as a surrogate endpoint that estimates the effect of lifestyle interventions on longevity. Importantly, there is now extensive evidence demonstrating that lifestyle interventions involving modification of dietary and exercise patterns are effective in producing clinically significant improvements in gait speed. While interventions emphasizing either modification of diet or exercise have beneficial effects on gait speed, the benefits are optimized with multicomponent interventions. Therefore, interventions involving both diet and exercise may hold the greatest potential for improving mobility and potentially increasing longevity in obese, older adults.


References
1. Studenski S,Perera S,Patel K,et al. Gait speed and survival in older adultsJournal of the American Medical AssociationYear: 20113051505821205966
2. Cesari M,Kritchevsky SB,Newman AB,et al. Added value of physical performance measures in predicting adverse health-related events: results from the health, aging and body composition studyJournal of the American Geriatrics SocietyYear: 200957225125919207142
3. Dumurgier J,Elbaz A,Ducimetiere P,et al. Slow walking speed and cardiovascular death in well functioning older adults: prospective cohort studyBritish Medical JournalYear: 200933917
4. Guralnik JM,Ferrucci L,Simonsick EM,Salive ME,Wallace RB. Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disabilityThe New England Journal of MedicineYear: 199533295565617838189
5. Cesari M. Role of gait speed in the assessment of older patientsJournal of the American Medical AssociationYear: 20113051939421205972
6. Flegal KM,Carroll MD,Ogden CL,Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008Journal of the American Medical AssociationYear: 2010303323524120071471
7. Harridge SDR,Young A. Skeletal musclePrinciples and Practices of Geriatric MedicineYear: 1998London, UKWiley898905
8. Baumgartner RN,Stauber PM,McHugh D,Koehler KM,Garry PJ. Cross-sectional age differences in body composition in persons 60+ years of ageJournals of Gerontology Series AYear: 1995506M307M316
9. Forbes GB. Longitudinal changes in adult fat-free mass: influence of body weightAmerican Journal of Clinical NutritionYear: 19997061025103110584047
10. Roubenoff R. Sarcopenic obesity: the confluence of two epidemicsObesity ResearchYear: 200412688788815229325
11. Buford TW,Anton SD,Judge AR,et al. Models of accelerated sarcopenia: critical pieces for solving the puzzle of age-related muscle atrophyAgeing Research ReviewsYear: 20109436938320438881
12. Evans WJ. Skeletal muscle loss: cachexia, sarcopenia, and inactivityAmerican Journal of Clinical NutritionYear: 2010914
13. Baumgartner RN. Body composition in healthy agingAnnals of the New York Academy of SciencesYear: 200090443744810865787
14. Blaum CS,Xue QL,Michelon E,Semba RD,Fried LP. The association between obesity and the frailty syndrome in older women: the Women’s Health and Aging StudiesJournal of the American Geriatrics SocietyYear: 200553692793415935013
15. Cesari M,Kritchevsky SB,Baumgartner RN,et al. Sarcopenia, obesity, and inflammation–results from the Trial of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibition and Novel Cardiovascular Risk Factors studyAmerican Journal of Clinical NutritionYear: 200582242843416087989
16. Finkelstein EA,Ruhm CJ,Kosa KM. Economic causes and consequences of obesityAnnual Review of Public HealthYear: 200526239257
17. Pleis JR,Schiller JS,Benson V. Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2000Vital and Health Statistics Series 10Year: 20032151132
18. Chaput JP,Tremblay A. Obesity and physical inactivity: the relevance of reconsidering the notion of sedentarinessObesity FactsYear: 20092424925420054231
19. Carlson SA,Fulton JE,Galuska DA,Kruger J,Lobelo F,Loustalot FV. Prevalence of self-reported physically active adults—United States, 2007Morbidity and Mortality Weekly ReportYear: 200857481297130019052527
20. Ko SU,Stenholm S,Ferrucci L. Characteristic gait patterns in older adults with obesity—results from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of AgingJournal of BiomechanicsYear: 20104361104111020080238
21. Messier SP,Loeser RF,Miller GD,et al. Exercise and dietary weight loss in overweight and obese older adults with knee osteoarthritis: the arthritis, diet, and activity promotion trialArthritis and RheumatismYear: 20045051501151015146420
22. Janssen I,Heymsfield SB,Ross R. Low relative skeletal muscle mass (sarcopenia) in older persons is associated with functional impairment and physical disabilityJournal of the American Geriatrics SocietyYear: 200250588989612028177
23. Estrada M,Kleppinger A,Judge JO,Walsh SJ,Kuchel GA. Functional impact of relative versus absolute sarcopenia in healthy older womenJournal of the American Geriatrics SocietyYear: 200755111712171917979895
24. Visser M,Harris TB,Langlois J,et al. Body fat and skeletal muscle mass in relation to physical disability in very old men and women of the Framingham heart studyJournals of Gerontology Series AYear: 1998533M214M221
25. Lauretani F,Russo CR,Bandinelli S,et al. Age-associated changes in skeletal muscles and their effect on mobility: an operational diagnosis of sarcopeniaJournal of Applied PhysiologyYear: 20039551851186014555665
26. Marcell TJ. Sarcopenia: causes, consequences, and preventionsJournals of Gerontology Series A Year: 20035810911916
27. Delmonico MJ,Harris TB,Visser M,et al. Longitudinal study of muscle strength, quality, and adipose tissue infiltrationAmerican Journal of Clinical NutritionYear: 20099061579158519864405
28. Newman AB,Kupelian V,Visser M,et al. Strength, but not muscle mass, is associated with mortality in the health, aging and body composition study cohortJournals of Gerontology Series AYear: 20066117277
29. Bouchard DR,Janssen I. Dynapenic-obesity and physical function in older adultsJournals of Gerontology Series AYear: 20106517177
30. Clark BC,Manini TM. Sarcopenia =/= dynapeniaJournals of Gerontology Series AYear: 2008638829834
31. Manini TM,Clark BC. Dynapenia and aging: an update Journal of Gerontology Series A. In press.
32. Goodpaster BH,Carlson CL,Visser M,et al. Attenuation of skeletal muscle and strength in the elderly: the health ABC studyJournal of Applied PhysiologyYear: 20019062157216511356778
33. Goodpaster BH,Park SW,Harris TB,et al. The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass, and quality in older adults: the Health, Aging and Body Composition StudyJournals of Gerontology Series AYear: 2006611010591064
34. Baumgartner RN,Wayne SJ,Waters DL,Janssen I,Gallagher D,Morley JE. Sarcopenic obesity predicts instrumental activities of daily living disability in the elderlyObesity ResearchYear: 200412121995200415687401
35. Zamboni M,Mazzali G,Fantin F,Rossi A,Di Francesco V. Sarcopenic obesity: a new category of obesity in the elderlyNutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular DiseasesYear: 2008185388395
36. Landers KA,Hunter GR,Wetzstein CJ,Bamman MM,Weinsier RL. The interrelationship among muscle mass, strength, and the ability to perform physical tasks of daily living in younger and older womenJournals of Gerontology Series AYear: 20015610B443B448
37. Bean JF,Kiely DK,Herman S,et al. The relationship between leg power and physical performance in mobility-limited older peopleJournal of the American Geriatrics SocietyYear: 200250346146711943041
38. Ettinger WH,Burns R,Messier SP,et al. A randomized trial comparing aerobic exercise and resistance exercise with a health education program in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: the Fitness Arthritis and Seniors Trial (FAST)Journal of the American Medical AssociationYear: 1997277125318980206
39. Verbrugge LM,Gates DM,Ike RW. Risk factors for disability among U.S. adults with arthritisJournal of Clinical EpidemiologyYear: 19914421671821825325
40. Marks R. Obesity profiles with knee osteoarthritis: correlation with pain, disability, disease progressionObesityYear: 20071571867187417636106
41. Lamb SE,Guralnik JM,Buchner DM,et al. Factors that modify the association between knee pain and mobility limitation in older women: the women’s health and aging studyAnnals of the Rheumatic DiseasesYear: 200059533133710784513
42. Powell A,Teichtahl AJ,Wluka AE,Cicuttini FM. Obesity: a preventable risk factor for large joint osteoarthritis which may act through biomechanical factorsBritish Journal of Sports MedicineYear: 20053914515618330
43. Kim TN,Park MS,Yang SJ,et al. Prevalence and determinant factors of sarcopenia in patients with type 2 diabetes: the Korean Sarcopenic Obesity Study (KSOS)Diabetes CareYear: 20103371497149920413515
44. Raj IS,Bird SR,Shield AJ. Aging and the force-velocity relationship of musclesExperimental GerontologyYear: 2010452819019883746
45. Fiatarone MA,O’Neill EF,Ryan ND,et al. Exercise training and nutritional supplementation for physical frailty in very elderly peopleThe New England Journal of MedicineYear: 199433025176917758190152
46. Fielding RA,LeBrasseur NK,Cuoco A,Bean J,Mizer K,Fiatarone Singh MA. High-velocity resistance training increases skeletal muscle peak power in older womenJournal of the American Geriatrics SocietyYear: 200250465566211982665
47. Frontera WR,Meredith CN,O’Reilly KP,Knuttgen HG,Evans WJ. Strength conditioning in older men: skeletal muscle hypertrophy and improved functionJournal of Applied PhysiologyYear: 1988643103810443366726
48. Hagerman FC,Walsh SJ,Staron RS,et al. Effects of high-intensity resistance training on untrained older men. I. Strength, cardiovascular, and metabolic responsesJournals of Gerontology Series AYear: 2000557B336B346
49. Votruba SB,Horvitz MA,Schoeller DA. The role of exercise in the treatment of obesityNutritionYear: 200016317918810705072
50. Messier SP,Legault C,Loeser RF,et al. Does high weight loss in older adults with knee osteoarthritis affect bone-on-bone joint loads and muscle forces during walkingOsteoarthritis and CartilageYear: 20111927228021134477
51. Fontana L,Klein S. Aging, adiposity, and calorie restrictionJournal of the American Medical AssociationYear: 2007297998699417341713
52. Racette SB,Weiss EP,Villareal DT,et al. One year of caloric restriction in humans: feasibility and effects on body composition and abdominal adipose tissueJournals of Gerontology Series AYear: 2006619943950
53. Heilbronn LK,De Jonge L,Frisard MI,et al. Effect of 6-month calorie restriction on biomarkers of longevity, metabolic adaptation, and oxidative stress in overweight individuals: a randomized controlled trialJournal of the American Medical AssociationYear: 2006295131539154816595757
54. Avila JJ,Gutierres JA,Sheehy ME,Lofgren IE,Delmonico MJ. Effect of moderate intensity resistance training during weight loss on body composition and physical performance in overweight older adultsEuropean Journal of Applied PhysiologyYear: 2010109351752520169360
55. Villareal DT,Chode S,Parimi N,et al. Weight loss, exercise, or both and physical function in obese older adultsThe New England Journal of MedicineYear: 2011364131218122921449785
56. He XZ,Baker DW. Body mass index, physical activity, and the risk of decline in overall health and physical functioning in late middle ageAmerican Journal of Public HealthYear: 20049491567157315333316
57. Hillsdon MM,Brunner EJ,Guralnik JM,Marmot MG. Prospective study of physical activity and physical function in early old ageAmerican Journal of Preventive MedicineYear: 200528324525015766611
58. Manini T,Marko M,VanArnam T,et al. Efficacy of resistance and task-specific exercise in older adults who modify tasks of everyday lifeJournals of Gerontology Series AYear: 2007626616623
59. Vincent KR,Braith RW,Feldman RA,Kallas HE,Lowenthal DT. Improved cardiorespiratory endurance following 6 months of resistance exercise in elderly men and womenArchives of Internal MedicineYear: 2002162667367811911721
60. Brown M,Holloszy JO. Effects of walking, jogging and cycling on strength, flexibility, speed and balance in 60- to 72-year oldsAgingYear: 1993564274348161574
61. Charette SL,McEvoy L,Pyka G,et al. Muscle hypertrophy response to resistance training in older womenJournal of Applied PhysiologyYear: 1991705191219161864770
62. Fiatarone MA,Marks EC,Ryan ND,Meredith CN,Lipsitz LA,Evans WJ. High-intensity strength training in nonagenarians. Effects on skeletal muscleJournal of the American Medical AssociationYear: 199026322302930342342214
63. Ferri A,Scaglioni G,Pousson M,Capodaglio P,Van Hoecke J,Narici MV. Strength and power changes of the human plantar flexors and knee extensors in response to resistance training in old ageActa Physiologica ScandinavicaYear: 20031771697812492780
64. Newton RU,Häkkinen K,Häkkinen A,McCormick M,Volek J,Kraemer WJ. Mixed-methods resistance training increases power and strength of young and older menMedicine and Science in Sports and ExerciseYear: 20023481367137512165694
65. Bean JF,Kiely DK,Larose S,Goldstein R,Frontera WR,Leveille SG. Are changes in leg power responsible for clinically meaningful improvements in mobility in older adults?Journal of the American Geriatrics SocietyYear: 201058122363236821143443
66. Proctor DN,Sinning WE,Walro JM,Sieck GC,Lemon PWR. Oxidative capacity of human muscle fiber types: effects of age and training statusJournal of Applied PhysiologyYear: 1995786203320387665396
67. Davidson LE,Hudson R,Kilpatrick K,et al. Effects of exercise modality on insulin resistance and functional limitation in older adults: a randomized controlled trialArchives of Internal MedicineYear: 2009169212213119171808
68. Manini TM,Newman AB,Fielding R,et al. Effects of exercise on mobility in obese and nonobese older adultsObesityYear: 20101861168117519834467
69. Frimel TN,Sinacore DR,Villareal DT. Exercise attenuates the weight-loss-induced reduction in muscle mass in frail obese older adultsMedicine and Science in Sports and ExerciseYear: 20084071213121918580399
70. Chomentowski P,Dubé JJ,Amati F,et al. Moderate exercise attenuates the loss of skeletal muscle mass that occurs with intentional caloric restriction-induced weight loss in older, overweight to obese adultsJournals of Gerontology Series AYear: 2009645575580
71. Villareal DT,Banks M,Sinacore DR,Siener C,Klein S. Effect of weight loss and exercise on frailty in obese older adultsArchives of Internal MedicineYear: 2006166886086616636211
72. Anton SD,Manini TM,Milsom VA,et al. Effects of a weight loss plus exercise program on physical function in overweight, older women: a randomized controlled trialClinical Interventions in AgingYear: 2011614114921753869

Article Categories:
  • Review Article


Previous Document:  Progression of White Matter Lesion Volume and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Sympto...
Next Document:  Revisiting the role of neighbourhood change in social exclusion and inclusion of older people.