Document Detail


The future of bioethics: three dogmas and a cup of hemlock.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20500759     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
In this paper I argue that bioethics is in crisis and that it will not have a future unless it begins to embrace a more Socratic approach to its leading assumptions. The absence of a critical and sceptical spirit has resulted in little more than a dominant ideology. I focus on three key issues. First, that too often bioethics collapses into medical ethics. Second, that medical ethics itself is beset by a lack of self-reflection that I characterize here as a commitment to three dogmas. Third, I offer a more positive perspective by suggesting how bioethics may benefit from looking towards public health ethics as a new source of inspiration and direction.
Authors:
Angus Dawson
Related Documents :
9358349 - Doctors' stories, patients' stories: a narrative approach to teaching medical ethics.
19948389 - 'maybe it would be better if you spoke to my mother?' - genetic counseling and personal...
17367619 - Dermatoethics: a curriculum in bioethics and professionalism for dermatology residents ...
16877129 - Ethics and the law in emergency medicine.
8589569 - Surrogacy: ethical, legal, and social aspects.
21715439 - Physicians' ethics forum: a web-based ethics consultation service.
18021119 - Assessment of the ethical review process in sudan.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Bioethics     Volume:  24     ISSN:  1467-8519     ISO Abbreviation:  Bioethics     Publication Date:  2010 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-05-26     Completed Date:  2010-09-23     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8704792     Medline TA:  Bioethics     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  218-25     Citation Subset:  E; IM    
Affiliation:
Centre for Professional Ethics, Staffordshire, Keele University, UK. a.j.dawson@keele.ac.uk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Bioethics / trends*
Dissent and Disputes
Ethics, Medical*
Forecasting
Humans
Moral Obligations
Personal Autonomy*
Philosophy*
Professional Autonomy
Professional-Patient Relations / ethics
Public Health* / ethics,  trends

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  The death of bioethics (as we once knew it).
Next Document:  How will the economic downturn affect academic bioethics?