Document Detail


The family approach to assessing fit in Rasch measurement.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19934529     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
There has been a renewed interest in comparing the usefulness of a variety of model and non-model based fit statistics to detect measurement disturbances. Most of the recent studies compare the results of individual statistics trying to find the single best statistic. Unfortunately, the nature of measurement disturbances is such that they are quite varied in how they manifest themselves in the data. That is to say, there is not a single fit statistic that is optimal for detecting every type of measurement disturbance. Because of this, it is necessary to use a family of fit statistics designed to detect the most important measurement disturbances when checking the fit of data to the appropriate Rasch model. The early Rasch fit statistics (Wright and Panchapakasen, 1969) were based on the Pearsonian chi square. The ability to recombine the NxL chi squares into a variety of different fit statistics, each looking at specific threats to the measurement process, is critical to this family approach to assessing fit. Calibration programs, such as WINSTEPS and FACETS, that use only one type of fit statistic to assess the fit of the data to the model, seriously underestimate the presence of measurement disturbances in the data. This is due primarily to the fact that the total fit statistics (INFIT and OUTFIT), used exclusively in these programs, are relatively insensitive to systematic threats to unidimensionality. This paper, which focuses on the Rasch model and the Pearsonian chi-square approach to assessing fit, will review the different types or measurement disturbances and their underlying causes, and identify the types of fit statistics that must be used to detect these disturbances with maximum efficiency.
Authors:
Richard M Smith; Christie Plackner
Related Documents :
23017379 - A new approach to determine the accuracy of morphology-elasticity relationships in cont...
3963129 - Promise in nonparametrics.
9343589 - Analysis of fmri time-series revisited.
18543619 - Statistical analysis of multidimensional fuzzy set ordinations.
9644649 - Statistical science and quantitative understanding.
20384429 - Analytical methods to detect within-individual changes in discounting.
25372959 - Errata.
24837219 - Image based weighted center of proximity versus directly measured knee contact location...
24431999 - Nengo: a python tool for building large-scale functional brain models.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of applied measurement     Volume:  10     ISSN:  1529-7713     ISO Abbreviation:  J Appl Meas     Publication Date:  2009  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-11-25     Completed Date:  2010-01-28     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101084377     Medline TA:  J Appl Meas     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  424-37     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Data Recognition Corporation, MN 55311, USA, rsmith@datarecognitioncorp.com
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Bias (Epidemiology)*
Data Interpretation, Statistical*
Humans
Models, Statistical
Psychometrics / methods*,  statistics & numerical data

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  A comparative analysis of the ratings in performance assessment using generalizability theory and th...
Next Document:  Standard setting with dichotomous and constructed response items: some rasch model approaches.