Document Detail

The epidemiology of traumatic cervical spine fractures: a prospective population study from Norway.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23259662     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
AIM: The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of traumatic cervical spine fractures (CS-fx) in a general population.
BACKGROUND: The incidence of CS-fx in the general population is largely unknown.
METHODS: All CS-fx (C0/C1 to C7/Th1) patients diagnosed with cervical-CT in Southeast Norway (2.7 million inhabitants) during the time period from April 27, 2010-April 26, 2011 were prospectively registered in this observational cohort study.
RESULTS: Over a one-year period, 319 patients with CS-fx at one or more levels were registered, constituting an estimated incidence of 11.8/100,000/year. The median age of the patients was 56 years (range 4-101 years), and 68% were males. The relative incidence of CS-fx increased significantly with age. The trauma mechanisms were falls in 60%, motorized vehicle accidents in 21%, bicycling in 8%, diving in 4% and others in 7% of patients. Neurological status was normal in 79%, 5% had a radiculopathy, 8% had an incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI), 2% had a complete SCI, and neurological function could not be determined in 6%. The mortality rates after 1 and 3 months were 7 and 9%, respectively. Among 319 patients, 26.6% were treated with open surgery, 68.7% were treated with external immobilization with a stiff collar and 4.7% were considered stable and not in need of any specific treatment. The estimated incidence of surgically treated CS-fx in our population was 3.1/100,000/year.
CONCLUSIONS: This study estimates the incidence of traumatic CS-fx in a general Norwegian population to be 11.8/100,000/year. A male predominance was observed and the incidence increased with increasing age. Falls were the most common trauma mechanism, and SCI was observed in 10%. The 1- and 3-month mortality rates were 7 and 9%, respectively. The incidence of open surgery for the fixation of CS-fx in this population was 3.1/100,000/year.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: This is a prospective observational cohort study and level II-2 according to US Preventive Services Task Force.
Authors:
Hege Linnerud Fredø; Syed Ali Mujtaba Rizvi; Bjarne Lied; Pål Rønning; Eirik Helseth
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2012-12-21
Journal Detail:
Title:  Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine     Volume:  20     ISSN:  1757-7241     ISO Abbreviation:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med     Publication Date:  2012  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-01-17     Completed Date:  2013-06-20     Revised Date:  2013-07-11    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101477511     Medline TA:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  85     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital-Ullevål, Oslo, Norway. UXEGFR@ous-hf.no
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Accidental Falls / statistics & numerical data
Accidents, Traffic / statistics & numerical data
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bicycling / injuries
Cervical Vertebrae / injuries*
Child
Child, Preschool
Comorbidity
Female
Humans
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Norway / epidemiology
Prospective Studies
Spinal Fractures / epidemiology*
Spondylitis, Ankylosing / epidemiology
Young Adult
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med
ISSN: 1757-7241
Publisher: BioMed Central
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright ©2012 Fredø et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
open-access:
Received Day: 20 Month: 8 Year: 2012
Accepted Day: 16 Month: 12 Year: 2012
collection publication date: Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 21 Month: 12 Year: 2012
Volume: 20First Page: 85 Last Page: 85
PubMed Id: 23259662
ID: 3546896
Publisher Id: 1757-7241-20-85
DOI: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-85

The epidemiology of traumatic cervical spine fractures: a prospective population study from Norway
Hege Linnerud Fredø1 Email: UXEGFR@ous-hf.no
Syed Ali Mujtaba Rizvi2 Email: alirizvi@live.no
Bjarne Lied1 Email: UXLIBB@ous-hf.no
Pål Rønning3 Email: PAROEN@ous-hf.no
Eirik Helseth12 Email: EHELSETH@ous-hf.no
1Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital–Ullevål, Oslo, N-0407, Norway
2Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
3Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital–Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway

Background

The incidence of traumatic cervical spine fractures (CS-fx) in the general population is largely unknown. Several reports describe the incidence of CS-fx in different subpopulations, such as trauma center patients, specific age groups, head injury patients, military populations and osteoporotic patients [1-15]. Our literature search identified only one article describing the incidence of spine fractures in a general population. In 1996, Hu et al. reported the incidence of spine fractures, all sites, to be 64/100,000 [16]. However, subgrouping into cervical, thoracic or lumbar fractures was performed for only 45% of the patients. The assumed incidence of CS-fx can be estimated to be 12/100,000 based on this study, which was performed on a population in Canada.

CS-fx are more common in males than females [1,4-6,10,11,13,17-21]. With respect to age, the highest incidence rate is reported to be among patients aged 15–45 years, with a second peak in those aged 65 – 80 years [1,4-6,17,21-24]. Most articles report motor vehicle collisions to be the most frequent trauma mechanism leading to cervical spine injury, [1,2,13,14,19,21] while a minority report falls as the most frequent [10,22,23]. The incidence of cervical spine injury in the setting of head injury has been reported to range between 1.8-9% [4,7-9,14,15,18,25]. Conversely, the incidence of moderate to severe head injury in patients with cervical spine injury is reported to be between 18 – 40% [1,7-9,22,23,26]. Spinal cord injury (SCI) is reported to occur in 12 – 50% of patients with CS-fx [4,9,11,14,16,17,21-23]. The relationships described between CS-fx and gender, age, trauma mechanism, head injury and SCI are based on studies of subpopulations of trauma patients and not on trauma cases from a general population. Thus, these “well-accepted” relationships may not be true for cervical spine injuries in a general population.

The main aim of this study was to determine the incidence of CS-fx in a general population. We also sought to investigate possible risk factors for CS-fx, such as gender, age and trauma mechanism. In addition, the frequencies of neurological deficit and open surgical fixation in these patients were studied.


Methods

Oslo University Hospital-Ullevål (OUS-U) is a level 1 trauma center situated in Oslo. It is the only neurosurgical trauma center for the Southeast part of Norway (120,000 km2), which has 2.70 million inhabitants. The age distribution in this population is as follows: 541,077 aged 0 – 15 years, 524,546 aged 16 – 30 years, 578,001 aged 31 – 45 years, 520,114 aged 46 – 60 years, 358,150 aged 61 – 75 years, 162,750 aged 76 – 90 years and 15,353 aged >90 years. OUS-U performs >95% of the trauma-related neurosurgical procedures in this population, including all surgeries for cervical spine injury. There are 20 hospitals within our region with general and/or orthopedic surgeons and radiological services that refer patients with head and cervical spine injuries to us. The patients are either admitted to OUS-U for treatment or non-surgical treatment is carried out locally after consultation with the Department of Neurosurgery at OUS-U.

To determine the incidence of CS-fx in this prospective observational cohort study, we prospectively registered all CS-fx patients (C0/C1 to C7/Th1) diagnosed with cervical-CT (frequently supplemented with cervical MRI) in Southeast Norway from April 27, 2010-April 26, 2011.

The following data were recorded: sex, age, anatomical level of injury, number of cervical levels injured, trauma mechanism according to ICD-10, [27] fall injuries subclassified according to the Canadian C-spine rule [12] based on the mechanism of injury (falls from ≥1 meter or ≥5 stairs) (yes/no), Head Injury Severity Score (HISS), [28] ankylosing spondylitis (yes/no), concomitant thoracolumbar fracture (only patients admitted to OUS-U) (yes/no), neurological deficit at the time of diagnosis (normal, radiculopathy, incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI), complete SCI or unknown (due to severe head injury or extensive multitrauma)), primary treatment (none, external immobilization with stiff collar, open surgical fixation) and mortality 1 and 3 months after the diagnosis. Vital status (dead or alive) and time of death were determined based on the Norwegian Population Registry (Folkeregisteret) data for August 1. 2011. The two major groups of fractures were further classified, odontoid fractures according to Anderson and D’Alonzo [29] and subaxial fractures according to the Subaxial Injury Classification system (SLIC) [30].

The SLIC system is based on literature review and expert opinions, designed to describe and classify cervical spine injury. It takes into account 3 major aspects of injury; the morphology, the disco-ligamentous complex and the neurological status. In each category, points are awarded for abnormalities, more points indicate a more severe injury, and the total score leads to a recommendation for surgical or non-surgical treatment.

We registered all patients diagnosed in our health region, including patients who were just visiting on vacation or work immigrants without a Norwegian social security number. The number of patients without a Norwegian social security number was 17 (5.3%): 11 were working in Norway, three were on vacation and three could not be located.


Results

In our defined population of 2.7 million people (Southeast Norway), we prospectively registered 319 patients with one or more CS-fx during the year of registration. This registration yielded an incidence of CS-fx of 11.8/100,000.

The median age of the patients was 56 years (range 4–101 years), and 217/319 (68%) were males (Table 1). The mean age of males was significant lower than for females (p = 0.01). The relative incidence of CS-fx increased significantly with age (Table 2 and Figure 1).

The trauma mechanisms were falls in 60%, motorized vehicle accidents in 21%, bicycling in 8%, diving in 4% and others in 7% (Table 3). Fall-related injuries were subclassified according to the Canadian C-spine rule, which identified falls from ≥1 meter or ≥5 stairs to be responsible for the injuries among 82 patients (43%). Patients with fall-related injuries tended to be older, while patients injured in motorized vehicle-, bicycle- or diving accidents tended to be younger (Tables 3 and 4).

Among 319 patients, a total of 420 injured levels were identified; 81 patients (26%) had fractures at more than one cervical level (Table 1). There were 147 high CS-fx (C0-C2) and 273 subaxial (C3-C7) fractures. The levels affected most frequently were C2 and C5-7. A combined high- and subaxial fracture was observed in 17 patients. The median age for patients with C0-C2 fractures was 66 years (range 16–101), and 58% were males. The median age of patients with subaxial fracture was 49 (range 4–94), and 74% were males.

Ultimately, 228 of the 319 patients included in this study were admitted to OUS-U. In this subgroup, 50 (22%) patients had a concomitant fracture in the thoracolumbar spine.

SCI was present in 33 patients (10%) (Table 1). Neurological disability was significantly more frequent in subaxial fractures than in C0-C2 fractures (Table 5). SCI tended to be more frequent in younger patients (Table 6).

Treatment

Ultimately, 85 (26.6%) of the patients were treated with open surgery, while 219 (68.7%) were treated with external immobilization with a stiff collar, and 15 (4.7%) were considered stable and not in need of any specific treatment. These results yield an estimated incidence for surgically treated CS-fx in our population of 3.1/100,000/year. The data showed that 17/133 (12.8%) patients with C0 – C2 fractures and 68/203 (33.5%) with subaxial fractures underwent surgery.

A total of 61 odontoid fractures were identified. According to the Anderson and D’Alonzo classification [29] there were 35 type 2 and 26 type 3 fractures. Eleven of the odontoid fractures (18%) were treated with open surgery; of these, 7 patients had type 2 fractures and 4 patients had type 3 fractures.

All 203 patients with subaxial injuries were classified according to SLIC [30]. Open surgical fixation was performed in 68/203 (33.5%) patients. Of 68 patients with SLIC scores ≥5, 55 (81%) were treated with open surgery and 13 (19%) with external immobilization. Of 27 patients with SLIC scores = 4, 8 were treated with open surgery and 19 were treated with a stiff collar. Of 108 patients with SLIC scores <4, 5 were treated with open surgery, 94 were treated with stiff collars, and nine patients received no treatment.

Mortality

The 1- and 3-month mortality rates in this series were 7 and 9%, respectively. For surgically treated patients, the 1- and 3-month mortality rates were 2% and 3%, respectively. The 3-month mortality was 15% for patients with C0-C2 fractures and 6% for patients with subaxial and combined axial and subaxial fractures.


Discussion

This prospective study estimates the incidence of traumatic CS-fx in a general Norwegian population to be 11.8/100,000/year. The incidence of open surgery for the fixation of CS-fx in this population is 3.1/100,000/year. Thus, 27% of the CS-fx were treated by open surgery.

We identified only one previous publication from which we could estimate the incidence of traumatic CS-fx in a general population. This Canadian study from 1996 reported the incidence of spine fractures at all sites to be 64/100,000/year [16]. Subgrouping into cervical, thoracic or lumbar fractures was performed for only 45% of the patients that were admitted to hospitals. In these patients, the site involved was cervical in 19% of patients, thoracic in 30% of patients, lumbosacral in 43% of patients, and unspecified in 8% of patients. If we assume fractures at all levels were admitted to the same extent, this would give an incidence of CS-fx in this population of 12/100,000/year. This incidence number is almost identical to what we find in our population.

Other authors report higher incidence numbers, but these populations are subgroups, similar to the large military population described by Schoenfeld, who found the incidence of traumatic CS-fx to be 29/100,000/year [17].

We observed a male predominance among our patient population. This is in accordance with previous reports [1,4-6,10,11,13,17-21]. The age distribution in our series reveals the highest frequency of cervical spine fracture among those aged 46–90 years. When adjusted for the age distribution in the Norwegian population, we found a steadily increasing incidence with rising age. This is in contrast to former reports, which found the third decade of life or age between 15–45 years to be more strongly associated with an increased risk of cervical spine injury [1,4,5,17,21,22,24]. Some authors also reported a second “peak” at age 65–80, [6,23,24] which is more in accordance with our results. We found a low incidence of cervical spine fractures in children, as reported by others [2,3,6,15,23].

Fall-related injuries were observed in more than half of our patients. Most other authors have found motor vehicle collisions to be the most frequent trauma mechanism leading to cervical spine injury, with falls the second most frequent [1,2,13,14,19,21]. A minority of authors report the same findings that we do regarding trauma mechanism [10,22,23]. Minimally dangerous situations (falls from <1 meter or <5 stairs) accounted for 57% of the falls in our material. It is probable that these injuries are frequently not included in subgroups of trauma center populations. These patients are often referred from general practitioners or emergency primary care because of sustained neck pain after a minor trauma. Some recent reports indicate a trend during recent decades of an increasing median age of spine trauma patients and a shift towards falls as the most frequent mechanism of injury [19,20]. Our results are in line with this trend.

The incidence of cervical spine injury in patients with moderate and severe head injury has been reported to range between 1.8% and 9% [4,7-9,14,15,18,25,31]. Some authors, though not all, report that patients in a trauma population with clinically significant head injuries are at greater risk of cervical spine injury than those without head trauma and that patients with a severe head injury (GCS ≤8) are at even greater risk. Conversely, the incidence of moderate to severe head injury in patients with cervical spine injury is reported to be 18 – 40% [1,7-9,22,23,26]. In our series, 11% of the patients had a concomitant moderate or severe head injury. The lower rate of moderate and severe head injuries observed in our material is most likely because we have studied a general population and not a selected subpopulation. In contrast to many reports from selected trauma populations, we also include the low-energy trauma that often leads to cervical spine fracture in the elderly. However, the rates of minimal and mild head injury in our patients were as high as 78%, so there is no doubt that head and neck injuries are closely associated.

In our patients with cervical fractures, neurological status was normal in 79%, 5% had a radiculopathy, 8% had incomplete SCI, 2% had complete SCI and neurological function could not be determined by chart review in 6%. Neurological disability was significantly more frequent in subaxial fractures than in C0-C2 fractures. The incidence of cervical SCI in the setting of a cervical spine fracture is reported to be 12-50% [4,9,11,14,16,17,21-23]. Only 10% of the patients in our study population had SCI. Again, the lower rate of SCI in our report compared to other series is likely due to our study of the general population rather than a subpopulation. The incidence of cervical SCI in the setting of a CS-fx is 1.2/100,000/year.

In a population study from Western Norway, the incidence of acute traumatic SCI during the time period from 1997–2001 was estimated to be 1.4/100,000 [32]. This study also included SCI without concurrent CS-fx.

The 1- and 3-month mortality rates in this series were 7 and 9%, respectively. For surgically treated patients, the 1- and 3-month mortality rates were 2% and 3%, respectively.

We have not found comparable mortality data on patients with CS-fx from a general population, but according to the mortality rates reported in different subgroups, the mortality in our population seems to be in the lower range [1,4,22,33-35].

Among all 319 patients, 27% were treated with open surgery, 68% were treated with external immobilization with a stiff collar and 5% were considered stable and not in need of any specific treatment. This distribution yields an estimated incidence of surgically treated CS-fx in our population of 3.1/100,000/year.

Of the odontoid fractures, 18% were treated with open surgery, seven were type 2 fractures and four were type 3 fractures. There is still insufficient evidence to establish a standard or guideline for odontoid fracture management, and there are various reported approaches for treatment [36-38].

Open surgical fixation was conducted in 33.5% of the patients with subaxial fractures. Among patients with SLIC scores ≥5, 81% were treated with open surgery and 19% with external immobilization. These are cases in which the SLIC recommended open surgical treatment. Among the population studied here, 37% of the patients with SLIC scores = 4 underwent open surgery, and 63% received a stiff collar. In this group, SLIC found the treatment options to be equivocal. The records showed that 5% of the patients with SLIC scores <4 were treated with open surgery, 87% were treated with stiff collars, and 8% received no treatment. The SLIC recommendation for these patients is non-surgical treatment. In this investigation, 9% of our patients with subaxial CS-fx were not treated with the modality recommended based on the SLIC score. However, concomitant and comorbidity factors are to be taken into consideration when selecting treatment, and these factors are not accounted for in the treatment algorithms used here. We therefore find our compliance with the SLIC recommendations to be acceptable.

Limitations

The incidence of CS-fx found in our study is most likely an underestimate because we believe that some fractures are considered stable at their local orthopedic departments, and they are treated with external immobilization without our knowledge. We know this for certain because some of these patients are later referred to us when the non-surgical treatment has failed. Data from The Norwegian Patient Registry also support the assumption that the present data are an underestimate (HL Fredø et al., unpublished results). Some fractures causing immediate death at the scene of the accident are also missed when using this approach. Reports suggest that 21-24% of victims dying immediately or soon after a traffic accident have a serious injury to the cervical spine [39,40].

Strengths

Our data were registered prospectively in a defined general population, and the study is contemporary. All charts and radiological examinations were reviewed.


Conclusions

This prospective study estimates the incidence of traumatic CS-fx in a general Norwegian population to be 11.8/100,000/year. A male predominance was observed, and the incidence increased with advancing age. Falls were the most common trauma mechanism, and SCI was observed in 10% of those included. The 1- and 3-month mortality rates were 7% and 9%, respectively. The incidence of open surgical fixation of CS-fx in this population is 3.1/100,000/year.


Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this paper.


Authors’ contribution

Study design: HLF and EH. Collection of data: HLF and SAMR. Data analysis and statistics: HLF, SAMR, BL, PR and EH. Interpretation of data: HLF, SAMR, BL, PR and EH. Writing of manuscript: HLF, PR and EH. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


References
Clayton JL,Harris MB,Weintraub SL,Marr AB,Timmer J,Stuke LE,et al. Risk factors for cervical spine injuryInjuryYear: 20124343143510.1016/j.injury.2011.06.02221726860
Brown RL,Brunn MA,Garcia VF,Cervical spine injuries in children: a review of 103 patients treated consecutively at a level 1 pediatric trauma centerJ Pediatr SurgYear: 2001361107111410.1053/jpsu.2001.2566511479837
Cirak B,Ziegfeld S,Knight VM,Chang D,Avellino AM,Paidas CN,Spinal injuries in childrenJ Pediatr SurgYear: 20043960761210.1016/j.jpedsurg.2003.12.01115065038
Hills MW,Deane SA,Head injury and facial injury: is there an increased risk of cervical spine injury?J TraumaYear: 19933454955310.1097/00005373-199304000-000118487340
Hoffman JR,Schriger DL,Mower W,Luo JS,Zucker M,Low-risk criteria for cervical-spine radiography in blunt trauma: a prospective studyAnn Emerg MedYear: 1992211454146010.1016/S0196-0644(05)80059-91443841
Lowery DW,Wald MM,Browne BJ,Tigges S,Hoffman JR,Mower WR,Epidemiology of cervical spine injury victimsAnn Emerg MedYear: 200138121610.1067/mem.2001.11614911423805
Michael DB,Guyot DR,Darmody WR,Coincidence of head and cervical spine injuryJ NeurotraumaYear: 1989617718910.1089/neu.1989.6.1772810382
Mulligan RP,Friedman JA,Mahabir RC,A nationwide review of the associations among cervical spine injuries, head injuries, and facial fracturesJ TraumaYear: 20106858759210.1097/TA.0b013e3181b16bc519996802
O’Malley KF,Ross SE,The incidence of injury to the cervical spine in patients with craniocerebral injuryJ TraumaYear: 1988281476147810.1097/00005373-198810000-000133172308
Roberge RJ,Wears RC,Kelly M,Evans TC,Kenny MA,Daffner RD,et al. Selective application of cervical spine radiography in alert victims of blunt trauma: a prospective studyJ TraumaYear: 19882878478810.1097/00005373-198806000-000103385821
Sanchez B,Waxman K,Jones T,Conner S,Chung R,Becerra S,Cervical spine clearance in blunt trauma: evaluation of a computed tomography-based protocolJ TraumaYear: 20055917918310.1097/01.TA.0000171449.94650.8116096560
Stiell IG,Wells GA,Vandemheen KL,Clement CM,Lesiuk H,De Maio VJ,et al. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patientsJAMAYear: 20012861841184810.1001/jama.286.15.184111597285
Thompson WL,Stiell IG,Clement CM,Brison RJ,Association of injury mechanism with the risk of cervical spine fracturesCJEMYear: 200911142219166635
Williams J,Jehle D,Cottington E,Shufflebarger C,Head, facial, and clavicular trauma as a predictor of cervical-spine injuryAnn Emerg MedYear: 19922171972210.1016/S0196-0644(05)82786-61590614
Yanar H,Demetriades D,Hadjizacharia P,Nomoto S,Salim A,Inaba K,et al. Pedestrians injured by automobiles: risk factors for cervical spine injuriesJ Am Coll SurgYear: 200720579479910.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.28018035263
Hu R,Mustard CA,Burns C,Epidemiology of incident spinal fracture in a complete populationSpine (Phila Pa 1976)Year: 19962149249910.1097/00007632-199602150-000168658254
Schoenfeld AJ,Sielski B,Rivera KP,Bader JO,Harris MB,Epidemiology of cervical spine fractures in the US militarySpine J 24-4-2012. Ref Type: Electronic Citation.
Holly LT,Kelly DF,Counelis GJ,Blinman T,McArthur DL,Cryer HG,Cervical spine trauma associated with moderate and severe head injury: incidence, risk factors, and injury characteristicsJ NeurosurgYear: 20029628529111990836
Jackson AB,Dijkers M,Devivo MJ,Poczatek RB,A demographic profile of new traumatic spinal cord injuries: change and stability over 30 yearsArch Phys Med RehabilYear: 2004851740174810.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.03515520968
Kattail D,Furlan JC,Fehlings MG,Epidemiology and clinical outcomes of acute spine trauma and spinal cord injury: experience from a specialized spine trauma center in Canada in comparison with a large national registryJ TraumaYear: 20096793694310.1097/TA.0b013e3181a8b43119901651
McCabe JB,Angelos MG,Injury to the head and face in patients with cervical spine injuryAm J Emerg MedYear: 1984233333510.1016/0735-6757(84)90130-X6518036
Bohlman HH,Acute fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. An analysis of three hundred hospitalized patients and review of the literatureJ Bone Joint Surg AmYear: 19796111191142511875
Leucht P,Fischer K,Muhr G,Mueller EJ,Epidemiology of traumatic spine fracturesInjuryYear: 20094016617210.1016/j.injury.2008.06.04019233356
Ryan MD,Henderson JJ,The epidemiology of fractures and fracture-dislocations of the cervical spineInjuryYear: 199223384010.1016/0020-1383(92)90123-A1541497
Soicher E,Demetriades D,Cervical spine injuries in patients with head injuriesBr J SurgYear: 1991781013101410.1002/bjs.18007808371913094
Steudel WI,Rosenthal D,Lorenz R,Merdes W,Prognosis and treatment of cervical spine injuries with associated head traumaActa Neurochir SupplYear: 1988438590
ICD-10International statistical classification of diseases and related health problemsYear: 2009Geneva: World Health Organization
Stein SC,Spettell C,The Head Injury Severity Scale (HISS): a practical classification of closed-head injuryBrain InjYear: 1995943744410.3109/026990595090082037550215
Anderson LD,D’Alonzo RT,Fractures of the odontoid process of the axisJ Bone Joint Surg AmYear: 197456166316744434035
Vaccaro AR,Hulbert RJ,Patel AA,Fisher C,Dvorak M,Lehman RA Jr,et al. The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: a novel approach to recognize the importance of morphology, neurology, and integrity of the disco-ligamentous complexSpineYear: 2007322365237410.1097/BRS.0b013e3181557b9217906580
Bayless P,Ray VG,Incidence of cervical spine injuries in association with blunt head traumaAm J Emerg MedYear: 1989713914210.1016/0735-6757(89)90125-32920074
Hagen EM,Eide GE,Rekand T,Gilhus NE,Gronning M,A 50-year follow-up of the incidence of traumatic spinal cord injuries in Western NorwaySpinal CordYear: 20104831331810.1038/sc.2009.13319823192
Harris MB,Reichmann WM,Bono CM,Bouchard K,Corbett KL,Warholic N,et al. Mortality in elderly patients after cervical spine fracturesJ Bone Joint Surg AmYear: 20109256757410.2106/JBJS.I.0000320194314
ter Gunne AF P,Aquarius AE,Roukema JA,Risk factors predicting mortality after blunt traumatic cervical fractureInjuryYear: 2008391437144110.1016/j.injury.2008.03.00818589421
Sokolowski MJ,Jackson AP,Haak MH,Meyer PR Jr,Szewczyk SM,Acute outcomes of cervical spine injuries in the elderly: atlantaxial vs subaxial injuriesJ Spinal Cord MedYear: 20073023824217684889
Julien TD,Frankel B,Traynelis VC,Ryken TC,Evidence-based analysis of odontoid fracture managementNeurosurg Focus86e1 24-4-2012. Ref Type: Electronic Citation. 16859271
Harrop JS,Hart R,Anderson PA,Optimal treatment for odontoid fractures in the elderlySpineYear: 201035S219S22710.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f3271620881465
Rizvi SA,Fredo HL,Lied B,Nakstad PH,Ronning P,Helseth E,Surgical management of acute odontoid fractures: Surgery-related complications and long-term outcomes in a consecutive series of 97 patientsJ Trauma Acute Care SurgYear: 20127268269010.1097/TA.0b013e318236b67522491553
Alker GJ,Oh YS,Leslie EV,Lehotay J,Panaro VA,Eschner EG,Postmortem radiology of head neck injuries in fatal traffic accidentsRadiologyYear: 19751146116171118566
Bucholz RW,Burkhead WZ,Graham W,Petty C,Occult cervical spine injuries in fatal traffic accidentsJ TraumaYear: 19791976877110.1097/00005373-197910000-00009490692

Figures

[Figure ID: F1]
Figure 1 

Age-stratified incidence of CS-fx.



Tables
[TableWrap ID: T1] Table 1 

Patient characteristics


    N (%)
All
 
319 (100)
Sex
Female
102 (32.0)
Male
217 (68.0)
Age group
0-15
7 (2.2)
16-30
49 (15.4)
31-45
56 (17.6)
46-60
65 (20.4)
61-75
64 (20.1)
76-90
65 (20.4)
91-105
13 (4.1)
Ankylosing spondylitis
Yes
15 (4.7)
Number of levels injured
1
237 (74.3)
2
68 (21.3)
3
10 (3.1)
4
3 (0.9)
5
1 (0.3)
C0–C7 fx
Total
420 (100)
C0–C2 fx
C0
22 (5.2)
C1
27 (6.4)
C2 + C2/3
98 (23.3)
C3–C7 fx
C3 + C3/4
25 (6.0)
C4 + C4/5
39 (9.3)
C5 + C5/6
61 (14.5)
C6 + C6/7
89 (21.2)
C7 + C7/Th1
59 (14.0)
Neurological status at the time of diagnosis
Normal
252 (79.0)
Root injury
15 (4.7)
Incomplete SCI
27 (8.5)
Complete SCI
6 (1.9)
Unknown
19 (6.0)
HISS
No head injury
34 (10.7)
 
Minimal
181 (56.7)
 
Mild
69 (21.6)
 
Moderate
13 (4.1)
  Severe 22 (6.9)

[TableWrap ID: T2] Table 2 

Age-stratified incidence rate of CS-fx in the Southeastern part of Norway with 2.70 million inhabitants


Age group Cs-fx (N) Population Incidence 95% CI
0–15 years
7
541,077
1.9
0.52–26.66
16–30 years
49
525,546
9.3
6.89–123.35
31–45 years
56
578,001
9.7
7.31–125.85
46–60 years
65
520,114
12.5
9.64–159.34
61–75 years
64
358,150
17.9
13.76–228.19
76–90 years
65
162,750
39.9
30.79–509.22
91–105 years 13 15,353 84.7 45.05–1,448.77

[TableWrap ID: T3] Table 3 

Mechanism of trauma


ICD-10 N (%) Mean age (range) Males N (%)
Falls
190 (59.6)
65 (12–101)
124 (65)
W0n7p, W0n0r, W0n9r, W0n5r, W0n2r, W0n9a, W0n9b, W0n6r, W0n2h
Motorized vehicles
67 (21.0)
41 (5–88)
44 (66)
V2n1r, V4n1r, V6n2r, V2n7p, V2n2r, V5n2k
Bicycle
25 (7.8)
48 (22–73)
17 (68)
V1n2p, V1n1r
Pedestrian
4 (1.3)
45 (37–90)
3 (75)
V0n1r, V888r
Diving
13 (4.1)
33 (14–55)
13 (100)
W0n8r
Other
20 (6.3)
41 (4–94)
16 (80)
X59xy, X8n9r, W7n0r, W2s9b, W2s1r, W2s0r, W2s8p, W237p, X6n0y, X8n0r, W2s7p, W2s1p, W23xy, W231r
  319 (100%) 55 (4 – 101) 217 (68)

[TableWrap ID: T4] Table 4 

Mechanism of trauma versus age groups


 
ICD-10 group
Total
  Falls Motorized vehicles Bicycle Pedestrian Diving Other
AgeGroups
0-15 years
3
1
0
0
1
2
7
 
16-30 years
16
21
3
0
4
5
49
 
31-45 years
19
15
9
2
6
5
56
 
46-60 years
40
9
9
1
2
4
65
 
61-75 years
48
10
4
0
0
2
64
 
76-90 years
52
11
0
1
0
1
65
 
91-105 years
12
0
0
0
0
1
13
Total 190 67 25 4 13 20 319

[TableWrap ID: T5] Table 5 

Neurological status at time of diagnosis for patients with C0–C2 and subaxial fractures (fxs)


Neurological Status C0–C2 fx (N = 133) N (%) Subaxial fx (N = 203) N (%) Fisher’s exact test
Normal
117 (88)
152 (75)
p < 00.1
Root
0 (0)
15 (7)
Incomplete SCI
5 (4)
22 (11)
Complete SCI
0 (0)
6 (3)
Unknown 11 (8) 8 (4)  

17 of the 319 patients included in this study had both C0-C2 and Subaxial Fractures (fxs). Thus, the sum of C0-C2 and Subaxial fxs in this table adds up to 336. Regarding the 17 patients with combined fxs, the charts/MRI scans were used to determine wheter the neurological deficit(s) were associated with the axial or subaxial components of the injury.


[TableWrap ID: T6] Table 6 

Neurological status versus age groups


 
Neurological status
Total
  Normal Root Incomplete SCI Complete SCI Unknown
Age Groups
0-15 years
6
0
0
0
1
7
 
16-30 years
39
3
1
2
4
49
 
31-45 years
41
5
5
3
2
56
 
46-60 years
51
5
4
0
5
65
 
61-75 years
47
2
10
1
4
64
 
76-90 years
57
0
5
0
3
65
 
91-105 years
11
0
2
0
0
13
Total 252 15 27 6 19 319


Article Categories:
  • Original Research

Keywords: Cervical vertebrae, Spinal fractures, Trauma, Incidence, Epidemiology.

Previous Document:  Contactless Surface Conductivity Mapping of Graphene Oxide Thin Films Deposited on Glass with Scanni...
Next Document:  From LCAs to Simplified Models: A Generic Methodology Applied to Wind Power Electricity.