Document Detail

An epididymis-specific secretory protein HongrES1 critically regulates sperm capacitation and male fertility.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19116669     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Mammalian sperm capacitation is an essential prerequisite to fertilizion. Although progress had been made in understanding the physiology and biochemistry of capacitation, little is known about the potential roles of epididymal proteins during this process. Here we report that HongrES1, a new member of the SERPIN (serine proteinase inhibitor) family exclusively expressed in the rat cauda epididymis and up-regulated by androgen, is secreted into the lumen and covers the sperm head. Co-culture of caudal sperms with HongrES1 antibody in vitro resulted in a significant increase in the percentage of capacitated spermatozoa. Furthermore, the percentage of capacitated spermatozoa clearly increased in rats when HongrES1 was down-regulated by RNAi in vivo. Remarkably, knockdown of HongrES1 in vivo led to reduced fertility accompanied with deformed appearance of fetuses and pups. These results identify HongrES1 as a novel and critical molecule in the regulation of sperm capacitation and male fertility.
Yuchuan Zhou; Min Zheng; Qixian Shi; Li Zhang; Wei Zhen; Wenying Chen; Yonglian Zhang
Related Documents :
16750209 - Evaluation of reproductive potential after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of varied h...
6535459 - Selection of morphologically abnormal sperm by human cervical mucus.
8282759 - Calcium buffer injections inhibit cytokinesis in xenopus eggs.
18227549 - Male varicocele: transcatheter foam sclerotherapy with sodium tetradecyl sulfate--outco...
12801569 - Efficacy and pregnancy outcome of two methods of semen preparation for intrauterine ins...
8862739 - Selenium-vitamin e supplementation in infertile men. effects on semen parameters and mi...
17010419 - One year old fillies can be successfully used as embryo donors.
16727769 - Reproductive performance of synchronized beef cows as affected by inhibition of sucklin...
9542269 - Should we treat minor degrees of glucose intolerance in pregnancy?
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2008-12-31
Journal Detail:
Title:  PloS one     Volume:  3     ISSN:  1932-6203     ISO Abbreviation:  PLoS ONE     Publication Date:  2008  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2008-12-31     Completed Date:  2009-02-13     Revised Date:  2013-06-02    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101285081     Medline TA:  PLoS One     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  e4106     Citation Subset:  IM    
Shanghai Key Laboratory for Molecular Andrology, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Epididymis / metabolism*
Fertility* / genetics
RNA, Small Interfering / genetics
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Serpins / genetics*,  metabolism*
Sperm Capacitation / physiology*
Sperm Motility
Reg. No./Substance:
0/HongrES1 protein, rat; 0/RNA, Small Interfering; 0/Serpins

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): PLoS ONE
Journal ID (publisher-id): plos
Journal ID (pmc): plosone
ISSN: 1932-6203
Publisher: Public Library of Science, San Francisco, USA
Article Information
Download PDF
Zhou et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received Day: 29 Month: 9 Year: 2008
Accepted Day: 18 Month: 11 Year: 2008
collection publication date: Year: 2008
Electronic publication date: Day: 31 Month: 12 Year: 2008
Volume: 3 Issue: 12
E-location ID: e4106
ID: 2606034
PubMed Id: 19116669
Publisher Id: 08-PONE-RA-06629R1
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004106

An Epididymis-Specific Secretory Protein HongrES1 Critically Regulates Sperm Capacitation and Male Fertility Alternate Title:HongrES1 Regulates Fertility
Yuchuan Zhou1
Min Zheng1
Qixian Shi2
Li Zhang1
Wei Zhen1
Wenying Chen2
Yonglian Zhang13*
Dominik Hartledit1 Role: Editor
1Shanghai Key Laboratory for Molecular Andrology, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
2Unit of Reproductive Physiology, Zhejiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
3Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research, Shanghai, China
Yale University School of Medicine, United States of America
Correspondence: * E-mail:
Contributed by footnote: Conceived and designed the experiments: YZ YZ. Performed the experiments: YZ MZ QS LZ WZ WC. Analyzed the data: YZ QS YZ. Wrote the paper: YZ YZ.


Sperm maturation or fertilizing capacity are not intrinsic to sperm themselves but they are acquired during their transit through the epididymis after the testis [1]. The epididymis is composed of a long convoluted tube, three main regions are recognized for it, namely caput, corpus and cauda, and the epithelial cells of these specialized epididymal regions create a unique luminal fluid environment by secreting proteins and various fluid components [2]. In this unique and continuously-changing milieu, spermatozoa gradually acquire their forward motility and capacity for fertilization, and then they are stored in a quiescent state in the caudal epididymis. These fluids are particularly well suited to protect spermatozoa from different types of physiological and biochemical aggressions [3]. Although the role of the epididymis in sperm maturation has been well established four decades ago [1], only a few specific molecule of epididymal origin had been demonstrated to be linked to this maturation process [4].

In addition to the maturation in the epididymis, spermatozoa must subsequently undergo numerous membrane modifications before they interact correctly with the oocyte, all of these processes are collectively referred to as capacitation and normally take place within the female reproductive tract [5], [6]. Capacitated spermatozoa subsequently undergo the acrosome reaction (AR) which results in the release and activation of acrosomal enzymes. The sperm cell is then able to bind and penetrate the zona pellucida, and to fuses with the oocyte plasma membrane [7]?[9]. Capacitation comprises a series of processes, such as modifications in sperm surface protein distribution, alterations in plasma membrane characteristics, changes in enzymatic activities and modulation of intracellular constituents [10], [11]. Despite the fact that the phenomenon of capacitation has been discovered over half century ago [5], [12]?[14] and that much progress had been made in identifying sperm events involved in capacitation, few specific molecules of epididymal origin have been identified to be directly involved in this process in vivo. Previously, we reported a newly discovered rat epididymis caudal region specific gene named HongrES1 [15]. The current study reports that, with the aid of sensitive and specific polyclonal antisera against the mature HongrES1 protein, the role of this protein in sperm capacitation had been characterized. Furthermore, by using RNAi in vivo, gene expression knock down of HongrES1 in the rat provides solid evidence that HongrES1 is a novel and critical molecule in regulation of sperm capacitation and male fertility.

Native status and localization of the HongrES1 protein in the rat epididymis

We previously showed that HongrES1 cDNA contained 1590 bp nucleotides, with an open reading frame of 1245 bp nucleotides, encoding a 415 amino acid protein with a serine protease inhibitor conserved domain. Northern blot and in situ hybridization assays had indicated that HongrES1 mRNA was specifically expressed in the rat cauda epididymis and restricted to the epithelial cells [15]. To understand the native status and localization of this protein in the epididymis, polyclonal antisera against the recombinant HongrES1 mature peptide was raised successfully in rabbits. The sensitivity and specificity of the antisera were verified by western blot analysis. Figure 1A reveals that even 0.25 ng antigen can be detected by using this antiserum with a dilution of 1?10,000. Figure 1B shows a distinct single band in the protein extract from the cauda epididymis region but not in those from the caput and corpus, or from the testis. The same band was also found in protein extracts from sperm collected in the cauda epididymis, suggesting that this protein binds spermatozoa (Figure 1C). It was noticed that the size of the band (>50 kDa) was larger than that of the deduced one (45.1 kDa). To account for this difference, the HongrES1 sequence was analyzed using the Prosite software ( It was found that there are three N-glycosylation sites (N32, N152 and N380) in the amino acid sequence. After de-glycosylation of the tissue protein extracts by N-glycosidase digestion, a decrease in molecular mass of the HongrES1 band was detected by western analysis (Figure 1D). This result suggests that native HongrES1 protein was glycosylated. Immunohistochemistry assay confirmed that the positive signal was localized to the cauda epididymis and was present also in lumen (Figure 1E, 1F and 1G) and that it was confined to the epithelial cells (green in Figure 1H) but not the clear cells (red in Figure 1H). Indirect immunofluorescence assay further validated that the HongrES1 protein is secreted into the lumen of the cauda epididymis and is bound to sperm (Figure 1I). Figure 1J shows that the protein (green) covered the entire sperm head.

HongrES1 expression is androgen-dependent and developmentally regulated

Since the epididymis is an androgen-responsive organ [16], the effects of androgen manipulation on HongrES1 mRNA expression were investigated in the castrated rat by northern blot analysis (Figure 2A). In castrated animals, serum testosterone declined rapidly and was almost undetectable from the first day. A clear decrease was found in the HongrES1 mRNA level on the third day post-castration and it was nearly undetectable by day 7 after surgery. Testosterone replacement for the animals 7 days after castration resulted in a rapid increase in the serum testosterone concentration and the HongrES1 mRNA level in the epididymis (Figure 2B). This result indicates that HongrES1 mRNA expression was up-regulated by androgen in vivo. The developmental changes of HongrES1 expression at both mRNA and protein levels throughout the life-span of rats were surveyed by northern blot and western blot analysis (Figure 2C, 2D and 2E). Its expression was detected at day 30 and the high levels were maintained in the aged animals.

HongrES1 protein is involved in sperm capacitation in vitro

Based on these results, we developed the following hypothesis. As a proteinase inhibitor covering the entire matured sperm head before ejaculation, HongrES1 might protect the sperm head surface proteins from attacked by proteinases in the down-stream tissues or HongrES1 might control the activity of some proteinases on the spermatozoa after ejaculation. An early event confronted by the sperm ejaculated from epididymis is the seminal fluid which contains of various components including a number of proteases [17]. The second event might be undergoing the capacitation and the acrosome reaction in the female tract.

Since rat semen is not easily collected, we concentrated on the possible role on sperm capacitation and the acrosome reaction by examining changes in vitro. Capacitation can be readily mimicked in vitro by incubation in a chemically defined medium [18]?[21]. This process results in a loss or migration of some proteins on the sperm surface [22]?[24]. In vitro sperm capacitation and the acrosome reaction can be assessed by chlortetracycline (CTC) staining. CTC is a fluorescent antibiotic whose distribution on the sperm changes during the transition from the non-capacitated to the capacitated state and then to the acrosome-reacted state [25], [26], as shown in Figures 3A, 3B and 3C. We therefore followed changes in the sperm binding patterns of HongrES1 protein during capacitation and the acrosome reaction. When cauda epididymal spermatozoa that are bound by HongrES1 were incubated in capacitation medium, the binding immunofluorescence signal attenuated gradually and disappeared (Figure 3D, 3E and 3F). This strongly suggests that changes in HongrES1 protein binding are involved in sperm capacitation and/or the acrosome reaction in vitro. To examine the possible role of HongrES1 during capacitation and the acrosome reaction, the polyclonal antisera were used in this in vitro system. To rule out non-specific interferences, preimmune serum and rabbit polyclonal antisera against RNase9 protein specifically expressed in the caput and corpus of rat epididymis and having no binding activity in the cauda epididymis sperm were used as controls [27]. Figure 3G indicates that none of the treatments (i.e. additions of preimmune serum or specific antisera) affected sperm motility. None of the control sera had any effect on spermatozoa; only spermatozoa treated with HongrES1 antisera revealed significantly changes with the percentage of uncapacitated spermatozoa (F form) significantly decreasing at 1 h, 3 h and 5 h (Figure 3H), and that of the capacitated patterns (B pattern) markedly increasing at the same time points (Figure 3I). The percentage of acrosome reacted spermatozoa (AR pattern) showed no changes (Figure 3J). These results indicate that inhibition of HongrES1 action lead spermatozoa to become more responsive in vitro capacitation and the acrosome reaction system suggesting a possible role for this protein. Since the in vitro system may not entirely reflect changes in vivo we sought to confirm the role of HongrES1 protein in rat sperm capacitation in vivo.

HongrES1 inhibits sperm capacitation in vivo

Gene targeting is a convenient strategy for functional studies, however, gene knock out is not yet practical in rats, so RNAi would be a useful choice. The use of RNAi to knock down gene expression transiently in cell lines has revealed considerable success. Nevertheless, there are still several problems that need to be resolved for gene knockdown in vivo, such as delivery system, how to reach the target cell, or an increase the transferring efficiency [28]. Therefore, only a few successful experiments have been reported but there are few studies for gene function in tissues with blood barriers such as testis or brain [29], [30]. Although the epididymis is a typical blood barrier tissue, the fact that this organ resides outside of the body makes it convenient for local injection procedures. Thus, we decided to use RNAi approach to knock down HongrES1 gene expression in rat epididymis. According to the RNAi mechanism-based rules [31], [32], two siRNAs (Hsi1 and Hsi2) targeting the different sites of HongrES1 gene and a non-silencing siRNA (Csi) as scrambled control were designed and synthesized. Each siRNA with HongrES1 complementary DNA was co-transfected into the mouse epididymal epithelial cell line (PC1), which had no endogenous HongrES1 expression. Figure 4A shows that both siRNAs could inhibit HongrES1 expression almost completely at the mRNA and protein levels at 48 h after transfection. Thus, each effective siRNA was locally injected into the rat cauda epididymis and using in vivo electroporation to improve its transferring efficiency. As shown in Figure 4B, HongES1 gene expression at mRNA and protein levels in the rat epididymis was suppressed by about 50% after 48 h by siRNAs injection as compared with the scrambled siRNA control. Although the injected synthetic siRNAs will be metabolized gradually in the body, this inhibition could still be maintained until 72 h after treatment (data not shown). As expected, the number of spermatozoa bound with HongrES1 protein in the RNAi-treated rats decreased down to about 60% of the scrambled control as shown in Figures 4C and 4D. The reduction in sperm binding led to the significant decrease of uncapacitated patterns and increase of capacitated patterns (Figure 4F and 4G). There were no statistically significant differences in sperm motility and the acrosome reaction observed between treated and control groups (Figure 4E and 4H). The results were identical to those observed in experiments where spermatozoa were treated with HongrES1 antisera. It has been shown that capacitation is characterized by a spontaneous, time-dependent increase of tyrosine and serine/threonine phosphorylation of different proteins [33]?[35], so tyrosine phosphorylation of sperm proteins could be an indicator of whether the capacitation signaling cascade has been activated [36]. Western blot analysis shows that tyrosine phosphorylation of sperm proteins was accelerated when HongrES1 expression was down-regulated by RNAi (Figure 4I). This is consistent with the observations with CTC staining. These in vivo results further directly verified that HongrES1 is a novel molecule of the epididymis origin for the inhibition of sperm capacitation.

The phenotype of HongrES1 gene knock-down rats

It is widely accepted that sperm capacitation is a prerequisite for the acrosome reaction and fertilization. We were therefore keen to examine the fertilizing capacity of spermatozoa from rats in which HongrES1 gene expression was knocked down and evaluate the effect of accelerated capacitation that takes place when the apparent inhibitory action of this protein was blocked. After mating, the number of live offspring had a considerable reduction in the litters from receptive female rats that mated with specific siRNA-treated male rats, compared to scrambled-treated control (Figure 5A and Figure 5B open circles). There were some dead (Figure 5C black arrow head) and small-sized pups (Figure 5C red arrow head) in these litters. Table 1 gives the frequency of abnormalities in the litters. To explore embryo development further, implantation of blastocysts in the uterus of pregnant rats was examined. Similar results were found (Figure 5B; filled triangles); i.e., the number of implantated embryos decreased in the group with siRNAs treatment. Noticeably, the decrease was less than that noted when offspring were analyzed. Figure 5D shows an example of implantation in the two groups. There were 19 embryos implanted in the female uterus mated with scrambled siRNA-treated male rat. However, only 15 embryos implanted in the uterus of a female mated with a HongES1 gene knocked down rat sperm. This may be due to abnormalities in sperm-egg interaction or implantation. Moreover, 4 of 15 fetuses appeared to be regressing indicating fetus development failure (Figure 5D black arrow head). Future studies on fetus development should address causes for abnormal development (i.e., reduction in size) and death of offspring. Our in vivo studies further confirm that HongrES1 seem to protect sperm against becoming capacitated before fertilization. An alteration in the timing of capacitation appears to be the cause for fertility reduction and the occurrence of small-sized and dead offspring. This suggests that the usual markers for capacitation, such as CTC staining and protein tyrosine phosphorylation, are insufficient to evaluate the acquisition of a correct capacitation state.


Capacitation represents the completion of sperm maturation that confers on mammalian sperm the acquisition of fertilization-competence either in vivo or in vitro. Capacitation is associated with changes in sperm intracellular ion concentrations, plasma membrane fluidity, changes in metabolism, tyrosine phosphorylation of multiple proteins, and acquisition of a different motility pattern [11], [37]. Although these changes have been known for many years, the molecular basis underlying these events still remains enigmatic. In particular, it is not clear which of the proteins in the epididymis is obligatory for capacitation. The rat epididymis secretary protein, Crisp-1 is the only one reported so far which has a capacitation inhibitory activity in vitro [36]. Here, we provide direct evidence in vivo that HongrES1, a new member of the SERPIN family and specifically expressing in the principal cells of the cauda epididymis, is involved in sperm capacitation. Our results suggest a clear role for HongrES1 protein, spermatozoa would bind HongrES1 on their heads and this protein would act by timing capacitation to take place in the right time and place.

The precisely regulation of capacitation is critical for the normal fertility. Once spermatozoa are capacitated and receive the proper signals or stimuli, they undergo the acrosome reaction rather promptly. On the other hand, the acrosome reacted- spermatozoa survive not long enough and subsequently reduced the ability of fertilization [38]. In vitro capacitation showed that the number of capacitated sperm from subfertile bulls significantly increased compared to fertile bulls at the same timepoint of incubation. These capacitated sperm were able to undergo the acrosome reaction, and subsequent the acrosome reacted-spermatozoa dead doubled [39]. This indicates that prematurely capacitated sperm might result in their premature acrosome reaction and death, whereas, acrosome-reacted cells are no longer able to fertilize, if these phenomena occurs in vivo, it might lead to the decline of fertility. It had been reported that the degree of DNA damage is clearly correlated with the impairment of embryo development and severe DNA damage cause male infertility [40]. Moreover, sperm capacitation could alter the chromatin stability, enhance remodeling asynchrony and result in delayed pronuclei formation and DNA synthesis [41], [42]. Our in vivo results showed that the prematurely capacitated sperm stemmed from knockdown of HongrES1 led to the reduction in fertility and somehow deformed appearance of fetuses and pups. These suggested that HongrES1 play a vital role in elaborate regulation of sperm capacitation.

Under normal conditions, sperm capacitation take place in the female genital tract, however, the process can be mimicked in vitro by incubating epididymal or ejaculated sperm in a defined medium [18]?[21], and a protein source that usually is bovine serum albumin (BSA) which approximates that of oviduct fluid is essential for sperm capacitation [43]. The primary action of BSA is to serve as a sink for the removal of cholestero from sperm plasma membrane [44]. Cholesterol efflux led to changes in the fluidity of the plasma membrane and a subsequent increase in the permeability of the sperm to Ca2+ and HCO3?, the resultant increases in the levels of intracellular Ca2+ and HCO3? would ultimately stimulate the activity of the sperm adenylyl cyclase, leading to an increase in cAMP and an increase in protein tyrosine phosphorylation. Increase in protein tyrosine phosphorylation is considered to be an indicator that spermatozoa are undergoing capacitation [36], [45]. In our experiment, BSA in the incubation medium is required for normal sperm capacitation and the accelerated sperm capacitation (Figure 6A). Figure 6B showed that knockdown of HongrES1 accelerate the membrane fluidity of sperm treated with BSA and enlarge the action of BSA, this might be the reason why protein tyrosine phosphorylation was accelerated in sperm of HongrES1 knockdown. Sperm capacitation in the female reproductive tract is likely modulated by environmental cues in the luminal fluid, as well as by interactions with oviductal epithelium or other female tissues [46]. Sperm membrane cholesterol efflux might be a result from this interaction, although the identity of such acceptors remains to be clarified. Thus, the membrane fluidity of HongrES1 knockdown sperm may be enlarged and lead to imprecise sperm capacitation in the female reproductive tract, this might result in reduced fertility and deformed appearance of fetuses and pups. At present, it is unknown whether other gene(s) is involved in the process, we need to be excluded.

In HongrES1 gene knocked down male rats, there were mainly three types of spermatozoa, as shown in Figure 4C, i.e. sperm head fully, partially and not totally covered by HongrES1 protein. These differences may be associated to multiple phenotypes such as the decrease in offspring and blastcysts implantation number, the appearance of dead or small-sized offspring and the regressing implanted embryo. It is difficult to isolate spermatozoa either partially- or incomplete-bound HongrES1 to investigate their individual roles in fertilization. Therefore, our future work will concentrate on the generation of HongrES1 conditional knock out mice to reveal the phenotype of pure no HongrES1-binding spermatozoa. In any case, successful knock-down of about 50% of gene expression in the blood-epididymis barrier tissue in vivo, as revealed in this study, will not only lead to studies addressing functions of other genes in tissues with blood barriers such as the epididymis, testis, and brain, but it will also allow for the generation of HongrES1 partially- and incomplete-bound sperm models for a better understanding of events related to capacitation and its timing.

In terms of translational studies, in addition to the evaluation of capacitation, these results are important for the diagnosis of male infertility. Any small molecule to be found repressing expression or inhibiting its binding with spermatozoa could also be developed as a new male contraceptive. Furthermore, if the HongrES1 antibody can be assembled as a capsule to be placed in the vagina before sexual intercourse to mask the HongrES1 sperm binding activity, it might be serve as an emergency contraceptive.

Other questions arise relate to whether HongrES1, like other member of the SERPIN family, have serine proteinase inhibitor activity and why does the epididymis need such a specific proteinase inhibitor. Are there some proteinases specifically expressed in the reproductive tract that serve as its substrates? Moreover, what kind of small molecules can depress its expression or inhibit its binding with sperm? To address these questions, active HongrES1 recombinant protein expression will be a key step in further studies.

Preparation of antibody and immunoblot of HongrES1

An 1161-base-pair cDNA fragment of HongrES1 corresponding the mature HongrES1 peptide of 387 (from 29 aa to the end) amino acids was inserted into a modified PET-28(a) vector (Invitrogen). The recombinant protein was expressed and purified by using a Novagen pET Expression Systems kit (Invitrogen). The polyclonal antisera against HongrES1 were obtained according to our modified immunization methods [47]. Western analysis, immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence staining of tissues, and indirect immunofluorescence detection of protein associated with spermatozoa were conducted following a previously described protocol [27]. Briefly, protein extracts of the epididymal caput, corpus and cauda and spermatozoa from each section were resolved over 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels, transferred into nitrocellulose membranes, probed with rabbit polyclonal antisera against HongrES1 (1?10000), the bound IgG was detected with goat anti-rabbit-HRP (Calbiochem, Germany) (1?10000) and developed using ECL+Plus (Amersham). Protein loading was assayed by probing blots with monoclonal antibody against GAPDH (KangChen Biotech, China) and ?-actin (Sigma). Peptide N-Glycosidase F (PNGase-F) (BioLabs, New England) (500 units/?l) was added to the protein extract of the cauda epididymis and the digestion reaction was allowed to proceed at 37?C overnight. N-glycosylation modification of rat HongrES1 was further examined by western blotting. For tissue immunohistochemistry, ABC kit (Sino-American Biotechnology Company) was used for the detection of staining signals according to the manufacturer's instruction. For immunofluorescence, the 1?800 diluted anti-antisera against HongrES1 and chicken anti-ATP6E IgY antibody (Genway Biotech Inc, San Diego, CA) (dilution 1?400) were applied, the second antibodies were respectively fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma, USA) (dilution 1?500) and Rhodamine-conjugated bovine anti-chicken IgY (Santa Cruz) (dilution 1?200). Sperm were washed out from epididymal caput, corpus and cauda, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, and immunostained with the polyclonal antisera against HongrES1 (1?700) and FITC-labeled anti-rabbit IgG (dilution 1?500). All pictures were taken using a BX51 fluorescence microscope (Olympus) or a confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP2 AOBS).

Assay for regulation and developmental change of HongrES1

Castration and androgen replacement were conducted following a previously described protocol [27]. Namely, one hundred and twenty day-old normal male Sprague-Dawley rats were castrated bilaterally under sodium pentobarbital anesthesia. Animals were sacrificed on days 0, 1, 3, 5 and 7 after castration as well as 1, 3, 5 and 7 days after the initial testosterone propionate injection. The epididymides were excised and used for RNA extraction. Androgen supplementation began on the seventh day after castration, and rats were injected with testosterone propionate (3 mg/kg body weight) every 2 days. Pooled serum samples for each group were sent to the Shanghai Zhong-Shan Hospital for the measurement of testosterone concentration by RIA. The expression profile of HongrES1 in the rat epididymis during the whole life-span was monitored as previously described procedure [27], [48], the epdidymides of normal male Sprague-Dawley rats were sampled at the age of 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 270, 360, 450 and 720 days. The tissues from the different developmental stages were measured by Northern blotting and Western blotting.

Cell culture and siRNAs transfection

Two siRNAs (Hsi1 and Hsi2) targeting HongrES1 sequence and non-silencing siRNA (Csi) for scrambled control were synthesized by Shanghai GeneChem Inc (Shanghai, China). The sense strands of siRNAs are: Hsi1 (sequence 1), beginning at nt308, [gene: 5?-CAGGAGCCUUGGAUACUAAdTdT-3?] (sense), Hsi2 (sequence 2), beginning at nt356, [gene: 5?-GUAACCUGCUACAUACUAAdTdT-3?] (sense), Csi, [gene: 5?-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUdTdT-3?] (sense). PC1 cell lines from proximal caput of mouse epididymis (kindly provided by Dr. Orgebin-Crist) were cultured in a plastic culture plate in the supplemented IMDM containing 10% FCS at 33?C as described elsewhere[49]. The recombinant vector expressing HongrES1 was constructed by cloning HongrES1 open reading fragment into pcDNA3.1 vector, then this expression vector and siRNA (mass ratio?=?20?1) were co-transfected into PC1 cells by Lipofectamine according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The knock down efficiency was determined by northern blotting and western blotting of extracts from transfected cultures at 48 h after transfection.

In vivo siRNA treatment by electroporation

The skin covering the testis and epididymis of a male Sprague-Dawley rat (400?450 g) was cut open under anesthesia, the cauda epididymis was gently squeezed out and fastened with tweezers, and 40 ?l of Hsi1, Hsi2 or Csi in PBS solution (75 ?g/ml) were injected into the interstitial space of cauda epididymis. Following the injection, in vivo electroporation was used according to the modification of described elsewhere [50]. Briefly, the cauda was grasped between the plates (10 mm diameter) of a pair of tweezertrodes (BTX, San Diego, CA), and 8?50-msec pulses of 50 V were delivered to the tissue using an Electro Square Porator ECM 830 (BTX). This process was repeated in the reverse direction, and the skin was then sutured. The total RNA and protein of cauda epididymis and spermatozoa were collected for assessment 48 h after injection. The animal experiments in this project were conducted according to a protocol approved by the Institute Animal Care Committee. The protocol conforms to internationally accepted guidelines for the humane care and use of laboratory animals.

Sperm motility analysis

Suspensions of spermatozoa were loaded into flat 100 ?m deep microslides (HTR1099, VitroCom Inc., Mt. Lks. N.J., USA) for CASA analysis using HTM-TOXIVOS sperm motility analyzer (Rat Head Toxicology, version 12.3A, Hamilton-Thorn Research, MA, USA). Instrument settings were: temperature, 37?C; objective, ?4; minimum cell size, two pixels; minimum contrast, 80; minimum static contrast, 25; low VAP cut-off, 20.0; low VSL cut-off, 30.0; threshold straightness, 50%; static head size, 0.72?8.82; static head intensity, 0.14?1.84; magnification, 0.80. Thirty frames were acquired at a frame rate of 60 Hz. During analysis, the playback feature was used to check its accuracy.

Flow cytometry analysis

The percentage of rat sperm with HongrES1 knockdown was analyzed on a flow cytometer (BD-FACScalibur) as described procedure [4]. Sperm were stained with HongrES1 polyclonal antibody at a final concentration of 1?300, and the secondary antibody, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated goat antibody against rabbit IgG (Zymed Laboratories) used at a dilution of 1?100. We analyzed at least 10,000 individual sperm per sample for FITC fluorescence emissions.

Evaluation of sperm capacitation

For the assessment of capacitation, sperm from the cauda epididymis were released into the capacitation medium (94.6 mM NaCl, 25 mM KCl, 1.71 mM CaCl2, 1.19 mM MgSO4, 1.19 mM KH2PO4, 25 mM NaHCO3, 5.56 mM glucose, 10.76 mM sodium lactate and 0.5 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.002% phenol red, 4 mg/ml bovine serum albumin; 50 ?g/ml streptomycin sulphate, 75 ?g/ml potassium penicillin, pH 7.4, osmolarity about 310 mOsmol/kg). The time-point of spermatozoa dilution was defined as the beginning of capacitation (0 h). Staining with CTC and assess for sperm capacitation and the acrosome reaction were carried out as described elsewhere [26], [51]. After CTC staining and fixation, samples were examined by using BX51 fluorescence microscopy (Olympus) with a ?10 ocular and ?100 objective (oil). The UV light passed through a band-pass filter of 400?440 nm with a relector of 475 nm. In each sample, at least 300 cells were assessed. The tyrosine phosphorylation proteins from spermatozoa were detected by using western blotting. The sperm pellet was suspended in SDS sample buffer, and total sperm protein was performed on PAGE with 8% Tris-glycine gels for western blotting, ?-tubulin was used as internal control.

Sperm membrane fluidity analysis

Cauda sperm from siRNA-treated rats were prepared for membrane fluidity assay using a slight modification of the previously described protocol [52], sperm were released into the capacitation medium containing 25 nM Yo-Pro-1 without BSA. For analysis in the presence of BSA, the collected sperm were diluted in capacitation medium with 2?BSA (8 mg/ml bovine serum albumin). The merocyanine at a final concentration of 1.35 ?M was supplemented to sperm suspension; the subsample was then analyzed directly on the flow cytometer (BD-FACScalibur) about 90 sec after addition of merocyanine. The fluorescence of Yo-Pro-1 was detected by the FL1 detector using a 530/30-nm ?band-pass? filter, while the influorescence of merocyanine was detected in the FL2 detector using a 620-nm ?long-pass? filter. For individual samples, data were collected from 20,000 events per sample.

Fertility assay

The male rat at 48 h after treatment with siRNA was mated with normal female rats; they were maintained together overnight, vaginal smears of the females were taken in the following morning and examined microscopy; the mated male rat was sampled for determining the knockdown efficiency. The female rats were successfully mated if spermatozoa were present, and then female rats were housed individually. The pregnant females at 18 days were subjected to hysterectomy to determine the number of embryos or fetuses. After birth, the number, viability and the size of offspring in a litter were observed.


Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This research was supported by following grants: The 973 program (2006CB504002 and 2006CB944002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30400072), Chinese Post Doctoral Science Foundation (2005037519), Shanghai Science and Technology funding (06JC14075), the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Knowledge Creative Program (KSCX1-YW-R-54).

We thank Drs. Eduardo R. S. Roldan and Dr. Susan H. Hall for polishing the writting, and Dr. Dangsheng Li for critical reading of the manuscript. We are also grateful to Dr. Yuqiang Ding for providing the electroporation machine (Electro Square Porator ECM 830) and giving some advice for in vivo electroporation, and Aihua Liu for technical assistance in examining vaginal smears of female rats.

1. Orgebin-Christ MC. 1967;Sperm maturation in rabbit epididymis.Nature 216:816–818. [pmid: 6074957]
2. Syntin P,Dacheux F,Druart X,Gatti JL,Okamura N,et al. 1996;Characterization and identification of proteins secreted in the various regions of the adult boar epididymis.Biol Reprod 55:956–974. [pmid: 8902205]
3. Hinton BT,Palladino MA,Rudolph D,Labus JC. 1995;The epididymis as protector of maturing spermatozoa.Reprod Fertil Dev 7:731–745. [pmid: 8711210]
4. Zhou CX,Zhang YL,Xiao LQ,Zheng M,Leung KM,et al. 2004;An epididymis-specific ?-defensin is important for the initiation of sperm maturation.Nat Cell Biol 6:458–464. [pmid: 15122269]
5. Austin CR. 1952;The capacitation of the mammalian sperm.Nature 170:326. [pmid: 12993150]
6. Suarez SS,Pacey AA. 2006;Sperm transport in the female reproductive tract.Hum Reprod Update 12:23–37. [pmid: 16272225]
7. De Lamirande E,Leclerc P,Gagnon C. 1997;Capacitation as a regulatory event that primes spermatozoa for the acrosome reaction and fertilization.Mol Hum Reprod 3:175–194. [pmid: 9237244]
8. Wassarman PM. 1999;Mammalian fertilization: molecular aspects of gamete adhesion, exocytosis, and fusion.Cell 96:175–183. [pmid: 9988213]
9. Wassarman PM,Jovine L,Litscher ES. 2001;A profile of fertilization in mammals.Nat Cell Biol 3:E59–E64. [pmid: 11175768]
10. Tulsiani DR,Abou-Haila A. 2004;Is sperm capacitation analogous to early phases of Ca2+-triggered membrane fusion in somatic cells and viruses?BioEssays 26:281–290. [pmid: 14988929]
11. Brewis IA,Moore HD,Fraser LR,Holt WV,Baldi E,et al. 2005;Molecular mechanisms during sperm capacitation.Hum Fertil 8:253–261.
12. Austin CR. 1951;Observations on the penetration of the sperm into the mammalian egg.Aust J Sci Res 4:581–596.
13. Chang MC. 1951;Fertilizing capacity of spermatozoa deposited into the fallopian tubes.Nature 168:997–998. [pmid: 14910623]
14. Chang MC. 1955;Development of fertilizing capacity of rabbit spermatozoa in the uterus.Nature 175:1036–1037. [pmid: 14394098]
15. Hu ZH,Liu Q,Shang Q,Zheng M,Yang J,et al. 2002;Identification and characterization of a new member of serpin family-HongrES1 in rat epididymis.Cell Res 12:407–410. [pmid: 12528899]
16. Chauvin TR,Griswold MD. 2004;Androgen-regulated genes in the murine epididymis.Biol Reprod 71:560–569. [pmid: 15115731]
17. Pilch B,Mann M. 2006;Large-scale and high-confidence proteomic analysis of human seminal plasma.Genome Biol 7:R40. [pmid: 16709260]
18. Toyoda Y,Chang MC. 1974;Capacitation of epididymal spermatozoa in a medium with high K/Na ratio and cyclic AMP for the fertilization of rat eggs in vitro.J Reprod Fert 36:125–134.
19. Davis BK. 1981;Timing of fertilization in mammals: sperm cholesterol/phospholipid ratio as a determinant of the capacitation interval.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78:7560–7564. [pmid: 6950397]
20. Davis BK,Byrne R,Bedigian K. 1980;Study on the mechanism of capacitation: albumin-mediated changes in plasma membrane lipids during in vitro incubation of rat sperm cells.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 77:1546–1550. [pmid: 6445558]
21. Dow MP,Bavister BD. 1989;Direct contact is required between serum albumin and hamster spermatozoa for capacitation in vitro.Gamete Res 23:171–180. [pmid: 2731902]
22. Kohane AC,Gonzalez Echeverria MF,Pineiro L,Blaquier JA. 1980;Interaction of proteins of epididymal origin with spermatozoa.Biol Reprod 23:737–742. [pmid: 7448274]
23. Rochwerger L,Cuasnicu PS. 1992;Redistribution of a rat sperm epididymal glycoprotein after in vitro and in vivo capacitation.Mol Reprod Dev 31:34–41. [pmid: 1562325]
24. Saxena DK,Toshimori K. 2004;Molecular modifications of MC31/CE9, a sperm surface molecule, during sperm capacitation and the acrosome reaction in the rat: Is MC31/CE9 required for fertilization?Biol Reprod 70:993–1000. [pmid: 14645104]
25. Fraser LR,Umar G,Sayed S. 1993;Na(+)-requiring mechanisms modulate capacitation and acrosomal exocytosis in mouse spermatozoa.J Reprod Fertil 97:539–549. [pmid: 8388959]
26. Oberlander G,Yeung CH,Cooper TG. 1996;Influence of oral administration of ornidazole on capacitation and the activity of some glycolytic enzymes of rat spermatozoa.J Reprod Ferti 106:231–239.
27. Zhu CF,Liu Q,Zhang L,Yuan HX,Zhen W,et al. 2007;Rnase9, an androgen-dependent member of the RNase a family is specifically expressed in the rat epididymis.Biol Reprod 76:63–73. [pmid: 17005942]
28. Mittal V. 2004;Improving the efficiency of RNA interference in mammals.Nat Rev Genet 5:355–365. [pmid: 15143318]
29. Shoji M,Chuma S,Yoshida K,Morita T,Nakatsuji N. 2005;RNA interference during spermatogenesis in mice.Dev Biol 282:524–534. [pmid: 15950615]
30. Kumar P,Wu H,McBride JL,Jung KE,Kim MH,et al. 2007;Transvascular delivery of small interfering RNA to the central nervous system.Nature 448:39–43. [pmid: 17572664]
31. Khvorova A,Reynolds A,Jayasena SD. 2003;Functional siRNAs and miRNAs exhibit strand bias.Cell 115:209–216. [pmid: 14567918]
32. Reynolds A,Leake D,Boese Q,Scaringe S,Marshall WS,et al. 2004;Rational siRNA design for RNA interference.Nat Biotechnol 22:326–30. [pmid: 14758366]
33. Luconi M,Barni T,Vannelli GB,Krausz C,Marra F,et al. 1998;Extracellular signal-regulated kinases modulate capacitation of human spermatozoa.Biol Reprod 58:1476–1489. [pmid: 9623609]
34. Luconi M,Krausz C,Forti G,Baldi E. 1996;Extracellular calcium negatively modulates tyrosine phosphorylation and tyrosine kinase activity during capacitation of human spermatozoa.Biol Reprod 55:207–216. [pmid: 8793077]
35. Visconti PE,Bailey JL,Moore GD,Pan D,Olds-Clarke P,et al. 1995;Capacitation of mouse spermatozoa I. Correlation between the capacitation state and protein tyrosine phosphorylation.Development 121:1129–1137. [pmid: 7743926]
36. Robert KP,Wamstad JA,Ensrud KM,Hamilton DW. 2003;Inhibition of capacitation-associated tyrosine phosphorylation signaling in rat sperm by epididymal protein Crisp-1.Biol Reprod 69:572–581. [pmid: 12700197]
37. Visconti PE,Westbrook VA,Chertihin O,Demarco I,Sleight S,et al. 2002;Novel signaling pathways involved in sperm acquisition of fertilizing capacity.J Reprod Immunol 53:133–150. [pmid: 11730911]
38. Watson PF. 1995;Recent developments and concepts in the cryopreservation of spermatozoa and the assessment of their post-thawing function.Reprod Fertil Dev 7:871–891. [pmid: 8711221]
39. Taft R,King R,Anderson S,Killian GJ. 1992;In vitro capacitation of sperm from fertile and subfertile bulls using oviductal fluid.J Anim Sci 70(Suppl):256.
40. Seli E,Gardner DK,Schoolcraft WB,Moffatt O,Sakkas D. 2004;Extent of nuclear DNA damage in ejaculated spermatozoa impacts on blastocyst development after in vitro fertilization.Fertil Steril 82:378–83. [pmid: 15302287]
41. Ajduk A,Yamauchi Y,Ward MA. 2006;Sperm chromatin remodeling after intracytoplasmic sperm injection differs from that of in vitro fertilization.Biol Reprod 75:442–451. [pmid: 16775225]
42. Royere D,Hamamah S,Nicolle JC,Lansac J. 1991;Does in vitro capacitation alter chromatin stability of ejaculated human spermatozoa? Cytochemical sutudy.Mol Reprod Dev 28:177–182. [pmid: 2007031]
43. Yanagimachi R. 1994Mammalian fertilization.Knobil E,Neill JDThe Physiology of Reproduction New York: Raven Press; :189–317.
44. Cross NL. 1998;Role of cholesterol in sperm capacitation.Bol Reprod 59:7–11.
45. Visconti PE,Ning XP,Forne MW,Alvarez JG,Stein P,et al. 1999;Cholesterol efflux-mediated signal transduction in mammalian sperm: cholesterol release signals an increase in protein tyrosine phosphorylation during mouse sperm capacitation.Dev Biol 214:429–443. [pmid: 10525345]
46. Suarez SS. 1998;The oviductal sperm reservoir in mammals: mechanisms of formation.Biol Reprod 58:1105–1107. [pmid: 9603241]
47. Hu YX,Guo JY,Shen L,Chen Y,Zhang ZC,et al. 2002;Get effective polyclonal antisera in one month.Cell Res 12:157–160. [pmid: 12118942]
48. Li P,Chan HC,He B,So SC,Chung YW,et al. 2001;An antimicrobial peptide gene found in the male reproductive system of rats.Science 291:1783–1785. [pmid: 11230693]
49. Araki Y,Suzuki K,Matusik RJ,Obinata M,Orgebin-Crist MC. 2002;Immortalized epididymal cell lines from transgenic mice overexpressing temperature-sensitive simian virus 40 large T-antigen gene.J Androl 23:854–869. [pmid: 12399533]
50. Kirby JA,Yang L,Labus JC,Lye RJ,Hsia N,et al. 2004;Characterization of epididymal epithelial cell-specific gene promoters by in vivo electroporation.Biol Reprod 71:613–619. [pmid: 15115732]
51. Gomendio M,Martin-Coello J,Crespo C,Magana C,Roldan ER. 2006;Sperm competition enhances functional capacity of mammalian spermatozoa.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:15113–15117. [pmid: 16990431]
52. Harrison RA,Ashworth PJ,Milier NG. 1996;Bicarbonate/CO2, an effector of capacitation, induces a rapid and reversible change in the lipid architecture of boar sperm plasm membrane.Mol Reprod Dev 45:378–391. [pmid: 8916050]


[Figure ID: pone-0004106-g001]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004106.g001.
Figure 1  The localization of HongrES1 protein in the rat epididymis.

(A) Rabbit polyclonal antisera were raised against HongrES1 recombinant protein (antigen) and the specificity of the antibody towards HongrES1 was verified by Western blotting. (B) Western analysis of HongrES1 protein in total tissue protein extracts from caput (Cap), corpus (Cor) and cauda (Cau) of the epididymis and testis (Te). Blot was probed with monoclonal antibody against GAPDH to assess protein loading. (C) Western analysis of HongrES1 protein in total protein extracts of sperm from caput (Cap), corpus (Cor) and cauda (Cau) regions of the epididymis. ??actin was used for loading control. (D) The change of molecular masses of HongrES1 protein in total tissue protein of cauda epididymis before (?) and after (+) deglycosylation by Peptide N-Glycosidase F (PNGase-F). (E?G) The immunohistochemical staining showed the expression pattern of HongrES1 protein in the whole epididymis (E) and the epithelial cells of the cauda epididymis (F), meanwhile, the immunoreactivity are also detected in the lumen (E and F). Preimmune serum at the same condition showed background level of immunoreactivity (G). (H) The subcellular localization of HongrES1 protein is determined by using cell-specific antibodies. The immunofluorenscence of HongrES1 (FITC-labeled, green) and ATP6E (Rhodamine labeled for clear cells, red) are shown by confocal microscopy. (I) The localization of HongrES1 protein on the spermatozoa by indirect influorescence assays. The positive HongrES1 immunoreactivity is localized the head of sperm from cauda (Cau) region, but not from caput (Cap) and corpus (Cor) regions of epididymis. (J) The HongrES1 binding pattern on the whole head of the cauda sperm. Sperm DNA was stained with propidium iodide (PI) in red color.

[Figure ID: pone-0004106-g002]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004106.g002.
Figure 2  Androgen regulation and developmental change of the HongrES1 expression.

(A) Northern blot analysis of adult rat epididymal RNAs from precastration (0 d) and bilateral castration for 1, 3, 5, and 7 days (1 d, 3 d, 5 d, and 7 d) as well as for 1, 3, 5, and 7 days after the initial injection of testosterone propionate applied to the 7 d-castrated rats (7+1 d, 7+3 d, 7+5 d, and 7+7 d). The total RNAs were pooled from four to seven animals at each time-point. (B) The relative expression levels of HongrES1 mRNA (hybridization density of HongrES1 mRNA/18S ribosomal RNA) in the rat cauda epididymis and the serum testosterone level (expressed in nanomoles per liter) during androgen manipulation (n?=?4?7). (C) Northern analysis of HongrES1 mRNA and 18S rRNA during development. The samples were collected at 15 d, 30 d, 45 d, 60 d, 90 d, 120 d, 270 d, 360 d, 450 d and 720 d respectively. RNAs were pooled from three animals per group. (D) Western blot analysis of HongrES1 and ??actin proteins during development. The samples were collected at 15 d, 30 d, 45 d, 60 d, 90 d, 120 d, 270 d, 450 d and 720 d respectively. The total proteins were pooled from three animals each group. (E) The relative amounts of HongrES1 mRNA (hybridization density of HongrES1 mRNA/18S ribosomal RNA) and protein (immunoreactivity density of HongrES1 protein/??actin protein) in the rat epididymis at different developmental stages (n?=?3).

[Figure ID: pone-0004106-g003]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004106.g003.
Figure 3  Effect of HongrES1 protein on sperm capacitation and the acrosome reaction in vitro.

(A?C) Distinct Chlortetracycline fluorescence staining patterns in uncapacitated sperm with uniform bright fluorescence over the head, F pattern (A), capacitated sperm with a dark band in the postacrosomal region, B pattern (B), and acrosome reacted sperm with dark head except for the tip, which retained some weak fluorescence, AR pattern (C). (D?F) The binding pattern of HongrES1 on the uncapacitated sperm (D), capacitated sperm (E) and acrosome-reacted sperm (F). (G?J) The effect of polyclonal antisera against HongrES1 on sperm state. The changes in the percentage of sperm motility (G), uncapacitated sperm or F pattern (H), capacitated sperm or B pattern (I), and acrosome reacted sperm or AR pattern (J). The treatments with preimmune serum (Pre), HongrES1 antibody (Anti-H), and RNase9 antibody (Anti-R9) were conducted at the time-point of dilution (0 h), and then the aliquots of spermatozoa were taken for recording of motility and CTC assay at 0 h, 1 h, 3 h, and 5 h. In each experiment, at least 300 cells was assessed in duplicate from each sample, the experiment was independently replicated four times, Value are means?SEM (n?=?4), **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, as compared with the untreated control.

[Figure ID: pone-0004106-g004]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004106.g004.
Figure 4  Knockdown of HongrES1 expression by RNAi and its effect of sperm capacitation.

(A) Northern blot and western blot analysis showed reduced expression of HongrES1 mRNA and protein in vitro 48 h after siRNAs treatment. Csi, scrambled siRNA control; Hsi1 and Hsi2, two siRNAs specifically targeting the different sites of HongrES1 sequence. 18S and GAPDH were measured as the internal control for RNA and protein loading. (B) The expression of HongrES1 was significantly suppressed by Hsi1 and Hsi2 in rat caudal tissues of epididymis on mRNA and protein levels. Data are expressed as the means?SEM (n?=?7?9), **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, as compared with the scrambled siRNA control. Csi, scrambled siRNA control; Hsi1 and Hsi2, two siRNAs specifically targeting the different sites of HongrES1 sequence. 18S and GAPDH acted as a loading control respectively. (C, D) The immunofluorescence staining of sperm from cauda epididymis treated with scrambled siRNA and two specific siRNAs (C), and corresponding binding percentages obtained by flow cytometry (D). The scale bars represent 50 ?m in panels. Pre, the negative control of preimmune serum. Csi, scrambled siRNA control; Hsi1 and Hsi2, two siRNAs specifically targeting the different sites of HongrES1 sequence. (E?H) The percentage of sperm motility (E), unpacitated sperm or F pattern (F), capacitated sperm or B pattern (G), and acrosome reacted sperm or AR pattern (H) after expression of HongrES1 was down-regulated. The spermatozoa of caudal epididymis from rats treated by siRNAs for 48 h were collected and incubated, CTC assay was conducted at 0 h, 1 h, 3 h of incubation in the capacitation medium. Data are expressed as the means?SEM (n?=?8), **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, as compared with the scrambled siRNA control. (I) The change of protein tyrosine phosphorylation on cauda sperm proteins after HongrES1 expression was inhibited. The spermatozoa of caudal epididymis from rats treated by siRNAs for 48 h were collected and incubated. The spermatozoa total proteins were collected at 0 h, 1 h and 3 h of incubation; ?-tubulin was used as loading control. Csi, scrambled siRNA control; Hsi1 and Hsi2, two siRNAs specifically targeting the different sites of HongrES1 sequence.

[Figure ID: pone-0004106-g005]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004106.g005.
Figure 5  Fertility of HongrES1 knockdown male rat.

(A) The relative expression levels of HongrES1 including mRNA and protein in caudal epididymis from all successfully mated rats after RNAi. Data are expressed as the means?SEM. (n?=?10?14), ***P<0.001, as compared with the corresponding control. Csi, scrambled siRNA control; Hsi1 and Hsi2, two siRNAs specifically targeting the different sites of HongrES1 sequence. (B) The numbers of live offspring (open cycles) and fetuses (filled triangles) from normal female rats mated with knockdown male rats. Inserts show the average of the results. Data are expressed as the means?SEM. (n?=?9?13), ***P<0.001, as compared with the corresponding control. Csi, scrambled siRNA control; Hsi1 and Hsi2, two siRNAs specifically targeting the different sites of HongrES1 sequence. (C) Dead (black arrow head) and small size (red arrow head) individual appeared in the litters after the HongrES1 expression of mated male rats was down-regulated by RNAi. (D) The abnormal embryos (black arrow head) appeared in the uterus after the HongrES1 expression of mated male rats was down-regulated by RNAi.

[Figure ID: pone-0004106-g006]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004106.g006.
Figure 6  HongrES1 knockdown enlarged the action of BSA on sperm in vitro.

(A) The change of protein tyrosine phosphorylation on siRNA-treated sperm after incubation in the presence or absence of BSA. The spermatozoa of caudal epididymis from rats treated by siRNAs for 48 h were collected and incubated. The spermatozoa total proteins were collected at 0 h, 1 h and 3 h of incubation; ?-tubulin was used as loading control. Csi, scrambled siRNA control; Hsi2, the siRNA specifically targeting the site of HongrES1 sequence. (B) Flow cytometric dot-plots of merocyanine and Yo-Pro-1 stained sperm population. The spermatozoa of caudal epididymis from rats treated by siRNAs for 48 h were collected and incubated. The spermatozoa were stained and subjected to flow cytometry as described in Material and Methods. D, dead cells (stained with Yo-Pro-1); L, live cells showing merocyanine staining. Csi, scrambled siRNA control; Hsi1 and Hsi2, two siRNAs specifically targeting the different sites of HongrES1 sequence.

[TableWrap ID: pone-0004106-t001] doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004106.t001.
Table 1  The frequency of abnormal fertility after HongrES1 knockdown by RNAi in vivo.
Frequency of dead offspring Frequency of small size offspring Frequency of abnormal embryos
Csi 0/11 0/11 0/12
Hsi1 5/13 (1?2) 1/13 (1) 4/11 (1?2)
Hsi2 3/12 (1?3) 1/12 (1) 3/12 (1?4)

nt101Denominator: the total number of female rats producing offspring or fetuses, numerator: the number of female rats producing abnormal offspring or fetuses, parentheses: the number of abnormal offspring or fetuses in each litter or each uterus corresponding to numerator.

Article Categories:
  • Research Article
Article Categories:
  • Biochemistry
  • Immunology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Biochemistry/Cell Signaling and Trafficking Structures
  • Biochemistry/Chemical Biology of the Cell
  • Biochemistry/Protein Chemistry
  • Biochemistry/Transcription and Translation
  • Molecular Biology/DNA Methylation
  • Urology/Infertility
  • Urology/Testicular Cancer

Previous Document:  Validating discovered Cis-acting regulatory genetic variants: application of an allele specific expr...
Next Document:  Calnexin is not essential for mammalian rod opsin biogenesis.