Document Detail


The ethics of basing community prevention in general practice.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20211991     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
In this paper we argue that the responsibility for systematic community-based preventive medicine should not be made part of the role of the general practitioner (GP). Preventive medicine cannot be shown to be more effective than curative or supportive medicine. Therefore, the allocation of the large amount of general practice staff time and resources required for systematic preventive medicine should not come at the expense of the care of the sick and the suffering. The traditional healing role of the GP requires a cooperative patient-centred approach, whereas systematic preventive medicine is driven by rigid pre-set protocols and is intrinsically paternalistic. Trying to merge the two approaches is detrimental to the doctor-patient relationship. Furthermore, a number of potential pitfalls are identified that may be encountered in the implementation of preventive medicine programmes in general practice: interference with the course of the consultation; inadequate explanation and consent; distortion of practice priorities as reflected in quality indicators; temptation to record inaccurate data; conflict of interests where the doctor is rewarded for performance; patient blaming; exacerbation of the health gap. We suggest that a more justifiable strategy would be for GPs to identify patients at high risk and offer them specific preventive advice when the opportunity presents itself and at a time when the patient is likely to be most amenable to cooperate. Opportunistic health promotion offers higher expectations of benefit, as well as a more equitable allocation of the risks associated with preventive medicine, than a systematic community-based approach.
Authors:
Michael Weingarten; Andre Matalon
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of medical ethics     Volume:  36     ISSN:  1473-4257     ISO Abbreviation:  J Med Ethics     Publication Date:  2010 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-03-09     Completed Date:  2010-08-10     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7513619     Medline TA:  J Med Ethics     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  138-41     Citation Subset:  E; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Family Medicine, Rabin Medical Centre-Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva, Israel. weingml@post.tau.ac.il
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Attitude of Health Personnel
Community Health Services / organization & administration*
Family Practice / organization & administration*
Health Promotion / organization & administration*
Humans
Physician's Practice Patterns / organization & administration*
Preventive Medicine / organization & administration*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Evolution of hospital clinical ethics committees in Canada.
Next Document:  Understanding risk in living donor nephrectomy.