Document Detail


The highs and lows of theoretical interpretation in animal-metacognition research.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22492748     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Humans feel uncertain. They know when they do not know. These feelings and the responses to them ground the research literature on metacognition. It is a natural question whether animals share this cognitive capacity, and thus animal metacognition has become an influential research area within comparative psychology. Researchers have explored this question by testing many species using perception and memory paradigms. There is an emerging consensus that animals share functional parallels with humans' conscious metacognition. Of course, this research area poses difficult issues of scientific inference. How firmly should we hold the line in insisting that animals' performances are low-level and associative? How high should we set the bar for concluding that animals share metacognitive capacities with humans? This area offers a constructive case study for considering theoretical problems that often confront comparative psychologists. The authors present this case study and address diverse issues of scientific judgement and interpretation within comparative psychology.
Authors:
J David Smith; Justin J Couchman; Michael J Beran
Related Documents :
11449338 - Developing a novel antithrombotic in the academic environment.
22614738 - Kate bárány: a life of science, teaching, and service.
24569288 - Comparison of the inspector and rating protocol uncertainty influence in the condition ...
22886298 - Mechanosignaling pathways in cutaneous scarring.
15665618 - The 17th international irist congress proceedings.
2399478 - The incidence and prevalence of schizophrenia in the republic of ireland.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.; Review    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences     Volume:  367     ISSN:  1471-2970     ISO Abbreviation:  Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci.     Publication Date:  2012 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-04-11     Completed Date:  2012-09-04     Revised Date:  2013-06-26    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7503623     Medline TA:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1297-309     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Center for Cognitive Science, The University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260-4110, USA. psysmith@buffalo.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Animals
Cognition*
Humans
Macaca / psychology*
Memory*
Perception*
Psychology, Comparative / methods
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
1R01HD061455/HD/NICHD NIH HHS; R01 HD061455/HD/NICHD NIH HHS
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Kinds of access: different methods for report reveal different kinds of metacognitive access.
Next Document:  Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring.