Document Detail


The final steps in converting a health care organization to a latex-safe environment.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19435162     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: In a follow-up to a previous article, which described the approach at The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions to establishing a latex-safe environment, subsequent efforts to convert all the sterile gloves to nonlatex products and thereby complete the implementation of a latex-safe program are reported. Before the complete conversion to nonlatex sterile gloves, operating room use had increased to approximately one-third of our total sterile glove use during the preceding four years. NEW APPROACHES TO CONVERTING TO ALL NONLATEX STERILE GLOVES: The final stages of the conversion involved both consistent follow-through with education, training, and personnel involvement at all levels and a change in the culture of the medical facility. New and improved nonlatex glove products were coming to the market, and their costs were decreasing because of increased supply and competition. GLOVE TRIALS: Five synthetic neoprene or polyisoprene gloves-two from one manufacturer and three from the second manufacturer-were evaluated in glove trials. Overall, by manufacturer, a similar rate of acceptance among the various sterile nonlatex gloves (74.2% versus 78.1%) was found. However, to ensure that all users were satisfied, contracts were awarded to both vendors. The weekend before the conversion date of May 1, 2007, all old powdered sterile latex gloves were replaced with the new stock of nonlatex sterile gloves. THE CONVERSION PROCESS: Once financial and logistical concerns were addressed, conversion to a latex-safe environment entailed readying the organization for the change in organizational culture. Key factors were (1) general acceptance from all the chiefs of the surgical departments; (2) centralization for all purchases of medical supplies, including sterile gloves, through corporate purchasing; and (3) ongoing education and vigilance.
Authors:
Robert H Brown; Mary A McAllister; Ann-Michele Gundlach; Robert G Hamilton
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety / Joint Commission Resources     Volume:  35     ISSN:  1553-7250     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2009 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-05-13     Completed Date:  2009-06-18     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101238023     Medline TA:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  224-8     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA. rbrown@jhsph.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Gloves, Surgical / adverse effects,  standards*
Humans
Latex Hypersensitivity / prevention & control*
Multi-Institutional Systems / organization & administration,  standards*
Organizational Case Studies
Organizational Innovation*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Reducing hyperglycemia hospitalwide: the basal-bolus concept.
Next Document:  Legibility of a volumetric infusion pump in a shock trauma ICU.